Start-up and Operation Scenarios of NET

  • Folker Engelmann
Part of the Ettore Majorana International Science Series book series (EMISS)

Abstract

The Next European Torus (NET), to follow JET after the completion of its mission on the way to developing a fusion reactor, is conceived as an experimental fusion reactor with both physics and technological objectives.

Keywords

International Atomic Energy Agency INTOR Group Lower Hybrid Plasma Resistivity Loop Voltage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. Salpietro, Technological Implications of Start-Up and Current Transients on the Design of Electromagnetical Components, in these ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    INTOR, Phase Two A, Part II, European Contributions, Report EUR FU BRU/XII - 133/85/EDV 10, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 1985, Chapter XIIGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Borrass, SUPERCOIL: A Model for Computational Design of Tokamaks; to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Coccorese, Plasma Position Control, in these ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Vieider, W. Daenner and B. Haferkamp, Design Concepts for NET First Wall and Blankets, Proc. 13 th Symp. on Fusion Technology, Varese, 1984, Vol. 2, p. 1363Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    See, e.g., G. Briffod, Report on the Panel on RF Current Drive, in. these ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    INTOR Group, RF Heating and Current Drive, in “International Tokamak Reactor, Phase Two A, Part II”, Chapter IV, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1985Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. Fujisawa and FER Design Group, Operation Scenario of Fusion Experimental Reactor with Main Emphasis on Startup, in these ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    INTOR Group, “International Tokamak Reactor, Zero Phase”, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1980, STI/PUB/556Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    INTOR Group, “International Tokamak Reactor, Phase One”, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1982, STI/PUB/619Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    INTOR Group, “International Tokamak Reactor, Phase Two A, Part I”, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1983, STI/PUB/638Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    INTOR Group, “International Tokamak Reactor, Phase Two A, Part II”, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1985Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Sheffield, Tokamak Start-Up - Problems and Scenarios to the Transient Phases of Ignited Tokamak Operations, in these ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    F.C. Jobes, S. Bernabei, T.K. Chu, N.J. Fisch, W.M. Hooke, C.F.F. Karney, E.B. Meservey, R.W. Motley, J.E. Stevens and S. von Goeler, Start-Up and Ramp-Up of the PLT Tokamak by Lower Hybrid Waves, in these ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.F.A. Harrison, Impurity Control and Its Impact upon Start-Up and Transformer Recharging in NET, in these ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Borrass and A. Nocentini, Current Drive by High Parallel Phase Velocity Waves in the Presence of a D.C. Electric Field, Proc. Int. Conf. on Plasma Physics, Lausanne, 1984, Vol. I, p. 222 (1984); and Plasma Physics and Cont. Fusion 26: 1299 (1984)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    O. De Barbieri, F. Engelmann, A. Nocentini and J.-G. Wegrowe, Modelling of Lower Hybrid Current Ramp-Up and Current Maintenance during Transformer Recharging, The NET Team, Internal Report IN/84–105 (1984); and INTOR, Phase Two A, Part II, European Contributions, Report EUR FU BRU/XII - 133/85/EDV 10, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 1985, Chapter IVGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Nocentini, Current Drive by Electromagnetic Waves in Magnetically Confined Plasmas, Proc. Spring College on Plasma Physics, Trieste, 1985, to be published; and NET Report EURFU XII/361–85/39 (1985)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    O. De Barbieri and A. Nocentini, Electric Field Effects on the Current Driven by Electromagnetic Waves in Magnetically Confined Plasmas“, Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop on Mathematical Aspects of Fluid and Plasma Dynamics, Paris, 1985, to be published; and NET Report EURFU X II 361–85 /40 (1985)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Nocentini, On a Possible Explanation of Some Recent Experiments on Lower Hybrid Current Drive, Proc. 12th Eur. Conf. on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, Budapest, 1985, to be published; and NET Report EURFU XII/361–85/36 (1985)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.-G. Wégrowe, On the RF Current and the RF Power Absorption at Finite Levels of Injected Power in Lower-Hybrid Current Drive, Proc. 12th Eur. Conf. on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, Budapest, 1985, to be published.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.-G. Wégrowe, Potential of Lower-Hybrid Waves for Reactor Applica tions, Proc. Course and Workshop on Applications of RF Waves to Tokamak Plasmas, Varenna, 1985, to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J.-G. Wégrowe, Influence of the Lower Hybrid Wave Intensity on the Formation of a Fast Electron Tail, Power Absorption and Current Drive, Proc. Course and Workshop on Applications of RF Waves to Tokamak Plasmas, Varenna, 1985, to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    N.J. Fisch, Confining a Tokamak Plasma with RF Driven Currents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41: 873 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    C.F.F. Karney and N.J. Fisch, Numerical Studies of Current Generation by Radio-Frequency Traveling Waves, Phys. Fluids 22: 1817 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    N.J. Fisch, Conductivity of RF-Heated Plasma, Phys. Fluids 28: 245 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Folker Engelmann
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.The NET TeamGarchingGermany
  2. 2.FOM-Instituut voor Plasmafysica “Ri jnhuizen” Association EURATOM-FOMNieuwegeinThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations