Automation in Apheresis

  • D. W. Schoendorfer
Part of the Developments in Hematology and Immunology book series (DIHI, volume 22)


The concept of apheresis has existed now for over 40 years. In the beginning, the means to carry out apheresis was quite impractical and, therefore, the concept did not evolve quickly. One major limitation was that the separation chambers used for apheresis were very expensive to purchase and complicated to sterilize for reuse. In the 1960’s, the science evolved for molding complex parts with relatively inexpensive plastic materials. This science applied to apheresis allowed manufacturers to greatly diminish the cost of the separator and eventually make it low enough to be a true disposable. Thus, apheresis became practiced by a much larger group of investigators and because of this, applications grew.


Plasma Flow Blood Flow Rate Separation Zone Slug Flow Transmembrane Pressure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Rock GA, McCombie N, Tittley P. A new technique for the collection of plasma: machine plasmapheresis. Transfusion 1981; 21: 241 - 6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nydegger UE, Pflugshaupt R. Quality control of blood plasma harvested by the flat-sheet filter system Autopheresis-C. Plasma Ther Transfus Technol 1986; 7: 57 - 9.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Solomon BA, Castino F, Lysaght MJ, Colton CK, Friendman LI. Continuous flow membrane filtration of plasma from whole blood. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1978; XXIV: 21 - 6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zydney AL, Colton CK. Continuous flow membrane plasmapheresis: theoretical models for flux and hemolysis prediction. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1982; XXVIII: 408 - 12.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taylor GI. Distribution of velocity and temperature between concentric rotating cylinders. Proceedings of the Royal Society (A) 1935; 151: 494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Forstrom RJ, Bartelt K, Blackshear PL Jr, Wood T. Formed element deposition onto filtering walls. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1975; XXI: 602 - 7.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schoendorfer DW, Hansen LE, Kenney DM. The surge technique: a method to increase purity of platelet concentrates obtained by centrifugal apheresis. Transfusion 1983; 23: 182 - 9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buchholz DH, Porten JH, Menitove JE et al. Description and use of the CS-3000 blood cell separator for single-donor platelet collection. Transfusion 1983; 23: 190 - 6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hester J, Kellogg R, McCredie K, Freireich E. Platelet response to dual stage platelet concentrates. Transfusion 1980; 20: 625.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. W. Schoendorfer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations