Issues in Control Design for Large Space Structures

  • Robert L. Kosut
  • Michael G. Lyons


The development of a design methodology for the control of Large Space Structures (LSS) involves many different issues. In this paper we present a selective discussion of the theoretical and practical issues that seem most relevant. The discussions cover various types of control design procedures, including both robust (non-adaptive) as well as adaptive, with an emphasis on their practical use.


Model Error Adaptive Control Close Loop System Control Design Stability Margin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Active Control of Space Structures (ACOSS),“ Phase lA final report, Prepared by LMSC for Darpa under contract F30602–80-C-0087, Aug. 1981.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J.N. Aubrun, et al., “Stability Augmentation for Flexible Space Structures,” Proceedings of the IEEE CDC, Hollywood, Fl., Dec. 1979.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J.C. Doyle and G. Stein, “Multivariable Feedback Design: Concepts for a Modern/Classical Synthesis,” IEEE Trans. on Autom. Control, vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 4–17, Feb. 1981.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    R.L. Kosut, H. Salzwedal, and A. Emami, “Robust Control of Flexible Spacecraft,” AIAA J. of Guidance and Control, vol. 6, No. 2, Mar-April 1983.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    B.C. Moore, “Principal component Analysis in Linear Systems: Controllability, Observability, and Model Reduction,” IEEE Trans. on Autom. Control, AC-26, Feb. 1981.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    C.Z. Gregory, Jr., “Reduction of Large Flexible Spacecraft Models Using Internal Balancing Theory,” AIAA J. of Guidance and Control, vol. 7, No. 6, Nov-Dec. 1984.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    N.K. Gupta, “Frequency Shaped Cost Functionals: Extensions of LQG Methods,” AIAA J. of Guidance and Control, pp. 529–535, Nov-Dec. 1980.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    C.A. Desoer, R.W. Liu, J. Murray and R. Saeks, “Feedback System Design: The Fractional Representation Approach to Analysis and Synthesis,” IEEE Trans. on Autom. Control, vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 399–412, June 1980.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    G. Zames, “Feedback and Optimal Sensitivity: Model Reference Transformation, Multiplicative Seminorms, and Approximate Inverses,” IEEE Trans. on Autom. Control, vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 301–310, April 1981.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J.C. Doyle, “Structured Uncertainty in Control Design,” IFAC Workshop on Model Error Compensation, Boston, Ma., June 1985.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    R.L. Kosut and M.G. Lyons, “Adaptive Techniques for Control of Large Space Structures,” ISI Report 50 for AFOSR, under contracts F49620–83-C-0107, F49620–84-C0054.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    R.L. Kosut and C.R. Johnson, Jr., “An Input-Output View of Robustness in Adaptive Control,” Automatica, vol. 20, No. 5, Oct. 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Kosut
    • 1
  • Michael G. Lyons
    • 1
  1. 1.Integrated Systems IncPalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations