Abstract
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL†) with the Dormer lithotripter1 and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PCNL)Z2,3 have revolutionized the management of upper urinary tract calculi. Both techniques may be applied to a wide variety of upper urinary tract calculi, though their relative roles remain yet to be established. In essence, the primary question when using ESWL or PCNL is not who can be treated, but rather who should be treated with these exciting new techniques. Because of the tremendous spectrum of disease presented by symptomatic upper urinary tract calculi requiring intervention, overall statements about the relative benefits of ESWL and PCNL are meaningless; rather, an intelligent decision regarding the indications for these techniques requires that the efficacy, morbidity, and costs associated with ESWL and PCNL for each type of stone problem be established. This presentation will present the treatment approach at the Methodist Hospital of Indiana (MHI), based on careful documentation of patients with upper urinary tract calculi treated with a variety of techniques.
This presentation was part of a planned debate on the following topic: Resolved: Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy alone or in combination with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy provides the preferred approach to large renal calculi and staghorn stones.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chaussy C: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Technical Concept, Experimental Research, and Clinical Application. Basel: S. Karger AG, 1986.
Fernstrom I and Johansson B: Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10: 357, 1976.
Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, et al: Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1,000 cases. J Urol 134: 1077, 1985.
Lingeman JE, Coury TA, Newman DM, et al: Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 138:485, 1987.
Griffith DP: Infection induced stones. In Coe FL (ed), Nephrolithiasis, Pathogenesis, and Treatment. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc., Chapter 10, p. 203., 1978.
Patterson DE, Segura JW, LeRoy AJ: Long-term follow-up of patients treated by percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy for struvite staghorn calculi. J. Endourol 1:177, 1987.
Winfield H, Clayman RV, Chaussy CG: Treatment comparison between percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of staghorn calculi. J Urol 137: 895, 1988.
Kahnoski RJ, Lingeman JE, Coury TA, et al: Combined percutaneous and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for staghorn calculi: an alternative to anatrophic nephrolithotomy. J Urol 135: 679, 1986.
Badlani G, Eshghi M, Smith AD: Percutaneous surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (endopyelotomy): technique and early results. J Urol 135: 26, 1986.
Wilbert DM, Jenny E, Stoeckle M, et al: Calyceal diverticular stones: is ESWL worthwhile? J Urol 135: 183A, 1986.
Psihramis KE and Dretler SP: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of calyceal diverticula calculi. J Urol 138: 707, 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lingeman, J.E. (1989). Relative Roles of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrostolithotomy. In: Lingeman, J.E., Newman, D.M. (eds) Shock Wave Lithotripsy 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2052-5_56
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2052-5_56
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-2054-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2052-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive