Instrumentation Off the Shelf or on Your Own

  • Robert Remien

Abstract

Measurement and instrumentation are often viewed as minor considerations in the broader picture of research design, but they can be crucial to your project’s potential success. The quality of your research will depend on the quality of the data you collect, which, in turn, will depend on the psychometric properties of the measures you use. Many prospective applicants have struggled with issues concerning measurement and instrumentation. You may have confronted problems as you searched for available measures and tried to decide which ones were appropriate for your population. You may also have concluded that none of them were appropriate or could be adapted for your study and decided to design measures of your own.

Keywords

Psychometric Property Personality Disorder Broad Picture Source Book Symptom Rating Scale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Freeman, C., Tyrer, P. 1989. Research Methods in Psychiatry: A Beginner’s Guide. London: Gaskell, The Royal College of Psychiatrists ( Distributed in North America by American Psychiatric Press, Inc.).Google Scholar

Additional Reading

  1. Bums, O. C., ed. 1972. The Seventh Mental Measurements Yearbook. Highland Park,NJ: Gryphon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Corcoran, K., Fischer, J. 1987. Measures for Clinical Practice: A Sourcebook. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Huang K. H. C., Watters, J. K., Case, P. 1988. Psychological assessment and AIDS research with intravenous drug users: Challenges in measurement. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 20: 191–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Israel, L., Kozarenic, D., Sartorius, N. 1984. Source Book of Geriatric Assessment Volume I: Evaluations in Gerontology. New York: Karger.Google Scholar
  5. Israel, L., Kozarenic, D., Sartorius, N. 1984. Source Book of Geriatric Assessment Volume 2: Review of Analyzed Instruments. New York: Karger.Google Scholar
  6. Lettieri, D. J., Nelson, J. E., Sayers, M. A., eds. 1985. NIAAA Treatment Handbook Series 2: Alcoholism Treatment Assessment Research Instruments. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  7. Marsella, A. J., Hirschfeld, R. M. A., Ratz, M. M., eds. 1987. The Measurement of Depression. New York: Guilford Press. Rabkin, J. G. 1994. Self-rating scales for depression: Description and critique. Review prepared for the NIMH Depression Awareness, Treatment Program.Google Scholar
  8. Van Riezen, H., Segal, M. 1988. Comparative Evaluations of Rating Scales for Clinical Psychopharmacology. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Remien

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations