Skip to main content
  • 55 Accesses

Abstract

Ever since the advent of computers, people have been intrigued by the possibility of making computers exhibit behavior similar to the general intelligent capabilities of humans. Since the early fifties of this century, this goal is being addressed in the subdiscipline of computer science that has come to be known under the name of Artificial Intelligence (AI) [Charniak and McDermott, 1985; Winston, 1992]. We can define the goal of this discipline in a general fashion as the construction of computer models of behavior that is regarded as intelligent in humans. Over the course of AI’s history, the kinds of behavior that have been studied have varied, and there is no universally accepted position on what form the computer model is to take, and whether it is to be regarded as an embodiment of intelligence or, as the author believes, merely an operational description of intelligence (see [Morik, 1992, ch. 1]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. If, as in our case, the system’s knowledge is represented by a logical theory, this problem is also called theory revision.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Many authors use the term logic for a knowledge representation system defined in this fashion.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Our use of the term concept formation is thus more general than the definition used by Gennari et. al. [Gennari et al, 1989] who included the additional requirement of forming a hierarchical organization, and also restricted the term to divisive, hill-climbing methods.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The new name, of course, was provided by the user, the system had just used conceptl.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wrobel, S. (1994). Introduction. In: Concept Formation and Knowledge Revision. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2317-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2317-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5146-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2317-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics