Advertisement

Classification of Asymmetric Penicillia Using Expressions of Differentiation

  • Jens C. Frisvad
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 102)

Summary

In Subgenus Penicillium sect. Penicillium macromorphology, micromorphology, profiles of secondary metabolites and colony diameters are valuable criteria for the correct identification of isolates. Even though colours are used extensively in fungal taxonomy, secondary metabolites have not gained general acceptance as taxonomical characters. It is recommended that individual secondary metabolites (known or partially characterized) be used in species descriptions and keys in taxonomic works. For experimental names of Sect. Penicillium isolates, based on morphology and profiles of secondary metabolites, traditional epithets are suggested.

Keywords

Secondary Metabolite Mycophenolic Acid Cyclopiazonic Acid Aspergillus Parasiticus Fungal Taxonomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BENNETT, J.W., SILVERSTEIN, R.B. and KRUGER, S.J. 1981. Isolation and characterization of two nonaflatoxigenic classes of morphological variants of Aspergillus parasiticus. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1981: 952A - 955A.Google Scholar
  2. BLACKWELDER, R.E. 1964. Phyletic and phenetic versus omnispective classification. In “Phenetic and phylogenetic classification”, V.H. Heywood and J. McNeill, eds. London: Systematics Association. pp. 17–28.Google Scholar
  3. BRIDGE, P.D. and HAWKSWORTH, D.L. 1984. The Api ZYM enzyme testing system as an aid to the rapid identification of Penicillium isolates. Microbiol. Sci. 1: 232–234.Google Scholar
  4. CIEGLER, A., FENNELL, D.I., SANSING, G.A., DETROY, R.W. and BENNETT; G.A. 1973. Mycotoxin producing strains of Penicillium viridicatum: classification into subgroups. Appl. Microbiol. 26: 271–278.Google Scholar
  5. CIEGLER, A., LEE, L.S. and DUNN, J.J. 1981. Production of naphtoquinone mycotoxins and taxonomy of Penicillium viridicatum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 42: 446–449.Google Scholar
  6. FILTENBORG, O. and FRISVAD, J.C. 1980. A simple screening method for toxigenic moulds in pure cultures. Lebensm. Wiss.Technol. 13: 128–130.Google Scholar
  7. FILTENBORG, O., FRISVAD, J.C. and SVENSON, J.A. 1983. Simple screening method for molds producing intracellular mycotoxins in pure cultures. Appl. environ. Microbiol. 45: 581–585.Google Scholar
  8. FRISVAD, J.C. 1981. Physiological criteria and mycotoxin production as aids in classification of common asymmetric Penicillia. Appl. environ. Microbiol. 41: 568–579.Google Scholar
  9. FRISVAD, J.C. 1983. A selective and indicative medium for groups of Penicillium viridicatum producing different mycotoxins in cereals. J. appl. Bacteriol. 54: 409–416.Google Scholar
  10. FRISVAD, J.C. 1984. Expressions of secondary metabolism as fundamental characters in Penicillium taxonomy. In Toxigenic Fungi–their Toxins and Health Hazard“, H. Kurata and Y. Ueno, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 98–106.Google Scholar
  11. FRISVAD, J.C. and FILTENBORG, 0. 1983. Classification of tervertícilate Penicillia based on profiles of mycotoxins and other secondary metabolites. Appl. environ. Microbiol. 46: 1301–1310.Google Scholar
  12. HAWKSWORTH, D. L. and PITT, J. I. 1983. A new taxonomy for Monascus species based on cultural and microscopical data. Aust. J. Bot.. 31: 253–261.Google Scholar
  13. GHANI, H.M., LANCASTER, J.H and LARSH, H.W. 1975. Chromatographic separation of pigments produced by Arthroderma benSabouraudia 13: 51–61.Google Scholar
  14. HERMANSEN; K., FRISVAD; J.C., EMBORG, C. and HANSEN, J. 1984. Cyclopiazonic acid production by submerged cultures of Penicillium and Aspergillus strains. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 21: 253–261.Google Scholar
  15. JANZEN, D.H. 1977. Why fruits rot, seeds mold, and meat spoils. Am. Naturalist 111: 691–713.Google Scholar
  16. KELLER, G. and AMMIRATI, J.F. 1983. Chemotaxonomic significance of anthraquinone derivates in North American species of Dermocvbe section Sanquineae. Mycotaxon 18: 357–377.Google Scholar
  17. KOLE, H.K., SAMANTA, A.K., GOSWAMI, S.K. and BOSE, S.K. 1982. Attempt at gene reversion of a desired phenotype as a rescue against strain degeneration. J. appl. Bacteriol. 53: 163–167.Google Scholar
  18. MOHAMMED, Z.S., TODOROVA-DRAGANOVA, T.W. and LUCKNER, M. 1984. Nuclear inheritance of the biosynthesis of cyclopenin and cyclopenol in Penicillium cyclopium. Z. Allg. Mikrobiol. 24: 615–618.Google Scholar
  19. PITT, J.I. 1979. “The Genus Penicillium and its Teleomorphic States Eupenicillium and Talaromvices”. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. PITT, J.I. 1984. The value of physiological c.iaracters in the taxonomy of Penicillium–In “Toxigenic Fungi–their Toxins and Health Hazard” H. Kurata ad Y. Ueno, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 107–118.Google Scholar
  21. Ramírez, C., 1982. “Manual and Atlas of the Penicillia”. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  22. RAPER, K.B. and FENNELL, D.I. 1965. “The genus Aspergillus”. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  23. RAPER, K.B. and THOM. C. 1949. “Manual of the Penicillia”. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  24. SAMSON, R.A., STOLK, A.C. and HADLOK, R. 1976. Revision of the subjection Fasciculata of Penicillium and some allied species. Stud. mycol., Baarn 11: 1–47.Google Scholar
  25. SAMSON, R.A. ECKHARDT, C. and ORTH, R. 1977a. The taxonomy of Penicillium species from fermented cheeses. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 43: 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. SAMSON, R.A., HADLOK, R. and STOLK, A.C. 1977b. A taxonomic study of the Penicillium chrysogenum series. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 43: 26–274.Google Scholar
  27. SAMSON, R.A. and GAMS, W. 1984. The taxonomic situation in the Hyphomycete genera Penicillium, Aspergillus and Fusarium. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 50: 815–824.Google Scholar
  28. SNEATH, P.H.A. and SOKAL, R.R. 1973. “Numerical taxonomy”. San Fransisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  29. STOLK, A.C. and SAMSON, R.A. 1983. The ascomycete genus Eupenicillium and related Penicillium anamorphs. Stud. Mycol., Baarn 23: 1–149.Google Scholar
  30. SWAIN, T. 1977. Secondary compounds: primary products. Nova Acta Leopoldina Suppl. 7: 411–421.Google Scholar
  31. WICKLOW, D.T. 1984. Ecological approaches to the study of mycotoxigenic fungi. In “Toxigenic Fungi–their Toxins and Health Hazard”, H. Kurata and Y. Ueno, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 33–43.Google Scholar
  32. WOLD, S., ALBANO, C., DUNN, W.J., III, ESBENSEN, K., HELLBERG, S., JOHANSSON, E. and SJOSTTROM, M. 1983. Pattern recog-Google Scholar
  33. nition: finding and using regularities in multivariate data. - In “Food Research and Data Analysis”, H, Marttens and H. Russworm Jr., eds. London: Applied Science.Google Scholar
  34. ZENDAM, Z., KHALIL, S. and LUCKNER, m. 1982. P-factor, a developmental hormone of Penicillium cyclopium. Phytochemistry 21: 839–842.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jens C. Frisvad
    • 1
  1. 1.Food Technology LaboratoryTechnical University of DenmarkLyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations