Skip to main content

Outcome of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Multiple Renal Calculi Based on Stone Burden and Location

  • Chapter
Shock Wave Lithotripsy

Abstract

Of 2,234 renal units treated with the Dornier HM3 lithotripter, 641 contained multiple renal calculi. The number of treatments/kidney ratio varied from 1.0 to 1.58 (mean = 1.47) and was dependent on stone burden and location.

Radiological follow-up on 525 renal units (81%) after 3 to 42 months (mean = 7.5 months) showed 54.1 % were stone free, 21.5% had residual stone fragments (≤ 4 mm), and 24.4% had residual fragments > 4 mm. A significant difference in stone-free efficacy was demonstrated between stones ≤ 15 mm and > 15 mm (p < 0.001 ) and < 30 mm and ≥30 mm (p < 0.001). Patients with multiple renal calculi < 15 mm became stone free in 72% of cases compared to 40% of cases with a stone burden ≥ 30 mm.

Stone-free efficacy was also influenced by stone site but did not reach statistical significance. Complications occurred in 49 renal units (9.3%) and was unrelated to stone burden. New stone formation occurred in 18 cases (3.4%). The presence of multiple renal calculi had an adverse effect on stone-free outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chaussy C, Brendel W, Schmiedt E: Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. The Lancet 2: 1265, 1980.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sofras F, Karayannis A, Kostakopoulos A, et al: Methodology, results and complications in 2,000 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy procedures. Br J Urol 61: 9, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lingeman JE, Newman DM, Mertz JHO, et al: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the Methodist Hospital of Indiana experience. J Urol 135: 1134, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Palfrey ELH, Bultitude MI, Challah S, et al: Report of the first 1,000 patients treated at St. Thomas Hospital by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Br J Urol 58: 573, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaussy C and Schmiedt E: Shock wave treatment for stones in the upper urinary tract. Urol Clin N Am 10: 743, 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Drach GW, Dretler SP, Fair WR, et al: Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 135: 1127, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Politis G and Griffith DP: ESWL: stone-free efficacy based upon stone size and location. World J Urol 5: 255, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffith DP and Valiquette L: PICA/Burden: a staging system for upper tract urinary stones. J Urol 138: 253, 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Saunders JE, Earle DJ, Porter JC, et al: Radiation dose to patients from extracprporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Br Med J 292: 958, 1986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin PJP and Hrejsa AF: Patient exposure and radiation environment of an extracorporeal shock wave lithotripter system. J Urol 138: 712, 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Coptcoat MJ, Webb DR, Kellett MJ, et al: The complications of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: management and prevention. Br J Urol 58: 578, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lingeman JE, Coury TA, Newman DM, et al: Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 138: 485, 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dickinson IK, Fletcher MS, Bailey MJ, et al: Combination of percutaneous surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of large renal calculi. Br J Urol 58: 581, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lingeman JE, Saywell RM, Woods JR, et al: Cost analysis of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy relative to other surgical and nonsurgical treatment alternatives for urolithiasis. Medical Care 24: 1151, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gleeson, M.J., Shabsigh, R., Griffith, D.P. (1988). Outcome of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Multiple Renal Calculi Based on Stone Burden and Location. In: Lingeman, J.E., Newman, D.M. (eds) Shock Wave Lithotripsy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1977-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1977-2_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1979-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1977-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics