Biomaterials pp 223-244 | Cite as

Tissue Response to Implants

  • Joon B. Park
  • Roderic S. Lakes

Abstract

In order to implant a material, the surgeon has to injure the tissue first. Also the injured or diseased tissues should be removed to some extent in the process of implantation. The success of the entire operation depends on the kind and degree of tissue response. This is an important aspect of biocompatibility. Biocompatibility entails mechanical, chemical, pharmacological, and surface compatibility as mentioned in Chapter 1. The tissue response toward injury may vary widely according to the site, species, contamination, etc. However, the inflammation and the cellular response to the wound for both intentional and accidental injuries are the same regardless of the sites.

Keywords

Bone Cement Tissue Reaction Tissue Response Pyrolytic Carbon Injured Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. B. Ames, “Dietary Carcinogens and Anticarcinogens,” Science, 221, 1256–1264, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. C. O. Bechtol, A. B. Ferguson, and P. G. Laing, Metals and Engineering in Bone and Joint Surgery, Balliere, Tindall and Cox, London, 1959.Google Scholar
  3. S. D. Bruck, Blood Compatible Synthetic Polymers: An Introduction, Charles C. Thomas, Publ., Springfield, Ill., 1974.Google Scholar
  4. J. Charnley, Acrylic Cement in Orthopaedic Surgery, Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1970.Google Scholar
  5. D. R. Clarke and J. B. Park, “Prevention of Erythrocyte Adhesion onto Porous Surfaces by Fluid Perfusion,” Biomaterials, 2, 9–13, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. L. L. Hench and E. C. Ethridge, Biomaterials: An Interfacial Approach, Academic Press, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
  7. A. S. Hoffman, “Applications of Radiation Processing in Biomedical Engineering—A Review of the Preparation and Properties of Novel Biomaterials,” Radiat. Phys. Chem., 9, 207–219, 1977.Google Scholar
  8. S. F. Hulbert, S. N. Levine, and D. D. Moyle, Prosthesis and Tissue: The Interfacial Problems, J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974.Google Scholar
  9. S. N. Levine (ed.), “Materials in Biomedical Engineering,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 146, 1968.Google Scholar
  10. H. I. Maiback and D. T. Rovee (eds.), Epidermal Wound Healing, Year Book Medical Pubs., Inc., Chicago, Ill., 1972.Google Scholar
  11. H. A. Milman and E. K. Weisburger, Handbook of Carcinogen Testing, Noyes Pubns., Park Ridge, N.J., 1985.Google Scholar
  12. A. Reif, “The Causes of Cancer,” Am. Sci., 69, 437–447, 1981.Google Scholar
  13. E. W. Salzman, “Nonthrombogenic Surfaces: Critical Review,” Blood, 38, 509–523, 1971.Google Scholar
  14. P. N. Sawyer and S. Srinivasan, “The Role of Electrochemical Surface Properties in Thrombosis at Vascular Interfaces: Cumulative Experience of Studies in Animals and Man,” Bull. N.Y. Acad. Med., 48, 235–256, 1972.Google Scholar
  15. G. K. Smith and J. Black, “Models for Systemic Effects of Metallic Implants,” in Retrieval and Analysis of Orthopaedic Implants, A. Weinstein, E. Horowitz, and A. W. Ruff (eds.), National Bureau of Standards, 1977, pp. 23–28.Google Scholar
  16. M. R. Urist (ed.), Fundamental and Clinical Bone Physiology, J. B. Lippincott Co., New York, 1980.Google Scholar
  17. L. Vroman, Blood, American Museum Science Books, B26, Doubleday & Co., Inc., Garden City, N.Y., 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joon B. Park
    • 1
  • Roderic S. Lakes
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations