## Abstract

Mandelbrot is often characterized as the father of fractal geometry. Some people, however, remark that many of the fractals and their descriptions go back to classical mathematics and mathematicians of the past like Georg Cantor (1872), Giuseppe Peano (1890), David Hilbert (1891), Helge von Koch (1904), Waclaw Sierpinski (1916), Gaston Julia (1918), or Felix Hausdorff (1919), to name just a few. Yes, indeed, it is true that the creations of these mathematicians played a key role in Mandelbrot’s concept of a new geometry. But at the same time it is true that they did not think of their creations as conceptual steps towards a new perception or a new geometry of nature. Rather, what we know so well as the Cantor set, the Koch curve, the Peano curve, the Hilbert curve and the Sierpinski gasket, were regarded as exceptional objects, as counter examples, as ‘mathematical monsters’. Maybe this is a bit overemphasized. Indeed, many of the early fractals arose in the attempt to fully explore the mathematical content and limits of fundamental notions (e.g. ‘continuous’ or ‘curve’). The Cantor set, the Sierpinski carpet and the Menger sponge stand out in particular because of their deep roots and essential role in the development of early topology.

## Keywords

Sierpinski Gasket Hilbert Curve Classical Fractal Sierpinski Carpet Koch Curve## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 2.eoonardo of Pisa, also known as Leonardo Fibonacci, helped introduce into mathematics the Hindu-Arabic numerals 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. His best known work, the
*Liber abaci*(1202; `Book of the Abacus’) spends the first seven chapters explaining the place value, by which the position of a figure determines whether it is a unit, ten, hundred, and so forth, and demonstrating the use of the numerals in arithmetical operations.Google Scholar - 3.The metric system is now used internationally by scientists and in most nations. It was brought into being by the French National Assembly between 1791 and 1795. The spread of the system was slow but continuous, and, by the early 1970’s only a few countries, notably the United States, had not adapted the metric system for general use. Since 1960 the definition of a meter has been: 1 meter = 1,650,763.73 wavelenghts of the orange-red line in the spectrum of the krypton-86 atom under specified conditions. In the 1790’s it was defined as 1/10,000,000 of the circumference of the quadrant of the Earth’s circumference running from the North Pole through Paris to the equator.Google Scholar
- 4.G. Cantor,
*Über unendliche, lineare Punktmannigfaltigkeiten V, Mathematische*Annalen 21 (1883) 545–591MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.W. Sierpinski, C. R. Acad. Paris 160 (1915) 302, and W. Sierpinski,
*Sur une courbe cantorienne qui content une image biunivoquet et continue detoute courbe donneé*C. R. Acad. Paris 162 (1916) 629–632.Google Scholar - 8.Lvov, Ukrainian Lviv, Polish Lw6w, German Lemberg, city and administrative center in the Ukrainian SSR. Founded in 1256 Lvov has always been the chief center of Galicia. Lvov was Polish between 1340 and 1772 until the first partition, when it was given to Austria. In 1919 it was restored to Poland and became a world famous university town hosting one of the most influential mathematics schools during the 1920’s and 1930’s. In 1939 it was annexed by the Soviets as a result of the Hider-Stalin Pact, and the previously flourishing polish mathematics school collapsed. Later several of its great scientists were victims of Nazi Germany.Google Scholar
- 10.B. Bondarenko,
*Generalized Triangles and Pyramids of Pascal, Their Fractals, Graphs and Applications*, Tashkent, Fan, 1990, in Russian.Google Scholar - 1.H. von Koch,
*Sur une courbe continue sans tangente, obtenue par une construction géometrique élémentaire*,Arkiv for Matematik 1 (1904) 681–704. Another article is H. von Koch,*Une méthode géométrique élémentaire pour l’étude de certaines questions de la théorie des courbes planes*,Acta Mathematica 30 (1906) 145–174.Google Scholar - 13.G. Peano,
*Sur une courbe, qui remplit toute une aire plane*, Mathematische Annalen 36 (1890) 157–160.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 14.D. Hilbert,
*Über die stetige Abbildung einer Linie auf ein Flächenstück*, Mathematische Annalen 38 (1891) 459–460.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.Luiz Velho, Jonas de Miranda Gomes,
*Digital Halftoning with Space-Filling Curves*, Computer Graphics 25,4 (1991) 81–90.Google Scholar - 19.R. J. Stevens, A. F. Lehar, F. H. Preston,
*Manipulation and Presentation of Multidimensional Image Data Using the Peano Scan*, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 5 (1983) 520–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 22.The notion ‘onto’ means here that for every point
*z*of the unit square there is exactly one point*s*in the unit interval that is mapped to z =*f (x)*.Google Scholar - 23.C. Kuratowski,
*Topologie**11*, PWN, 1961. R. Engelking,*Dimension Theory*, North Holland, 1978.Google Scholar - 25.For more details about dimensions we refer to Gerald E. Edgar,
*Measure, Topology and Fractal Geometry*, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.Google Scholar - 26.W. Sierpinski,
*Sur une courbe cantorienne qui content une image binnivoquet et continue detoute courbe donné*, C. R. Acad. Paris 162 (1916) 629–632.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - 28.K. Menger,
*Allgemeine Räume und charakteristische Räume, Zweite Mitteilung: „Ober umfassenste n-dimensionale Mengen“*, Proc. Acad. Amsterdam 29, (1926) 1125–1128. See also K. Menger,*Dimensionstheorie*, Leipzig 1928.Google Scholar - 37.B. Mandelbrot,
*The Fractal Geometry of Nature*, Freeman, New York, 1982.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - 38.E. E. Kummer,
*Über Ergänzungssätze zu den allgemeinen Reziprozitätsgesetzen*, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 44 (1852) 93–146. S.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wilson was probably the first who gave a rigorous explanation for the Sierpinski gasket appearing in Pascal’s triangle, however, not using Kummer’s result. See S. Wilson,
*Cellular automata can generate fractals*, Discrete Appl. Math. 8 (1984) 91–99.Google Scholar