Abstract
Gender inequality in interaction takes many forms and is maintained by various processes. For example, men and women frequently differ in the amount of competence that is assigned to them and in the emotional reactions they receive when they attempt to occupy leadership positions. Moreover, women who do achieve such positions often have difficulties exerting influence. For instance, they tend to be perceived as aggressive whereas men exhibiting the same behavior are seen as decisive. In addition, there are usually differences in the types of personality characteristics that men and women are expected to exhibit (e.g., women are expected to be more sensitive than men). There are also gender differences in the rules specifying what degree of informality is acceptable in a given situation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berger, J., Fisek, M.H., Norman, R.Z., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation-states approach. New York: Elsevier.
Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S.J., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479–508.
Berger, J., Wagner, D.G., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1985). Introduction—expectation states theory: Review and assessment. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence: How expectations organize behavior (pp. 1–72 ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Berger, J., Wagner, D.G., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1989). Theory growth, social processes, and metatheory. In J.H. Turner (Ed.), Theory building in sociology: Assessing theoretical cumulation (pp. 19–42 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Blalock, H.M., Jr. (1979). Black-white relations in the 1980’s: Toward a long-term policy. New York: Praeger.
Calzavara, L. (1988). Trends and policy in employment opportunities for women. In J. Curtis, E. Grabb, N. Guppy and S. Gilbert (Eds.), Social inequality in Canada: Patterns, problems, policies (pp. 287–300 ). Scarborough, Ont.: Prentice-Hall Canada.
Colwill, N., & Lips, H.M. (1988). Issues in the workplace. In H.M. Lips (Ed.), Sex and gender: An introduction (pp. 292–315 ). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade’s research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, 105–116.
Deaux, K. (1985). Sex and gender. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 49–81. Deschamps, J.C. (1983). Social attribution. In J. Jaspars, F.D. Finchman, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: Conceptual, developmental and social dimensions (pp. 223–240 ). London: Academic Press.
Deutsch, F.M., Zalenski, C.M., & Clark, M.E. (1986). Is there a double standard of aging? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 771–785.
Dornbusch, S.M., & Scott, W.R. (1975). Evaluation and the exercise of authority. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Eichler, M. (1977). The double standard as an indicator of sex-status differentials. Atlantis, 3, 1–21.
Eichler, M. (1980). The double standard: A feminist critique of feminist social science. London: Croom Helm.
Eichler, M. (1988). Nonsexist research methods: A practical guide. Boston: Allen and Unwin.
Epstein, C.F. (1970a). Woman’s place: Options and limits in professional careers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Epstein, C.F. (1970b). Encountering the male establishment: Sex-status limits on women’s careers in the professions. American Journal of Sociology, 75, 965982.
Epstein, C.F. (1973). Bringing women in: Rewards, punishments, and the structure of achievement. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 208, 62–70.
Epstein, C.F. (1975). Tracking and careers: The case of women in American society. In E.L. Zuckerman (Ed.), Women and men: Roles, attitudes and power relationships (pp. 26–34 ). New York: Radcliffe Club.
Epstein, C.F. (1981). Women in law. New York: Basic Books.
Evan, W.M. (Ed.). (1971). Organizational experiments: Laboratory and field research. New York: Harper and Row.
Foddy, M., & Graham, H. (1987). Sex and double standards in the inference of ability. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Vancouver, B.C.
Foddy, M., & Smithson, M. (1989). Fuzzy sets and double standards: Modeling the process of ability inference. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress: New formulations (pp. 73–99 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Foschi, M. (1986). Actors, observers, and performance expectations: A Bayesian model and an experimental study. Advances in Group Processes: A Research Annual, 3, 181–208.
Foschi, M. (1989). Status characteristics, standards, and attributions. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress: New formulations (pp. 58–72 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Foschi, M. (1990). Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association, Vancouver, B.C.
Foschi, M., & Foddy, M. (1988). Standards, performances, and the formation of self-other expectations. In M. Webster, Jr. & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 248–260, 501–503 ). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Foschi, M., & Foschi, R. (1976). Evaluations and expectations: A Bayesian model. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4, 279–293.
Foschi, M., & Foschi, R. (1979). A Bayesian model for performance expectations: Extension and simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 23 2241.
Foschi, M., & Freeman, S. (1991). Inferior performance, standards, and influence in same-sex dyads. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 23, 99113.
Foschi, M., Lai, L., & Sigerson, K. (1991). Double standards in the assessment of male and female job applicants. Paper presented at the West Coast Conference on Small Group Research, San Jose, CA.
Foschi, M., & Plecash, J. (1983). Sex differences in the attribution of success and failure: An expectation-states explanation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association, Vancouver, B.C.
Foschi, M., Warriner, G.K., & Hart, S.D. (1985). Standards, expectations, and interpersonal influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 108–117.
Giele, J.Z. (1988). Gender and sex roles. In N.J. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 291–323 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Goldberg, P. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women? Transaction, 5, 28–30.
Hansen, R.D., & O’Leary, V.E. (1985). Sex-determined attributions. In V.E. O’Leary, R.K. Unger, & B.S. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology (pp. 67–99 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Harvey, J.H., & Weary, G. (1984). Current issues in attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 427–459.
Harvey, O.J. (1953). An experimental approach to the study of status relations in informal groups. American Sociological Review, 18, 357–367.
Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51, 358–374.
Hewstone, M., & Jaspars, J. (1982). Intergroup relations and attribution processes. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 99–133 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Higgins, E.T., Strauman, T. & Klein, R. (1986). Standards and the process of self-evaluation: Multiple affects from multiple stages. In R.M. Sorrentino & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 23–63 ). New York: Guilford Press.
Howard, J.A. (1990). A sociological framework for cognition. Advances in Group Processes: A Research Annual, 7, 75–103.
Humphrey, R. (1985). How work roles influence perception: Structural-cognitive processes and organizational behavior. American Sociological Review, 50, 24 2252.
James, W. (1981). [Originally published in 18901. The principles of psychology, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kanter, R.M. (1977a). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Kanter, R.M. (1977b). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965–990.
Kelley, H.H., & Michela, J.L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457–501.
Latham, G.P., & Yukl, G.A. (1975). A review of research on the application of goal setting in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 824–845.
Lee, T.W., Locke, E.A, & Latham, G.P. (1989). Goal setting theory and job performance. In L.A. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 291–326 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P.S. (1944). Level of aspiration. In J.M. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders (Vol. 1, pp. 333–378 ). New York: Ronald Press.
Lips, H.M. (1988). Sex and gender: An introduction. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Locke, E.A., Shaw, K.N., Saari, L.M., & Latham, G.P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125–152.
Lockheed, M.E. (1985). Sex and social influence: A meta-analysis guided by theory. In J. Berger and M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence: How expectations organize behavior (pp. 406–429 ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lockheed, M.E., & Hall, K.P. (1976). Conceptualizing sex as a status characteristic: Applications to leadership training strategies. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 111–124.
Lott, B. (1985). The devaluation of women’s competence. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 43–60.
Maslin, A., & Davis, J.L. (1975). Sex role stereotyping as a factor in mental health standards among counselors-in-training. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22, 87–91.
McArthur, L.Z. (1985). Social judgment biases in comparable worth analysis. In H.I. Hartmann (Ed.), Comparable worth: New directions for research (pp. 53–70 ). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
McDill, E.L., Natriello, G., & Pallas, A.M. (1986). A population at risk: Potential consequences of tougher school standards for student dropouts. American Journal of Education, 94, 135–181.
Meeker, B.F., & Weitzel-O’Neill, P.A. (1977). Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups. American Sociological Review, 42, 91–105.
Moore, J.C., Jr. (1968). Status and influence in small group interactions. Sociometry, 31, 47–63.
Moore, J.C., Jr. (1969). Social status and social influence: Process considerations. Sociometry, 32, 145–158.
Natriello, G., & Dornbusch, S.M. (1984). Teacher evaluative standards and student effort. New York: Longman.
Natriello, G., & McDill, E.L. (1986). Performance standards, student effort on homework, and academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 59, 18–31.
Nielsen, J.M. (1990). Sex and gender in society: Perspectives on stratification ( 2nd ed. ). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Nieva, V.F., & Gutek, B.A. (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 5, 267–276.
Olson, J.M., & Ross, M. (1985). Attribution research: Past contributions, current trends, and future prospects. In J.H. Harvey & G. Weary (Eds.), Attribution: Basic issues and applications (pp. 281–311 ). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Paludi, M.A., & Strayer, L.A. (1985). What’s in an author’s name? Differential evaluations of performance as a function of author’s name. Sex Roles, 12, 353–361.
Pugh, M.D., & Wahrman, R. (1983). Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? American Journal of Sociology, 88, 746–762.
Ridgeway, C.L. (1982). Status in groups: The importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 47, 76–88.
Ridgeway, C.L. (1988). Gender differences in task groups: A status and legitimacy account. In M. Webster, Jr. & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 188–206, 495–497 ). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Ross, M., & Fletcher, G.J.O. (1985). Attribution and social perception. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 73–122 ) New York: Random House.
Sears, D.O., Freedman, J.L., & Peplau, L.A. (1985). Social psychology ( 5th ed. ). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Sherif, M., White, B.J. & Harvey, O.J. (1955). Status in experimentally produced groups. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 370–379.
Sohn, D. (1982). Sex differences in achievement self-attributions: An effect-size analysis. Sex Roles, 8, 345–357.
Sontag, S. (1972, September 23). The double standard of aging. Saturday Review, 29–38.
Stewart, P. (1988). Women and men in groups: A status characteristics approach to interaction. In M. Webster, Jr. & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 69–85, 484–486 ). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Tudor, W., Tudor, J., & Gove, W.R. (1979). The effect of sex role differences on the social reaction to mental retardation. Social Forces, 57, 871–886.
Wagner, D.G. (1988). Gender inequalities in groups: A situational approach. In M. Webster, Jr. & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 55–68, 480–484 ). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Wagner, D.G., Ford, R.S., & Ford, T.W. (1986). Can gender inequalities be reduced? American Sociological Review, 51, 47–61.
Wallston, B.S., & O’Leary, V.E. (1981). Sex makes a difference: Differential perceptions of women and men. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 9–41 ). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Webster, M., Jr., & Driskell, J.E., Jr. (1978). Status generalization: A review and some new data. American Sociological Review, 43, 220–236.
Webster, M., Jr., & Entwisle, D.R. (1976). Expectation effects on performance evaluations. Social Forces, 55, 493–502.
Webster, M., Jr., & Foschi, M. (1988). Overview of status generalization. In M. Webster, Jr. & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 1–20, 477–478 ). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Whitley, B.E., Jr., McHugh, M.C., & Frieze, I.H. (1986). Assessing the theoretical models for sex differences in causal attributions of success and failure. In J.S. Hyde & M.C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 102–135 ). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wiley, M.G. (1986). How expectation states organize theory construction. Contemporary Sociology, 15, 338–341.
Zander, A., & Cohen, A.R. (1955). Attributed social power and group acceptance: A classroom experimental demonstration. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 490–492.
Zelditch, M., Jr. (1969). Can you really study an army in the laboratory? In A. Etzioni (Ed.), A sociological reader on complex organizations ( 2nd ed., pp. 528–539 ). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Foschi, M. (1992). Gender and Double Standards for Competence. In: Gender, Interaction, and Inequality. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2199-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2199-7_8
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3098-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2199-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive