Energy Policy: Insurance against the Unknown

  • David Bodansky
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Science Research book series (ESRH, volume 45)

Abstract

In considering appropriate responses to the problem of global climate change, I would like to suggest three key points:
  1. (1)

    Prudence calls for making vigorous efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, with the initial burden perforce falling on the industrialized countries. This point is somewhat controversial.

     
  2. (2)

    The reduction of the use of fossil fuels is central to addressing the problem of greenhouse gas emissions. This is not very controversial.

     
  3. (3)

    In implementing future energy policies, it is a mistake to neglect the expansion of nuclear power, along with conservation and solar power. The nuclear issue is so controversial that it sometimes is ignored as being too controversial to address.

     

Keywords

Radioactive Waste Energy Policy Solar Power Soviet Bloc Reactor Safety 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ICRP, Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 26, Annals of the ICRP 1, No. 3 (1977).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gregg Marland and T.A. Boden, CO2 Emissions—modern record/national, in: “Trends ’91: A Compendium of Data on Global Change,” T.A. Boden, R.J. Sepanski, and F.W. Stoss, eds., ORNL/CDIAC-46, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN (1991).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    World Bank. “World Development Report 1991,” Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    CECD/IEA. “Energy Balances of OECD Countries, 1980–1989,” CECD/IEA, Paris (1991).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    National Research Council. “Rethinking High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal: A Position Statement of the Board on Radioactive Waste Management,” National Academy Press, Washington DC (1990), p. vii.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luther J. Carter. “Nuclear Imperatives and the Public Trust: Dealing with Radioactive Waste,” Resources for the Future, Washington DC (1987), p. 431.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    David Bodansky, Global Warming and Clean Electricity, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion33:1489–1507 (1991); Proceedings of the 18th European Physical Society Plasma Physics Division Conference (Berlin, June 1991), D.C. Robinson, ed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    David Bodansky, Implementing the Nuclear Option, in: “Proceedings of the Conference on Global Climate Change and Energy Policy” (Los Alamos National Laboratory, October 1991), Louis Rosen and Robert Glasser, eds., American Institute of Physics, New York, NY (to be published, 1992).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Bodansky
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Department FM-15University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations