The Potential Field Approach And Operational Space Formulation In Robot Control

  • Oussama Khatib


The paper presents a radically new approach to real-time dynamic control and active force control of manipulators. In this approach the manipulator control problem is reformulated in terms of direct control of manipulator motion in operational space, the space in which the task is originally described, rather than controlling the task’s corresponding joint space motion obtained after geometric and kinematic transformation. The control method is based on the construction of the manipulator end effector dynamic model in operational space. Also, the paper presents a unique real-time obstacle avoidance method for manipulators and mobile robots based on the “artificial potential field” concept. In this method, collision avoidance, traditionally considered a high level planning problem, can be effectively distributed between different levels of control, allowing real-time robot operations in a complex environment. Using a time-varying artificial potential field, this technique has been extended to moving obstacles. A two-level control architecture has been designed to increase the system real-time performance. These methods have been implemented in the COSMOS system for a PUMA 560 robot arm. We have demonstrated compliance, contact, sliding, and insertion operations using wrist and finger sensing, as well as real-time collision avoidance with moving obstacles using visual sensing.


Mobile Robot Collision Avoidance Obstacle Avoidance Artificial Potential Field Active Force Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    H.P. Moravec, “Obstacle Avoidance and Navigation in the Real World by a Seeing Robot Rover,” Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    T. Lozano-Perez, “Spatial Planning: A Configuration Space Approach,” AI Memo 605, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, 1980.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. Chatila, Système de Navigation pour un Robot Mobile Autonome: Modélisation et Processus Décisionnels,“ Thése de Docteur-Ingénieur, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France, 1981.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Brooks, “Solving the Find-Path Problem by Good Representation of Free Space,” IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-13, pp. 190–197, 1983.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. Brooks, “Aspects of Mobile Robot Visual Map Making,” Second International Symposium of Robotics Research, Kyoto, Japan, Aug. 20–23, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    O. Khatib and J.F. Le Maitre, “Dynamic Control of Manipulators Operating in a Complex Environment,” Proceedings Third CISM-IFToMM Symposium on Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators, Udine, Italy, 1978, pp. 267–282, (Elsevier 1979 ).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    O. Khatib, “Commande Dynamique dans l’Espace Opérationnel des Robots Manipulateurs en Présence d’Obstacles,” Thése de Docteur-Ingénieur, École Nationale Supérieure de l’Aéronautique et de l’Espace (ENSAE), Toulouse, France, 1980.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    O. Khatib, “Dynamic Control of Manipulators in Operational Space,” Sixth CISMIFToMM Congress on Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, New Delhi, India, December 15–20, 1983, pp. 1128–1131.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    O. Khatib, “The Operational Space Formulation in Robot Manipulators Control,” 15th International Symposium on Industrial Robots, Tokyo, Japan, Sept. 11–13, 1985.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    D.E. Whitney, “Force Feedback Control of Manipulator Fine Motions,” ASME, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, pp. 91–97, June 1977.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    R.P. Paul and B. Shimano, “Compliance and Control,” Proceedings of the Joint Automatic Control Conference, Purdue University, July 1976, pp. 694–699.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    J.K. Salisbury, “Active Stiffness Control of a Manipulator in Cartesian Coordinates,” 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Albuquerque, New Mexico, December 1980.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    J.J. Craig and M. Raibert, “A Systematic Method for Hybrid Position/Force Control of a Manipulator,” Proceedings 1979 IEEE Computer Software Applications Albuquerque Conference, Chicago, 1979.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    O. Khatib, M. Llibre and R. Mampey, “Fonction Decision-Commande d’un Robot Manipulateur,” Rapport No. 2/7156, DERA/CERT, Toulouse, France, 1978.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    O. Khatib and J. Burdick, “Dynamic Optimization in Manipulator Design: The Operational Space Formulation,” The 1985 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Miami, November 1985.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    O. Khatib, “Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots,” 1985 International Conference on Robotics and Automation, St. Louis, March 25–28, 1985.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    H.B. Kuntze and W. Schill, “Methods for Collision Avoidance in Computer Controlled Industrial Robots,” 12th ISIR, Paris, June 9–11, 1982.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    N. Hogan, “Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation,” 1984 American Control Conference, San Diego, June 6–8, 1984.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    B. Krogh, “A Generalized Potential Field Approach to Obstacle Avoidance Control. Robotics Research: The Next Five Years and Beyond,” SME Conference Proceedings, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, August 1984.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    C. Buckley, “The Application of Continuum Methods to Path Planning,” Ph.D. Thesis (in progress), Stanford University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 1985.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    O. Khatib, et al., “Robotics in Three Acts,” (Film), Stanford University, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, June 1984.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    O. Khatib, J. Burdick and B. Armstrong, “Robotics in Three Acts - Part II,” (Film), Stanford University, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oussama Khatib
    • 1
  1. 1.Artificial Intelligence LaboratoryStanford UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations