Methodology for the Extraction, Purification, and Determination of Plant Growth Substances

  • Richard N. Arteca


Plant growth substances are involved in nearly all aspects of the plant’s life cycle as deduced from the fact that exogenous applications by them profoundly affect plant responses. However, it is difficult to detect plant growth substances within the plant for numerous reasons. At the present time it is not known whether plant growth substances act at certain levels in a dose-dependent manner or if they remain constant, while changes in tissue sensitivity (receptors) are more closely related to a given response. Our knowledge in the area of plant growth substances is still quite limited and the major reason is that the techniques for their analysis are still very cumbersome. There are many methods for extracting, purifying, and quantifying plant growth substances; however, it is not the intent in this section to provide an exhaustive review of the literature in the area. This chapter is intended to be a basic outline of all steps from tissue preparation through final identification and quantification of plant growth substances. However, for detailed protocols see Rivier and Crozier (1987) and Hedden (1993).


Ammonium Sulphate Polyclonal Antiserum Plant Growth Substance Solvent Partitioning Immobilize Antigen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, J. M. (1986). “Fluorescent hydrazides for the high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of biological carbonyls”. Anal. Biochem. 152: 146–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bieleski, W. J. (1964). “The problem of halting enzyme action when extracting plant tissues”. Anal. Biochem. 9: 431–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boerjan, W., Genetello, C., van Montagu, M., and Inzé, D. (1992). “A new bioassay for auxins and cytokinins”. Plant Physiol. 99: 1090–1109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crozier, A., Loferski, K., Zaerr, J. B., and Morris, R. O. (1980). “Analysis of picogram quantities of indole-3-acetic acid by high performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence procedures”. Planta 150: 366–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fujioka, S., Yamane, H., Spray, C. R., Gaskin, P., and MacMillan, J. (1988). “Qualitative and quantitative analysis of gibberellins in vegetative shoots of normal dwarf-1, dwarf-2, dwarf-3, and dwarf-5 seedlings of Zea mays L. ”. Plant Physiol. 88: 1367–1372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gamoh, K., Sawamoto, H., Takatsuto, S., Watabe, Y., and Arimoto, H. (1990). “Ferroceneboronic acid as a derivatization reagent for the determination of brassinosteroids by high-performance liquid-chromatography with electro-chemical detection”. J. Chromato. 515: 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hedden, P. (1993). “Modern methods for the quantitative analysis of plant hormones”. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol Plant Mol. Biol. 44: 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kohout, L., Zhabinskii, V. N., and Litvinovskaya, R. P. (1991). “Types of brassinosteroids and their bioassays”. In Brassinosteroids. Chemistry, Bioactivity, and Applications, eds., H. G. Cutler, T. Yokata, and G. Adam, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Laloue, M., Terrine, C., and Gawer, M. (1974). “Cytokinins: Formation of the nucleoside-5-triphosphate in tobacco and Acer cells”. FEBS Letts. 46: 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Law, D. M. and Hamilton, R. H. (1982). “A rapid isotope dilution method for analysis of indole-3-acetic acid and indoleacetyl aspartic acid from small amounts of plant tissue”. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 106: 1035–1041.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moritz, T., Schneider, G., and Jensen, E. (1992). “Capillary liquid chromatography/fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry of gibberellin glucosyl conjugates”. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 21: 554–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Östin, A., Mortiz, T., and Sandberg, G. (1992). “Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry of conjugates and oxidative metabolites of indole-3-acetic acid”. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 21: 292–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Powell, L. and Maybee, C. (1985). “Hormone analysis employing `Baker’-10 SPET”“ disposable columns”. Plant Physiol. 77: 76.Google Scholar
  14. Rivier, L. and Crozier, A. (1987). Principles and Practice of Plant Hormone Analysis, Volumes 1 and 2, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  15. Walker, J. M. and Cox, M. (1988). The Language of Biotechnology: A Dictionary of Terms, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  16. Wang, T. L. (1986). Immunology in Plant Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  17. Wright, M. and Doherty, P. (1985). “Auxin levels in single half nodes of Avena fatua estimated using high performance liquid chromatography with coulometric detection”. J. Plant Growth Reg. 4: 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yopp, J. H., Aung, L. H. and Steffens, G. L. (1986). Bioassays and Other Special Techniques for Plant Hormones and Plant Growth Regulators, Plant Growth Regulator Society of America, Lake Alfred, FL.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard N. Arteca
    • 1
  1. 1.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations