Advertisement

Partial-Response and Decision-Feedback Equalization

  • Jan W. M. Bergmans
Chapter

Abstract

The perpetual push for higher bit rates and higher storage densities spurs a steady increment of the amplitude distortion of many types of transmission and storage channels. The linear equalizer (LE), discussed in Chapter 5, is ill-matched to this trend because its noise enhancement will increase and eventually become untolerable. In the present chapter we discuss two receiver types that run much less rapidly out of steam. These are the partial-response equalizer (PRE) and the decision-feedback equalizer (DFE). Both are rooted in old telegraph tricks and just as the LE they take instantaneous decisions with respect to the incoming data The DFE is more powerful than the PRE and is, in fact, the optimum receiver with no detection delay. Performance improvements beyond the DFE rest in the capability to defer decisions for some time. This capability is a distinguishing feature of the Viterbi detector, discussed in Chapter 7.

Keywords

Impulse Response Minimum Phase Linear Equalizer Transmit Filter Symbol Interval 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M.E. Austin, Sc.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachussets, May 1967.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J.R. Barry, E.A. Lee and D.G. Messerschmitt, `Capacity Penalty due to Ideal Zero-Forcing Decision-Feedback Equalization’, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 1062–1071, July 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    P.S. Bednarz, N.P. Sands, C.S. Modlin, S.C. Lin, I. Lee, and J.M. Cioffi, `Performance Evaluation of an Adaptive RAM-DFE Read Channel’, IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. MAG-31, No. 2, pp. 1121–1127, March 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    R.T. Behrens and A.J. Armstrong, `An Advanced Read/Write Channel for Magnetic Disk Storage’, Proc. 20 Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Oct. 26–28, 1992, pp. 956–960.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    C.A. Belfiore and J.H. Park, Jr., `Decision Feedback Equalization’, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 67, No. 8, pp. 1143–1156, Aug. 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    W.R. Bennett and J.R. Davey, Data Transmission. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J.W.M. Bergmans, `A Bit-By-Bit Detector for Partial-Response Reception on Digital Magnetic Recording Channels’, Proc. GLOBECOM’94, pp. 1148–1151, San Fransisco, California, Nov. 27 - Dec. 2, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J.W.M. Bergmans, `Decision Feedback Equalization for Run-Length-Limited Modulation Codes with d = 1’, IEEE Trans. Magn., 1996.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    J.M. Cioffi, G.P. Dudevoir, M.V. Eyuboglu, and G.D. Forney, Jr., `MMSE Decision-Feedback Equalizers and Coding–Part II: Coding Results’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 43, No. 10, pp. 2595–2604, Oct. 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A.A. Clokey, `Automatic Printing Equipment for Long Loaded Submarine Telephone Cables’, Bell Syst. Tech. J., Vol. 6, pp. 402–424, July 1927.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    J.L. Doob, Stochastic Processes. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1967.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Duel-Hallen, `Equalizers for Multiple Input/Multiple Output Channels and PAM Systems with Cyclostationary Input Sequences’, IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. SAC-10, No. 3, pp. 630–639, Apr. 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    D.L. Duttweiler, J.E. Mazo, and D.G. Messerschmitt, `An Upper Bound on the Error Probability in Decision-Feedback Equalization’, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. IT-220, pp. 490–497, July 1974.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    M.J. Ferguson, `Optimal Reception for Binary Partial Response Channels’, Bell Syst. Tech. J., Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 493–505, Feb. 1972.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. Fischer, Using Flexible Precoding for Channels with Spectral Nulls’, Electron. Lett., Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 356–358, March 2, 1995.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    K.D. Fisher, J.M. Cioffi, W.L. Abbott, P.S. Bednarz, and C.M. Melas, `An Adaptive RAMDFE for Storage Channels’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. COM-39, No. 11, pp. 1559–1568, Nov. 1991.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    G.D. Forney, Jr., `Maximum-Likelihood Sequence Estimation of Digital Sequences in the Presence of Intersymbol Interference’, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. IT-18, No. 3, pp. 363–378, May 1972.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    G.D. Forney and M.V. Eyuboglu, `Combined Equalization and Coding Using Precoding’, IEEE Commun. Magaz., pp. 25–34, Dec. 1991.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    P.J. van Gerwen, `On the Generation and Application of Pseudo-Ternary Codes in Pulse Transmission’, Philips Res. Rept., Vol. 20, pp. 469–484, Aug. 1965.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    P.J. van Gerwen, N.A.M. Verhoeckx, and T.A.C.M. Claasen, `Design Considerations for a 144 kb/s Digital Transmission Unit for the Local Telephone Network’, IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. SAC-2, pp. 314–323, March 1984.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    H. Harashima and H. Miyakawa, `Matched-Transmission Technique for Channels with Intersymbol Interference’, IEEE Trans. Commun. Technol., Vol. COM-20, pp. 774–780, Aug. 1972.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    P. Kabal and S. Pasupathy, `Partial-Response Signaling’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. COM-23, No. 9, pp. 921–934, Sept. 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    J.G. Kenney, L.R. Carley and R.W. Wood, `Multi-Level Decision Feedback Equalization for Saturation Recording’, IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 2160–2171, July 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    H. Kobayashi, `Application of Probabilistic Decoding to Digital Magnetic Recording Systems’, IBM J. Res. Develop., pp. 64–74, Jan. 1971.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    E.R. Kretzmer, `Generalization of a Technique for Binary Data Transmission’, IEEE Trans. Commun. Technol., Vol. COM-14, pp. 67–68, Feb. 1966.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    R. Laroia, S.A. Tretter, and N. Farvardin, `A Simple and Effective Precoding Scheme for Noise Whitening on Intersymbol Interference Channels’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. COM-41, No. 10, pp. 1460–1463, Oct. 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    A. Lender, `The Duobinary Technique for High-Speed Data Transmission’, IEEE Trans. on Commun. Electron., Vol. 82, pp. 214–218, May 1963.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    J.-Y. Lin and C.-H. Wei, `Adaptive Nonlinear Decision Feedback Equalization with Channel Estimation and Timing Recovery in Digital Magnetic Recording Systems’, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. -II, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 196–206, March 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    R.C. Mathes, U.S. Patent 1 295 553, Feb. 25, 1919.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    D.G. Messerschmitt, `Design of a Finite Impulse Response for the Viterbi Algorithm and Decision-Feedback Equalizer’, Proc. ICC’74, Minneapolis, MN, June 17–19, 1974.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    D.G. Messerschmitt, `Generalized Partial Response for Equalized Channels with Rational Spectra’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. COM-23, No. 11, pp. 1251–1258, Nov. 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    P. Monsen, `Feedback Equalization for Fading Dispersive Channels’, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. IT-17, pp. 56–64, Jan. 1971.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    E.A. Newcombe and S. Pasupathy, `Effects of Filtering Allocation on the Performance of a Modified Duobinary System’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. COM-28, No. 5, pp. 749–752, May 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    B.R. Petersen and D.D. Falconer, `Minimum Mean-Square Equalization in Cyclostationary and Stationary Interference–Analysis and Subscriber Line Calculations’, IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. SAC-9, No. 6, pp. 931–940, Aug. 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    R. Price, Nonlinearly Feedback-Equalized PAM vs. Capacity for Noisy Filter Channels’, Proc. ICC’74, Minneapolis, MN, June 17–19, 1974.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    J.J. O’Reilly and A.M. de Oliveira Duarte, `Error Propagation in Decision Feedback Receivers’, IEE Proc., Vol. 132, Pt. F, No. 7, pp. 561–566, Dec. 1985.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    J. Salz, `Optimum Mean-Square Decision Feedback Equalization’, Bell Syst. Tech. J., Vol. 52, No. 8, pp. 1341–1373, Oct. 1973.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    H.K. Thapar and A.M. Patel, `A Class of Partial Response Systems for Increasing Storage Density in Magnetic Recording’, IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. MAG-23, No. 5, pp. 3666–3668, Sept. 1987.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    M. Tomlinson, `New Automatic Equalizer Employing Modulo Arithmetic’, Electron. Lett., Vol. 7, Nos. 5 /6, pp. 138–139, March 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan W. M. Bergmans
    • 1
  1. 1.Philips ResearchEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations