Influence of Shock Wave Number on Canine Renal Morphology Following Treatment with Piezoelectric Lithotripsy Using the Wolf Piezolith 2200

  • D. Neisius
  • G. Seitz
  • T. Gebhardt
  • M. Ziegler


Seventeen kidneys of beagle dogs received 2,000, 3,000, or 4,000 shock waves with the Wolf Piezolith 2200. Stone material had not been previously implanted in the kidneys. Computed tomography (CT) findings within the first 24 hours after treatment showed wedge-shaped enhancements of contrast medium in the shock wave channels (paths of shock waves through the kidneys). Later CT examinations showed no pathological alterations in the same areas. Histological examinations one day after treatment showed alterations in the kidneys, the degree of alteration depending on the number of shock waves administered. At this examination intrarenal hematomas and papillary necrosis were seen, but perirenal or subcapsular hematomas were not. Damage to vessels was found in small and mid-sized veins and arteries. Seven and 14 weeks after treatment the extent of residual damage was small in comparison to early renal damage. Two patterns of lesions were observed: a cord-like scar at the corticomedullary junction and a wedge-shaped defect of the papillary apex. In none of the kidneys examined histologically could changes in veins or arteries be detected at seven and 14 weeks after treatment.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Riedlinger R, Ueberle F, Wurster H, et al: Die Zertruemmerung von Nierensteinen durch piezoelektrisch erzeugte Hochenergie-Schallimpulse-Physikalische Grundlagen und experimentelle Untersuchungen. Urologe A 25: 188, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brendel W: Stosswellen-Lithotripsie in Niere und Gallenblase in Verh. Ber. Dtsch. Ges., Innere Medizin 92: 168, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Delius M, Enders G, Xuan Z, et al: Biological effects of shock waves: kidney damage by shock waves in dogs—dose dependence (private communication).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jaeger P, Redha F, Uhlschmid G, et al: Morphological changes in canine kidneys following extracorporeal shock wave treatment. Urol Res 16: 161, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Muschter R, Schmeller NT, Reimers I, et al: ESWL-induced renal damage: an experimental study. In Jacoby GH, et al. (eds): Investigative Urology 2. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaude JV, Williams CM, Millner MR, et al: Renal morphology and function immediately after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. AJR 145: 305, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lingeman JE, McAteer JA, Kempson SA, et al: Bioeffects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Endourol 1: 89, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rubin JI, Arger PH, Pollack HM, et al: Kidney changes after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: CT evaluation. Radiol 162: 21, 1987.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chaussy C, Schmiedt E: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for kidney stones: an alternative to surgery? Urol Radiol 6: 80, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jocham D and Schmiedt E: Extrakorporale Stosswellenlithotripsie von Nieren-und Harnleitersteinen. Dtsch Med Wschr 112: 85, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Newman RC, Hacke HR, Senior D, et al: Pathologic effects of ESWL on canine renal tissue. Urology 29: 194, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Neisius
    • 1
  • G. Seitz
    • 2
  • T. Gebhardt
    • 1
  • M. Ziegler
    • 1
  1. 1.Urological ClinicUniversity of the SaarlandHomburg/SaarWest Germany
  2. 2.Institute of PathologyUniversity of the SaarlandHomburg/SaarWest Germany

Personalised recommendations