Characteristics of Digital Baseband Transmission

  • Jan W. M. Bergmans


Digital transmission systems usually transport information in a band of restricted width that is centered around some carrier frequency. The carrier frequency is typically large with respect to the bandwidth of the information-bearing signal, but in some cases (notably in certain voiceband data modems) it is of the same order of magnitude. The distinguishing feature of baseband transmission is that the carrier frequency is zero, i.e. that data is transmitted in a band around DC. As exemplified in Chapter 2, this approach is well-suited for channels that only pass frequencies near DC, such as wire pairs and digital recording channels.


Power Spectral Density Matched Filter Noise Power Spectral Density Intersymbol Interference Excess Bandwidth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    K. Abend and B.D. Fritchmann, `Statistical Detection for Communication Channels with Intersymbol Interference’, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 58, pp. 779–785, May 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions. New York: Dover Publications, 1972.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J.W.M. Bergmans, Discrete-Time Models for Digital Magnetic Recording’, Philips J. Res., Vol. 41, pp. 531–558, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J.A.C. Bingham, ‘Multicarrier Modulation for Data Transmission: An Idea Whose Time Has Come’, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 5–14, May 1990.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R.W. Chang and J.C. Hancock, `On Receiver Structures for Channels Having Memory’, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. 12, pp. 463–468, Oct. 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J.M. Cioffi, G.P. Dudevoir, M.V. Eyuboglu and G.D. Forney, Jr., `MMSE Decision-Feedback Equalization and Coding-Part II: Coding Results’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 43, No. 10, pp. 2595–2604, Oct. 1995.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    T.M. Cover and J.A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory. New York: John Wiley, 1991.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    G.D. Forney, Jr., `Maximum-Likelihood Sequence Estimation of Digital Sequences in the Presence of Intersymbol Interference’, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. 18, pp. 363378, May 1972.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    G.D. Forney, Jr., R.G. Gallager, G.R. Lang, F.M. Longstaff and S.U.H. Qureshi, `Efficient Modulation for Band-Limited Channels’, IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 632–647, Sept. 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    G.D. Forney, Jr., ‘Coset Codes-Part I: Introduction and Geometrical Classification’, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. 34, pp. 1123–1151, Sept. 1988.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    G.D. Forney, Jr., and M.V. Eyuboglu, `Combined Equalization and Coding Using Precoding’, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 25–34, Dec. 1991.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    R.G. Gallager, Information Theory and Reliable Communication. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1968.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    R.V.L. Hartley, `Transmission of Information’, Bell Syst. Tech. J., Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 535–563, July 1928.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    C. Heegard and L. Ozarow, `Bounding the Capacity of Saturation Recording: The Lorentz Model and Applications’, IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 145–156, Jan. 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    M.C. Jeruchim, `Techniques for Estimating the Bit Error Rate in the Simulation of Digital Communication Systems’, IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun., Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 153170, Jan. 1984.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    H. Kobayashi, `Application of Probabilistic Decoding to Digital Magnetic Recording Systems’, IBM J. Res. Develop., Vol. 15, pp. 64–74, Jan. 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    E.A. Lee and D.G. Messerschmitt, Digital Communication. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    F.R. Magee, Jr., and J.G. Proakis, `An Estimate of the Upper Bound on Error Probability for Maximum-Likelihood Sequence Estimation on Channels Having a Finite-Duration Pulse Response’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 21, pp. 699–702, Sept. 1973.Google Scholar
  19. J.L. Massey, `The How and Why of Channel Coding’, Proc. 1984 International Zürich Seminar on Digital Communications,pp. 67–73, Zürich, Switzerland, March 6–8, 1984.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    H. Meyr, M. Oerder, and A. Polydoros, `On Sampling Rate, Analog Prefiltering, and Sufficient Statistics for Digital Receivers’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 42, No. 12, pp. 3208–3214, Dec. 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    D.O. North, `Analysis of the Factors which Determine Signal/Noise Discrimination in Radar’, RCA Laboratories, Princeton, N.J., Rept. PTR-6C, June 1943.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    J.K. Omura, `On Optimum Receivers for Channels with Intersymbol Interference’, (Abstract), presented at the IEEE Int. Symp. Information Theory, Noordwijk, Holland, June 1970.Google Scholar
  23. R. Price, `Nonlinearly Feedback-Equalized PAM VS. Capacity, for Noisy Filter Channels’, in Rec. Int. Conf. Commun.,72, pp. 2212–2217.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    J.G. Proakis, Digital Communications. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983 (2nd ed. 1989 ).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    C.E. Shannon, `A Mathematical Theory of Communication’, Bell Syst. Tech. J., Vol. 27, pp. 379–423, 623–656, Oct. 1948.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    C.E. Shannon, `Communication in the Presence of Noise’, Proc. IRE, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 10–21, Jan. 1949.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    G. Ungerboeck, `Adaptive Maximum-Likelihood Receiver for Carrier-Modulated Data-Transmission Systems’, IEEE Trans. Commun., Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 624–636, May 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    G. Ungerboeck, `Channel Coding with Multilevel/Phase Signals’, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. 28, pp. 55–67, Jan. 1982.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    G. Ungerboeck, `Trellis-Coded Modulation with Redundant Signal Sets-Part I: Introduction’, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 5–11, Feb. 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    G. Ungerboeck, `Trellis-Coded Modulation with Redundant Signal Sets-Part II: State of the Art’, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 12–21, Feb. 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    A.J. Viterbi, `Error Bounds for Convolutional Codes and an Asymptotically Optimum Decoding Algorithm’, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. 13, pp. 260–269, Apr. 1967.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    J. van Vleck and D. Middleton, `A Theoretical Comparison of the Visual, Aural and Meter Reception of Pulsed Signals in the Presence of Noise’, J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 17, pp. 940–971, Nov. 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    J.M. Wozencraft and I.M. Jacobs, Principles of Communication Engineering. New York: Wiley, 1965.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan W. M. Bergmans
    • 1
  1. 1.Philips ResearchEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations