Principles of Early Abortion Specimen Examination
For accurate pathologic evaluation of the early aborted conceptus, all aborted tissues and a thorough obstetrical, medical, and family history are required. The need for complete clinical information is similar to that required for other types of intrauterine death. Menstrual dates are valuable for dating the gestational sac and embryo. Information about drug ingestion (e.g., anticonvulsive medication) or exposure to infection during pregnancy (e.g., rubella) is essential for directing the pathologist’s attention to a specific problem and for proper handling of the specimen. A history of previous reproductive failures or a family history of a particular congenital, morphological, or metabolic defect may significantly influence the investigative approach. An example of a consultation request form is given in Appendix II (Table II-7).
KeywordsHuman Embryo Chorionic Villus Abnormal Embryo Embryonic Death Open Neural Tube Defect
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Kalousek DK: Anatomic and chromosome anomalies in specimens of early spontaneous abortion. Seven year experience, in Gilbert EF, Opitz JM (eds): Genetic Aspects of Developmental Pathology, New York: Alan R. Liss Inc., for the National Foundation—March of Dimes BD: OAS JXXIII (1), 1987, pp 153–168.Google Scholar
- Mall FP: On stages in the development of human embryos from 2 to 25 mm long. Anat Anz 46: 78–84, 1914.Google Scholar
- Mall FP, Meyer AW: Studies on abortuses: A survey of pathologic ova in the Carnegie embryological collection. Embryol Carnegie Inst 12: 1–364, 1921.Google Scholar
- O’Rahilly R, Muller F: Developmental Stages of Human Embryos, Washington, DC, Carnegie Institution, Publication 637, 1987.Google Scholar
- Poland BJ, Miller JR, Harris M, Livingston J: Spontaneous abortion: A study of 1961 women and their conceptuses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand (suppl 102 ): 5–32, 1981.Google Scholar
- Streeter GL: Focal deficiencies in fetal tissues and their relation to intra-uterine amputation. Contr Embryol Carnegie Inst 22: 1–44, 1930.Google Scholar