Fruit Flies pp 323-328 | Cite as

Fruit Fly Eradication in Hawaii: Environmental Considerations for Unique Island Ecosystems

  • R. H. Messing
Conference paper


Because of direct crop losses, marketing restrictions, and the threat of infestation to the U.S. mainland, an ambitious program in Hawaii is being directed towards the elimination of four tephritid species: Dacus cucurbitae (Coquillet), Dacus dorsalis (Hendel), Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann), and Dacus latifrons (Hendel). USDA-ARS is currently conducting pilot tests to demonstrate the feasibility of eradication and to document environmental safety of various control methods, beginning on the island of Kauai.


Gall Midge Methyl Eugenol Tephritid Species Sterile Insect Release Male Annihilation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. CICP. 1987. Environmental impact statement for the eradication of the tri–fly complex from the state of Hawaii. Consortium for International Crop Protection, USDA/APHIS contract # 53–3294–3–24. 308 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Ehler, L. E. and Endicott, P.C. 1984. Effect of malathion-bait sprays on biological control of insects pests of olive, citrus, and walnut. Hilgardia 52: 1–47.Google Scholar
  3. Ehler, L. E., Endicott, P.C., Hertlein, M.B., and Alvarado-Rodriguez, B. 1984. Medfly eradication in California: impact of malathion-bait sprays on an endemic gall midge and its parasitoids. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 36: 202–208.Google Scholar
  4. Howarth, F. G. 1990. Hawaiian terrestrial arthropods: an overview. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 30: 4–26.Google Scholar
  5. Howarth, F. G. 1987. Evolutionary ecology of subterranean and aeolian habitats in Hawaii. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2: 220–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gary, N. and Mussen, E. 1984. Impact of Mediterranean fruit fly malathion bait spray on honey bees. Environ. Entomol. 13: 711–717.Google Scholar
  7. Kaneshiro, K.Y. and Boake, C.R. 1987. Sexual selection and speciation: issues raised by Hawaiian Drosophila. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2: 207–212.Google Scholar
  8. Montgomery, S.L. 1983. Carnivorous caterpillars: the behavior, biogeography, and conservation of Eupithecia in the Hawaiian islands. Geojournal 7: 549–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Stark, J.D., Vargas, RI., and Thalman, R.K. 1990. Azadirachtin effects on metamorphosis, longevity, and reproduction of three tephritid fruit fly species. J. Econ. Entomol., in press Google Scholar
  10. Suda, D.Y. and Cunningham, RT. 1970. Chiysopa basalis captured in plastic traps baited with methyl eugenol. J. Econ. Entomol. 63: 1706.Google Scholar
  11. Umeya, K. and Hirao, J. 1975. Attraction of the jackfruit fly, Dacus umbrosus and Lacewing, Cluysopa sp. by lure traps baited with methyl eugenol and cue lure in the Philippines. Appl. Ent. Zool. 10: 60–62.Google Scholar
  12. Wong, T.T.Y., Ramadan, M.M., McInnis, D.O., Mochizuki, M., and Herr, J.C. Augmentative releases of Diachasmimorpha rryoni (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to suppress a Mediterranean fruit fly population in Kula, Maui, Hawaii. Environ. Entomol. (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. H. Messing

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations