Technology Transfer and Medfly Mass Production
A diet designed to serve as a larval initiation medium for Mediterranean fruit fly rearing was developed at the FAO/IAEA pilot plant at Seibersdorf, Austria. We report on the evaluation and transfer of larval starter diet and re-processed diet technologies under large-scale operations at the mass-production facility of San Miguel Petapa, Guatemala.
KeywordsSugar Cane Bagasse Wheat Bran Pupal Weight Starter Diet Diet Code
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bruzzone, N.D., Economopoulos, A.P., and Hua-Song, W. Mass rearing of Ceratitis capitata: reuse of the finisher larval diet. Entomol. Exp. Appl. (in press).Google Scholar
- Economopoulos, A.P., Al-Taweel, A.A., and Bruzzone, N.D. Larval diet with a starter phase for mass-rearing Ceratitis capitata: substitution and refinement in the use of yeasts and sugars. Entomol. Exp. Appt. (in press).Google Scholar
- Fay, H.A.C., 1988. A starter diet for mass-rearing larvae of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wied.). J. Appl. Entomol. 105: 496–501.Google Scholar
- International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF), 1980. Microbial Ecology of Foods. I. Factors Affecting Life and Death of Microorganisms. Acad. Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Monro, J. 1966. In: IAEA Laboratory Activities. Third Report. IAEA, Vienna: p. 65.Google Scholar
- Monro, J. 1968. Improvements in mass rearing the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wied.). IAEA, Vienna. STI/PUB/185: 91–184.Google Scholar
- Nadel, D.J., 1965. In: Advances in insect population control by the sterile-male technique. Technical report series N. 44. IAEA: 14–17.Google Scholar
- Nadel, D.J., 1970. Current mass-rearing techniques for the Mediterranean fruit fly. In: Sterile Male Technique for Control of Fruit Flies. IAEA STI/PUB/276, Vienna. 13–18.Google Scholar
- Schwarz, A.J., Zambada, A., Orozco, D.H.S., Zavala, J.L., Calkins, C.O., 1985: Mass production of the Mediterranean fruit fly at Metapa, Mexico. Florida Entomol. 68: 467–477.Google Scholar