Derivatives and Stock Market Volatility: Is Additional Government Regulation Necessary?

  • Seha M. Tiniç
Chapter
Part of the Financial and Monetary Policy Studies book series (FMPS, volume 30)

Abstract

Financial institutions and markets occupy a pivotal position in the economy through their role in allocating funds and as the core of the payment systems. Moreover, financial intermediaries are in a unique position of trust in managing funds belonging to the general public. These considerations have led governments to legislate a plethora of regulations that are designed to enhance or maintain public confidence in financial markets. To a large degree, this regulatory emphasis reflects the worry that failure of financial intermediaries and chaotic episodes in securities markets can impair public confidence in t he financial system, which may lead to a massive withdrawal of funds from financial intermediaries. Obviously, such a crisis would cause a serious breakdown of the financial system in which not only investors would lose, but the entire economy would suffer. However, government regulation of the securities markets also reflects the concern for the protection of investors whose savings are invested either directly in the securities markets or entrusted to profesionally managed financial intermediaries.

Keywords

Stock Market Stock Return Security Market Financial Intermediary Derivative Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bank of England. Derivatives: Report of an Internal Working Group. London. April 1993.Google Scholar
  2. Benston, G. “Required Disclosure and the Stock Market: An Evaluation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.”American Economic Review 63 (March 1973) 132–155.Google Scholar
  3. Broad, J., Charles Goodhart, and Charles Sutcliffe. “Inter-Market Volatility Linkages: The London Stock Exchange and London International Financial Futures Exchange.” Working paper, London School of Economics, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, K.C., W. Van Harlow, and Seha M. Tinic. “Risk Aversion, Uncertain Information, and Market Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics 22 (December 1988) 355–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards, F. R. “Does Futures Trading Increase Stock Volatility?” Financial Analysts’ Journal 44 (January/ February 1988 ), 63–69.Google Scholar
  6. Flood, R.P. and Robert J. Hodrick, “On Testing Speculative Bubbles,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4 Spring 1990, 85–101.Google Scholar
  7. Group of Thirty. Derivatives Practices and Principles. Washington, D.C. July 1993.Google Scholar
  8. King, Mervyn, and Sushil Wadhwani. “Transmission of Volatility Between Stock Markets.” Discussion paper, London School of Economics, 1988.Google Scholar
  9. Magnusson, Paul. “The IMF Should Look Forward, Not Back.” Business Week, October 3, 1994 p. 48. Miller, Merton H. “Leverage.” Journal of Finance 46 (June 1991) 479–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nelson, D. B. “Commentary: Price Volatility, International Market Links, and their Implications for Regulatory Policies.” Journal of Financial Services Research 3 (1989) 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Recent Developments in International Interbank Relations. Report Prepared by a Working Group of the Central Banks of the Group of Ten Countries BIS, Basle, Switzerland, October 1992.Google Scholar
  12. Roll, R. “The International Crash of October 1987.” Financial Analysts’ Journal 44 (September 1988), 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Roll, R. “Price Volatility, International Market Links, and Their Implications for Regulatory Policies.”Journal of Financial Services Research 3 (1989) 113–148.Google Scholar
  14. Schwert, G. W. “Stock Market Volatility.” Working paper, New York Stock Exchange, December 1989.Google Scholar
  15. Schwert, G. W. “Indexes of U.S. Stock Prices from 1802 to 1987.” Journal of Business 63 (July 1990) 399–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shiller, R.J., Market Volatility, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  17. Simon, C. J. “The Effects of the 1933 Securities Act on Investor Information and the Performance of New Issues.”American Economic Review 79 (June 1989), 295–318.Google Scholar
  18. Skinner, D.J. “Options Markets and Stock Return Volatility.” Journal of Financial Economics 23 (June 1989), 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith, C.W., Jr., C.W. Smithson, and D.S. Wilford. Managing Financial Risk. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers. 1990.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, R.L., and Vaugn S. Armstrong. “Misperceptions About Private Placement Discounts: Why Market Reaction to Rule 144A Has Been Lukewarm.” In: K. Lehn and R. Kamphuis, eds., Modernizing U.S. Securities Regulation: Economic and Legal Perspectives. Pittsburgh, PA: Joseph M. Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, December 1992, pp. 153–170.Google Scholar
  21. Stoll, H. and R.E. Whaley. “Program Trading and Expiration-day Effects.” Financial Analysts’ Journal 43 (March/April 1987 ), 16–28.Google Scholar
  22. Sylla, W. “Financial Market Panics and Volatility in the Long Run, 1830–1988.” In: E.N. White, ed.. Crises and Panics: The Lessons of History. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones Irwin. 1990.Google Scholar
  23. U.S. General Accounting Office. Financial Derivatives: Actions Needed to Protect the Financial System. Washington, DC. May 1994.Google Scholar
  24. U.S. Report Issues Warning on Derivatives.“ Wall Street Journal, May 19, 1994, p. 19.Veribanc News Release, June 27, 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seha M. Tiniç
    • 1
  1. 1.Koc UniversityIstinye, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations