Advertisement

The Design of Manufacturing Systems

  • George Chryssolouris
Part of the Springer Texts in Mechanical Engineering book series (MES)

Abstract

The manufacture of products in the modern industrial world requires the combined and coordinated efforts of people, machinery, and equipment. Thus, a manufacturing system can be defined as a combination of humans, machinery and equipment that are bound by a common material and information flow. The materials input to a manufacturing system are raw materials and energy. Information is also input to a manufacturing system, in the form of customer demand for the system’s products. The outputs of a manufacturing system can likewise be divided into materials, such as finished goods and scrap, and information, such as measures of system performance.

Keywords

Decision Variable Manufacturing System Goal Node Flexible Manufacture System Hill Climbing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Primrose, P.L. and R. Leonard, “The Use of a Conceptual Model to Evaluate Financially Flexible Manufacturing System Projects,” Flexible Manufacturing Systems Current Issues and Models (1986). Choobineh, F. and R. Suri, Editors. Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 282–288.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Williamson, I.P., “Justification in a Strategic Context,” International Conference on Factory 2000 (1988), pp. 413–419.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choobineh, F., “Justification of Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” Flexible Manufacturing Systems Current Issues and Models (1986). Choobineh, F. and R. Suri, Editors. Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Atlanta, GA, pp. 269281.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Primrose, P.L. and R. Leonard, “Conditions Under Which Flexible Manufacturing is Financially Viable,” Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Flexible Manufacturing Systems (1984), pp. 121–132.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Son, Y.K. and Chan S.P., “Quantifying Opportunity Costs Associated With Adding Manufacturing Flexibility,” International Journal of Production Research (Vol. 28, No. 7, 1990 ), pp. 1183–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Muther, R., Systematic Planning of Industrial Facilities, Management and Industrial Publications, Kansas City, Missouri, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Muther, R. and E.J. Phillips, “Facility Planners Cite Clear Objectives And Proper Input Data As Main Success Factors,” Industrial Engineering (March 1983), pp. 4448.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tompkins, J.A. and J.D. Spain, “Utilization Of Spine Concept Maximizes Modularity In Facilities Design,” Industrial Engineering (March 1983), pp. 34–42.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Winston, W.L., Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms, Duxbury Press, Boston, 1987.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bronson, R., Schaum’s Outline of Theory and Problems of Operations Research, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gross, D. and C.M. Harris, Fundamentals of Queueing Theory, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Winston, P.H., Artificial Intelligence, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kohonen, T., Self—Organization and Associative Memory, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1984.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lippmann, R. P., “An Introduction to Computing with Neural Nets,” IEEE ASSP Magazine (April 1987).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hecht-Nielsen, R., Neurocomputing, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1990.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dutta, S., and S. Shekhar, “Bond Rating: A Non-Conservative Application of Neural Networks,” IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (Vol. 2, 1988 ), pp. 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Soulie, F.F., P. Gallinari, Y. Le Cun, and S. Thiria, “Evaluation of Neural Network Architectures on Test Learning Tasks,” IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (Vol. 2, 1987 ), pp. 653–660.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rumelhart, D.E., G.E. Hinton and R.J. Williams, “Learning Internal Representation by Error Propagation,” in Rumelhart, D.E. and J.L. McClelland, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition (Vol. 1, 1986 ), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 318–362.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Law, A.M. and W.D. Kelton, Simulation Modeling and Analysis, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1991.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Phadke, M.S., Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1989.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Law, A., “Introduction to Simulation: A Powerful Tool for Analyzing Complex Manufacturing Systems,” Industrial Engineering (Vol. 5, 1986 ), pp. 46–59.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Law, A.M. and M.G. Mccomas, “Pitfalls to Avoid in the Simulation of Manufacturing Systems,” Industrial Engineering (Vol. 5, No. 5, 1989 ), p. 28.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Miller, D.M., and R.P. Davis, “The Machine Requirements Problem,” International Journal of Production Research (Vol. 15, 1977 ), p. 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shubin, J.A. and H. Madeheim, Plant Layout, Prentice-Hall, New York, 1951.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Apple, J.M., Plant Layout and Material Handling, The Ronald Press Company, New York, 1950.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Francis, R.L. and J.A. White, Facility Layout and Location: An Analytical Approach, Prentice-Hall, New York, 1974.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morris, W.T., “Facilities Planning,” Journal of Industrial Engineering (Vol. 9, 1958 ).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reed, R., Jr., Plant Layout: Factors, Principles, and Techniques, R. D. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois, 1961.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miller, D.M., and R.P. Davis, “A Dynamic Resource Allocation Model for a Machine Requirements Problem,” AILE Transactions (Vol. 10, No. 3, 1978 ), pp. 237–243.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kusiak, A., “The Production Equipment Requirements Problem,” International Journal of Production Research (Vol. 25, No. 3, 1987 ), pp. 319–325.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ueno, N., S. Sotojima, and J. Takeda, “Simulation-Based Approach to Design a Multi-Stage Flow-Shop in Steel Works,” Proceedings of the 24th Annual Simulation Symposium (1991) IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Angeles, California. pp. 332–337.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Suri, R. and R.R. Hildebrant, “Modelling Flexible Manufacturing Systems Using Mean Value Analysis,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems (Vol. 3, No. 1, 1984 ), pp. 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lawler, E.L., “The Quadratic Assignment Problem,” Management Science (Vol. 9, 1963 ), p. 586.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gavett, J.W. and N.V. Plyter, “The Optimal Assignment of Facilities to Locations by Branch and Bound,” Operations Research (Vol. 14, 1966 ), p. 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Graves, G.W. and A.B. Whinston, “An Algorithm for the Quadratic Assignment Problem,” Management Science (Vol. 17, 1970 ), p. 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kaufmann, L. and F. Broeckx, “An Algorithm for the Quadratic Assignment Problem Using Benders’ Decomposition,” European Journal of Operations Research (Vol. 2, 1978 ), p. 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bazaraa, M.S. and H.D. Sherali, “Bender’s Partitioning Scheme Applied to a New Formulation of the Quadratic Assignment Problem,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly (Vol. 27, 1980 ), p. 29.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sahni, S. and T. Gonzalez, “P-Complete Approximation Problems,” Journal of the Association of Computing Machinery (Vol. 23, No. 3, 1976 ), p. 555–565.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liggett, R.S., “The Quadratic Assignment Problem: An Experimental Evaluation of Solution Strategies,” Management Science (Vol. 27, No. 4, April 1981 ), pp. 442–45 8.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Evans, G.W., M.R. Wilhelm, and W. Karwowski, “A Layout Design Heuristic Employing the Theory of Fuzzy Sets,” International Journal of Production Research (Vol. 25, No. 10, 1987 ), pp. 1431–1450.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Seehof, J.M. and W.O. Evans, “Automated Layout Design Program,” The Journal of Industrial Engineering (Vol. 18, No. 12, 1967 ), pp. 690–695.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lee, R.C. and J.M. Moore, “CORELAP — Computerized Relationship Layout Planning,” Journal of Industrial Engineering (Vol. 18, 1967 ), p. 194.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Heragu, S. and A. Kusiak, “Knowledge Based System for Machine Layout (KBML),” 1988 International Industrial Engineering Conference Proceedings,pp. 159–164.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wilhelm, M.R. and G.W. Evans, “The State-of-the-Art in AGV System Analysis and Planning”, Proceeding of the AGVS `87 (October 1987), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gaskins, R.J. and J.M.A. Tanchoco, “Flow Path Design for Automated Guided Vehicle Systems,” International Journal of Production Research (Vol. 25, No. 5, 1987 ), pp. 667–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Usher, J.S., G.W. Evans, and M.R. Wilhelm, “AGV Flow Path Design and Load Transfer Point Location,” 1988 International Industrial Engineering Conference Proceedings,pp. 174–179.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rabeneck, C.W., J.S. Usher, and G.W. Evans, “An Analytical Models for AGVS Design,” 1989 International Industrial Engineering Conference & Societies’ Manufacturing and Productivity Symposium Proceedings,pp. 191–195.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jafari, M.A. and J.G. Shanthikumar, “Determination of Optimal Buffer Storage Capacities and Optimal Allocation in Multistage Automatic Transfer Lines,” IIE Transactions (Vol. 21, No. 2, 1989 ), pp. 130–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bulgak, A.A. and J.L. Sanders, “Integrating a Modified Simulated Annealing Algorithm with the Simulation of a Manufacturing System to Optimize Buffer Sizes in Automatic Assembly Systems,” Proceedings of the 1988 Winter Simulation Conference,pp. 684–690.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kirkpatrick, S., C.D. Gelatt Jr., and M.P. Vecchi, “Optimization by Simulated Annealing,” Science (Vol. 220, 1983 ), pp. 671–680.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chryssolouris, G. and M. Lee, “Use of Neural Networks for the Design of Manufacturing Systems,” Manufacturing Review (Vol. 3, No. 3, Sept. 1990 ), pp. 187–194.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Chryssolouris
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Manufacturing and ProductivityMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations