Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Large Common Bile Duct Stones

  • Frederick C. JohlinJr.
  • Stefan A. Loening
  • James Maher
  • Joseph Karacic


Retained stones in the common bile duct remain a clinical problem in 2% to 5% of patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Extraction through a T-tube or via an endoscopic papillotomy is successful in 85% to 95% of patients. There remains, however, a sizable group of patients who require reoperation with its attendant risk of morbidity and mortality. A recent study by Paumgartner et al. suggests that ESWL may be useful for fragmenting large common bile duct stones. A study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of ESWL in fragmenting common bile duct stones that were too large to be extracted via a T-tube or endoscopic papillotomy.

Three patients were entered into the study. Age ranged from 62 to 92 years. All patients had either severe, preexisting systemic disease, or were of an advanced age and had failed attempts at extraction via the T-tube or by endoscopie papillotomy. Patients were treated with 2,400 to 3,300 shock waves at 20 kV.

Stones were successfully fragmented in all patients. All patients were free of common bile duct stones at 30 days by repeat endoscopie retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). ESWL seems to be an effective adjuvant treatment in clearing the common bile duct of stones that would otherwise require additional surgery.


Shock Wave Bile Duct Common Bile Duct Shock Wave Lithotripsy Common Bile Duct Stone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Broughan TA, Sivak MV, Hermann, RE: The management of retained and recurrent bile duct stones. Surgery 98: 746, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Safrany L: Transduodenal endoscopic sphincterotomy and extraction of bile duct stone. World JSurg 2: 457, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Safrany L and Cotton PB: Endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis. Surg Clin N Am 62: 825, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Startiz M, Ewe K, Meyer-sum-Buschenfelde KH: Mechanical gallstone lithotripsy in the common bile duct in vitro and in vivo experience. Endoscopy 15: 316, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sievert CE and Silvis SE: Evaluation of electrohydraulic lithotripsy as a means of gallstone fragmentation in a canine model. Gastrointest Endosc 33: 233, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lear JL, Ring EA, Macoviak JA, et al: Percutaneous transhepatic electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Radiol 150: 589, 1984.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanaka M, Yoshimoto H, Ikeda S, et al: Two approaches for electrohydraulic lithotripsy in the common bile duct. Surgery 98: 313, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lux G, Ell C, Hochberger J, et al: The first successful endoscopie retrograde laser lithotripsy of common bile duct stones in man using a pulsed neodymium-YAG laser. Endoscopy 18: 144, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang QL, Fujita R, Satake Y: Laser-beam lithotripsy for bile duct stone via percutaneous-transhepatic cholangioscopy. Chin Med J 98: 638, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Demling L, Ermert H, Reimann JF, et al: Lithotripsy in the common bile duct using ultrasound: preliminary in vitro experiments. Endoscopy 16: 226, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pitt HA, McFadden DW, Gadacz TR: Agents for gallstone dissolution. Am J Surg 1953: 233, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sauerbruch T, Delius M, Paumgartner G, et al: Fragmentation of gallstones by extracorporeal shock waves. NEJM 314: 818, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sauerbruch T, Holl J, Sackmann M, et al: Treatment of bile duct stones by extracorporeal shock waves. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT, and MR 8: 155, 1987.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sackmann M, Weber, W, Delius M, et al: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of gallstones without general anesthesia: first clinical experience. Ann Intern Med 1070: 347, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL: ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49: 239, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Madden JL: Primary common bile duct stones. World J Surg 2: 465, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Newbrand M, Sauerbruch T, Stellaard F, et al: In vitro cholesterol gallstone dissolution after fragmentation with shock waves. Digestion 34: 51, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederick C. JohlinJr.
    • 1
  • Stefan A. Loening
    • 1
  • James Maher
    • 1
  • Joseph Karacic
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Medicine, Urology, and SurgeryUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics and Veterans Administration Medical CenterIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations