Bacterial Evolution

  • Edward A. Birge


One of the exciting changes in bacterial genetics that has occurred in the past decade is the development of methods and information permitting the study of real evolutionary genetics with respect to bacteria. Sufficient data are available to permit researchers to address problems similar to those that for many years have held the interest of geneticists studying eukaryotic organisms. Although the bacterial evolutionary situation is not totally understood, our present comprehension has shed new light on classic problems in genetics and offers the promise of even more interesting results in the years to come.


Codon Usage Evolutionary Tree Synonymous Codon Codon Preference Rhodobacter Capsulatus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



  1. Crawford, LP., Milkman, R. (1991). Orthologous and paralogous divergence, reticulate evolution, and lateral gene transfer in bacterial trp genes, pp. 77–95, In Selander, R.K., Clark, A.G., Whittam, T.S. (eds.), Evolution at the Molecular Level. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press. (A new edition of a classic book on evolutionary molecular biology. Most examples are not bacterial, but the point of view is an important one. For insights into how the scientific process works, don’t miss the endnotes.)Google Scholar
  3. Stewart, C.-B. (1993). The powers and pitfalls of parsimony. Nature 361:603–607. (A very clear discussion on how to prepare evolutionary trees.)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar


  1. Benachenhou-Lahfa, N., Forterre, P., Labedan, B. (1993). Evolution of glutamate dehydrogenase genes: Evidence for two paralogous protein families and unusual branching patterns of the archaebacteria in the universal tree of life. Journal of Molecular Evolution 36:335–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Mikkola, R., Kurland, CG. (1992). Selection of laboratory wild-type phenotype from natural isolates of Escherichia coli in chemostats. Molecular Biology and Evolution 9:394–402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Milkman, R., Bridges, M.M. (1993). Molecular evolution of the Escherichia coli chromosome. IV. Sequence comparisons. Genetics 133:455–468.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Steel, M.A., Lockhart, P.J., Penny, D. (1993). Confidence in evolutionary trees from biological sequence data. Nature 364:440–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Vingron, M., Waterman, M.S. (1994). Sequence alignment and penalty choice. Review of concepts, case studies, and implications. Journal of Molecular Biology 235:1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Williamson, R.M., Hetherington, J., Jackson, J.H. (1993). Detection of fundamental principles and a level of order for large-scale gene clustering on the Escherichia coli chromosome. Journal of Molecular Evolution 36:347–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Woese, CR., Kandier, O., Wheelis, M.L. (1990). Towards a natural system of organisms: Proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria and Eucarya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 87:4576–4579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Wu, L.-F., Saier Jr., M.H. (1991). Differences in codon usage among genes encoding proteins of different function in Rhodobacter capsulatus. Research in Microbiology 142:943–949.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward A. Birge
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations