Why Did the Industrial Revolution Occur in England?

  • Gordon Tullock
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy book series (TREP, volume 1)


Like most economists, I am a great admirer of Adam Smith and feel, again like most economists, that the application of his ideas had much to do with the efflorescence of British civilization in the 19th century. The industrial revolution, however, got its basic start, and indeed according to some historians was completely accomplished, before The Wealth of Nations had significant influence on government policy. The Savery steam engine was built in England in 1698, the Newcomen in 1721, and by 1763 Watt had created the modern steam engine. Hargreaves’ spinning jenny was invented in 1765 and Arkwright’s water frame in 1769. Crompton introduced his “mule” in 1774. The Wealth of Nations, of course, was published in 1776, but it is hard to argue that the introduction of the power loom by Cartwright, in 1785, was the result of policies based on Adam Smith’s work. In fact, Smith had little or no effect on English governmental policies before 1815.


Industrial Revolution Land Rent Jury Trial Monopoly Rent Special Privilege 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    See almost any one of the books of Sir Phillip Namier on 18th century English politics.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nelson was captain at 21. In his case, he no doubt deserved it. His rapid promotion, however, depended not on his merits but on the fact that he had a close relative in the Admiralty.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The Boston Tea Party is a particularly good example of a democracy getting hopelessly muddled. Although a number of New England merchants who had expensive smuggled tea in their warehouses were about to lose money, the average American would clearly benefit from the much lower prices on tea.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.B. Ekelund, Jr., and Robert D. Tollison, “Economic Regulation in Mercantile England: Heckscher Revisited,” Economic Inquiry, forthcoming, 1980 and “A Rent-Seeking Theory of French Mercantilism,” unpublished manuscript, 1980.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Her killing of Mary, Queen of Scots, was a continuation of the policy founded by her grandfather of killing all the people that had any, even remote claim to the throne of England.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ekelund and Tollison.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ekelund and Tollison.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Once again exempting Chancery.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Subject to a 95% mortage.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    The Logic of the Law. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1971 and Trials on Trial: The Pure Theory of Legal Procedures, New York: Columbia University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordon Tullock

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations