Complementary Cognitive and Motor Image Processing

  • Bruce Bridgeman
Part of the Perspectives in Vision Research book series (PIVR)


Everyone shares the irresistible conception that vision is one sense. We experience one coherent visual world and produce visually guided behavior to interact with that world. Extensive laboratory work, however, has shown this introspection to be in error: visual processing has several representations of space, coding different aspects of the information available from vision. The representations operate simultaneously, in parallel, in performing various visual functions.


Target Position Cognitive System Retinal Image Motor Representation Visual Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bridgeman, B., Hendry, D., and Stark, L., 1975, Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements, Vis. Res. 15:719–722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bridgeman, B., Kirch, M., and Sperling, A., 1981, Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion, Percept. Psychophys. 29:336–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bridgeman, B., and Klassen, H., 1983, On the origin of stroboscopc induced motion, Percept. Psychophys. 34:149–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., and Nagle, M., 1979, Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 5:692–700.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bridgeman, B., and Stark, L., 1979, Omnidorectional increase in threshold for image shifts during saccadic eye movements, Percept. Psychophys. 25:241–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bridgeman, B., and Stark, L., 1981, Efferent copy and visual direction, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. Suppl. 20:55.Google Scholar
  7. Brune, F., and Lucking, C. H., 1969, Oculomotorik, Bewegungswahrnehmung und Raumkonstanz der Sehdinge, Nervenarzt 40:692–700.Google Scholar
  8. Ditchburn, R., 1955, Eye-movements in relation to retinal action, Optica Acta 1:171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Festinger, L., and Canon, L. K., 1965, Information about spatial location based on knowledge about efference, Psychol. Rev. 72:373–384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hallett, P. E., and Lightstone, A. D., 1976, Saccadic eye movements towards stimuli triggered during prior saccades, Vis. Res. 16:99–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mack, A., 1970, An investigation of the relationship between eye and retinal image movement in the perception of movement, Percept. Psychophys. 8:291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mateeff, S., and Gourevich, A., 1983, Peripheral vision and perceived visual direction, Biol. Cybernet. 49:111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L., and Macko, K., 1983, Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways, Trends Neurosci. 6:414–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Post, R. B., 1986, Induced motion considered as a visually induced oculogyral illusion, Perception 15:131–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Post, R. B., and Heckman, T., 1986, Induced motion and apparent straight ahead during prolonged stimulation, Percept. Psychophys. 40:263–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Post, R. B., and Leibowitz, H., 1982, The effect of convergence on the vestibulo-ocular reflex and implications for perceived movement, Vis. Res. 22:461–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Post, R. B., and Leibowitz, H., 1985, A revised analysis of the role of efference in motion perception, Perception 14:631–643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roediger, H., Weldon, M., and Challis, B., 1988, Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account, in: Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honor of Endel Tulving (H. L. Roediger and F. I. Craik, eds.), 3–41, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  19. Roelofs, C., 1935, Optische Localization, Arch. Augenheilkd. 109:395–415.Google Scholar
  20. Schneider, G. E., 1967, Contrasting visuomotor functions of tectum and cortex in golden hamster, Psychol. Forsch. 31:52–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stark, L., and Bridgeman, B., 1983, Role of corollary discharge in space constancy, Percept. Psychophys. 34:371–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Trevarthen, C. B., 1968, Two mechanisms of vision in primates, Psychol. Forsch. 31:299–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Essen, D. C., Newsome, W. T., and Bixby, J. L., 1982, The pattern of interhemispheric connections and its relationship to extrastriate visual areas in the macaque monkey, J. Neurosci. 2:265–283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wallach, H., and Lewis, C., 1965, The effect of abnormal displacement of the retinal image during eye movements, Percept. Psychophys. 1:25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wong, E., and Mack, A., 1981, Saccadic programming and perceived location, Acta Psychol. 48:123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce Bridgeman
    • 1
  1. 1.Program in Experimental PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations