Skip to main content

The Trade-off Between Expected Risk and the Potential for Large Accidents

  • Chapter
Low-Probability High-Consequence Risk Analysis

Part of the book series: Advances in Risk Analysis ((AIRA,volume 2))

Abstract

Complex modern technologies often have the potential, though with very low probabilities, to cause accidents which could affect a large number of people at the same time. This is a topic of great concern to the public. Therefore, several authors have proposed safety goals which give different weights to such large consequences. However, it is difficult to decide which rules should be applied, and it is even more difficult to obtain the weighting factors. This paper proposes that such rules and weighting factors may be obtained from historical data analysis.

Generally, it can be observed that with time the expected value of the risks of technologies are reduced. However, this achievement often has to be paid for creating the potential for LP/HC accidents. Such a trend can, for example, be observed with airplane accidents. This study analyzed such accidents between 1947 to 1980. If the largest number of fatalities in a single accident in each year is plotted against the average number of fatalities per passenger-km (i. e., the expected value) in that year, it is found that an inverse exponential relationship exists.

This finding can also be expressed in the form that the product of the expected value and the weighted largest number of fatalities in each year was constant

$$ EV{({C_{\max }} - b)^c} = a $$

where

  • EV = expected value of risk in a given year

  • Cmax = largest number of fatalities in a give year

  • a, b, c = constants obtained from the historical trend.

This paper presents the relevant data for airplane accidents and describes the methematical relationship obtained. These results are being discussed with regard to their implications for safety decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W. Häfele et al., Energy in a Finite World, A Global Systems Analysis, Ballinger Publ. Co., Massachusetts (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. V. Cohen and D. K. Pritchard, Comparative Risks of Electricity Production Systems: A Critical Survey of the Literature, Res. Paper No. 11, Health and Safety Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1975), Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, WASH-1400, NUREG-75/014 (October 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deutsche Risikostudie Kernkraftwerke, Eine Untersuchung zu dem durch Störfälle in Kernkraftwerken verursachten Risiko (TÜV Rheinland), IBSN 3-021059-67-4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Canvey Island Study, Canvey: Summary of an Investigation of Potential Hazards from Operations in the Canvey Island/Thurrock Area, ISBN 0-11-883203-4, Health and Safety Executive, London (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Wilson, The Costs of Safety, New Scientist, 68:274–275 (October 30, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. R. Farmer, Siting Criteria-A New Approach, Proceedings of a Symposium on Containment and Siting of Nuclear Power Plants, IAEA-SM-89/34, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, An Approach to Quantitative Safety Goals for Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-0739 (October, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Civil Aviation Authority, London, World Airline Accident Summary.

    Google Scholar 

  10. International Civil Aviation Organization, Accident/Incident Data Reporting.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. C. Black and F. Niehaus, Comparison of Risks and Benefits Among Different Energy Systems, in: Interactions of Energy and Climate (W. Bach et al., eds.), Proceedings of an International Workshop on “Energy/Climate Interactions,” held in Muenster, FRG, March 1980, Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrect.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Atomwissenschaft (June 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Swaton, Attitudes toward Risk. A Cross-Cultural Comparison, Presented at the Status Seminar “Tasks, Methods, and Predictive Power of Risk Research,” organized by the University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld (November 24–25, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niehaus, F., de Leon, G., Cullingford, M. (1984). The Trade-off Between Expected Risk and the Potential for Large Accidents. In: Waller, R.A., Covello, V.T. (eds) Low-Probability High-Consequence Risk Analysis. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1818-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1818-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1820-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1818-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics