Fruit Flies pp 65-69 | Cite as

Effect of Phenology on Allele Frequency Divergence in Apple Maggot Fly Populations

  • B. A. McPheron
  • H.-Y. Han
Conference paper


Recent electrophoretic studies have documented host-associated genetic differences in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella, from sympatric hawthorn and apple trees (Feder et al., 1988; McPheron et al., 1988) These demonstrations of the apparent widespread existence of host races have rekindled interest in possible mechanisms responsible for the lack of free interbreeding between fly populations on different hosts. Prokopy et al. (1988) evaluated host selection by flies from the two hosts and, although their findings demonstrate very complex behavioral patterns, found significant differences between the host races in acceptability of apple as a host. Smith (1988a and Smith McPheron, and Berlocher, unpublished) demonstrated that flies from apple and hawthorn have genetically-determined differences in time required for eclosion following diapause. Further, this time difference is correlated with the availability of suitable host fruits for oviposition.


Allele Frequency Distribution Allele Frequency Divergence Host Race Allele Class Mannose Phosphate Isomerase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bush, G.L. 1969. Sympatric host race formation and speciation in frugivorous flies of the genus rhagoletis (Diptera, Tephritidae). Evolution 23: 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bush, G.L. 1975. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous parasitic insects. Pp. 187–206 in P.W. Price (ed.). Evolutionary Strategies of Parasitic Insects and Mites. Plenum Publ. Co., NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bush, G.L., Feder, J.L., Berlocher, S.H., McPheron, B.A., Smith, D.C. and Chilcote, C.A. 1989. Sympatric origins of R. pomonella. Nature 339: 346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carson, H.L. 1989. Sympatric pest. Nature 338: 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feder, J.L., Chilcote, C.A. and Bush, G.L. 1988. Genetic differentiation between sympatric host races of Rhagoletis pomonella. Nature 336: 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feder, J.L., Chilcote, C.A. and Bush, G.L. 1989. Inheritance and linkage relationships of allozymes in the apple maggot fly. J. Hered. 80: 277–283.Google Scholar
  7. Feder, J.L., Chilcote, C.A. and Bush, G.L. 1990. The geographic pattern of genetic differentiation between host associated populations of Rhagoletis pomonella ( Diptera: Tephritidae) in the eastern United States and Canada. Evolution 44: 570–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McPheron, B.A. 1990. Genetic structure of apple maggot fly ( Diptera: Tephritidae) populations. Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 83: 568–577.Google Scholar
  9. McPheron, B.A., Smith, D.C. and Berlocher, S.H. 1988. Genetic differences between host races of the apple maggot fly. Nature 336: 64–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pickett, A.D. and Neary, M.E. 1940. Further studies on Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh). Sci. Agr. 20: 551–556.Google Scholar
  11. Prokopy, R.J., Diehl, S.R. and Cooley, S.S. 1988. Behavioral evidence for host races in Rhagoletis pomonella flies. Oecologia 76: 138–147.Google Scholar
  12. Smith, D.C. 1988a. Heritable divergence of Rhagoletis pomonella host races by seasonal asynchrony. Nature 336: 66–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith, D.C. 1988b. Reproductive differences between Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae) fruit parasites of Cornus amomun: and C. Florida (Cornaceae). J.N.Y. Ent. Soc. 96: 327–331.Google Scholar
  14. Swofford, D.L. and Selander, R.B. 1981. BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J. Hered. 72: 281–283.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. A. McPheron
  • H.-Y. Han

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations