Advertisement

The Theory and Practice of Distinguishing Species of the Aspergillus Flavus Group

  • Maren A. Klich
  • John I. Pitt
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 102)

Summary

Sixty-two Aspergillus flavus group isolates from the SRRC and FRR culture collections were studied and identified independently by the authors. Strains were grown under standard conditions and observations recorded for a variety of morphological features at various stages of colony development. Aflatoxin production and response on a special A. flavus and A. parasiticus medium were also recorded. A discriminant analysis was performed to further study species relatedness. It was concluded that A. flavus, A. parasiticus, A. sojae, A. oryzae, and A. tamarii could be reliably separated from one another by morphological and microscopic criteria. The most salient distinguishing features were: 1) colony colour; 2) conidial size and roughening; 3) vesicle diameter; 4) conidiophore length; and 5) presence of metulae.

Aflatoxins were indicators of both A. flavus and A. parasiticus while the presence of G aflatoxins was a distinguishing feature of A. parasiticus. Columnarity of conidial heads was found to be an inconsistent character even within isolate; therefore, A. flavus var. columnaris was not distinct from the species. Isolates previously identified as A. toxicarius were identified as either A. flavus or A. parasiticus.

Keywords

Discriminant Analysis Malt Extract Agar Colony Development Aspergillus Parasiticus Vesicle Diameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. CHRISTENSEN, M. 1981. A synoptic key and evaluation of species in the Aspergillus flavus group. Mycologia 72: 1056–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. FILTENBORG, O. and FRISVAD, J.C. 1980. A simple screening method for toxigenic moulds in pure cultures. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 13: 128–130.Google Scholar
  3. KOZAKIEWICZ, M. 1982. The identity and typification of Aspergillus parasiticus. Mycotaxon 15: 293–305.Google Scholar
  4. MURAKAMI, H. 1971. Classification of the koji mold. J. gen. appl. Microbiol., Tokyo 17: 281–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. MURAKAMI, H., HAYASHI, K and USHIJIMA, S. 1982. Useful key characters separating three Aspergillus taxa: A. sojae, A. parasiticus and A. toxicarius. J. gen. appl. Microbiol., Tokyo 28: 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. PITT, J.I. 1979. “The genus Penicillium and its Teleomorphic States Eupenicillium and Talaromvces”. London: Academic press.Google Scholar
  7. PITT, J.I., HOCKING, A.D. and GLENN, D.R.. 1983. An improved medium for the detection of Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus. J. appl. Bacteriol. 54: 109–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. RAPER, K.B. and FENNELL, D.I. 1965. “The genus Aspergillus”. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maren A. Klich
    • 1
    • 2
  • John I. Pitt
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Southern Regional Research CenterU.S. Department of AgricultureNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Division of Food ResearchCSIRONorth RydeAustralia

Personalised recommendations