Skip to main content

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and ESWL versus Ureteral Stent and ESWL for the Treatment of Large Renal Calculi and Staghorn Calculi: Preliminary Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study

  • Chapter

Abstract

Recently published data indicate that morbidity after ESWL of large renal calculi (> 2 cm) can be significantly diminished by inserting a ureteral double-J stent prior to treatment. A prospective, randomized study was designed to clarify if ESWL plus ureteral stenting is preferable to the combination of PNL/ESWL for the treatment of large renal calculi (> 2.5 cm) and staghorn stones. To date 74 patients have entered the study; preliminary data of 53 patients are available.

Table 1

Complications (bleeding, septicemia, deterioration of renal function) are significantly more frequent following PNL/ESWL, whereas the need for auxiliary measures (mainly percutaneous nephrostomies) is greater following stent/ESWL. Results after an average follow-up of three months indicate that only 15% of patients treated with ESWL and ureteral stenting were free of stones, suggesting that longer follow-up is necessary for the assessment of the definitive value of this treatment modality in the treatment of large renal calculi. With the availability of anesthesia-free ESWL in the Dornier HM3, this topic is currently of particular interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abomelha MS, Said MT, Otaibi KE, et al: ESWL monotherapy in staghorn calculi. V World Congress on Endourology and ESWL. Cairo, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alken P, Scharfe T, Rorig J, et al: Staghorn stones: surgery or ESWL and PNL? V World Congress on Endourology and ESWL. Cairo, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chaussy CG, Schmiedt E, Jocham D, et al: First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 127: 417, 1982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Drach GW, Dretler SP, Fair WR, et al: Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 135: 1127, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenberger F, Rassweiler J, Bub P, et al: Differentiated approach to staghorn calculi using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: an analysis of 151 consecutive cases. World J Urol 5: 248, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fuchs G, Miller K, Rassweiler J, et al: One-year experience with Dornier lithotripter. Eur Urol 11: 145, 1985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Graff J, Pastor J, Herberhold D, et al: Technical modifications of the Dornier HM3 lithotripter with an improved anesthesia technique. World J Urol 5: 202, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Groenveld AE: ESWL monotherapy in large stone burdens. V World Congress on Endourology and ESWL. Cairo, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Libby J, Meacham RB, Griffith DG: Role of silicone ureteral stents in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of large renal calculi. J Urol 139: 15, 1988.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lingeman JE: Current concepts on the relative efficacy of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. World J Urol 5: 229, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller K, Bachor R, Hautmann R: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy/ESWL versus ureteral stent/ESWL for the treatment of large renal calculi and staghorn stones: a prospective randomized study. V World Congress on Endourology and ESWL. Cairo, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Patterson DE, Segura JW, LeRoy AJ: Long-term follow-up of patients treated by percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy for struvite staghorn calculi. J Endourol 1: 177, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Snyder JA, Rosenblum JL, Smith AD: Endourological removal of staghorn calculi in the elderly: analysis of 42 cases. J Endourol 1: 123, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tiselius HG, Hellgren E, Wall I: Infectious staghorn stones treated with ESWL and hemiacidrin irrigation. J Endourol 2: 137, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zwergel U, Neisius D, Zwergel T, et al: Results and clinical management of extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy (EPL) in 1,321 consecutive treatments. World J Urol 5: 213, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, K., Bachor, R., Hautmann, R. (1988). Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and ESWL versus Ureteral Stent and ESWL for the Treatment of Large Renal Calculi and Staghorn Calculi: Preliminary Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study. In: Lingeman, J.E., Newman, D.M. (eds) Shock Wave Lithotripsy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1977-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1977-2_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1979-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1977-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics