Abstract
Free-response survey items were used to study industrial risk perception with six groups of respondents: Nuclear Engineers, Chemical Engineers, Science Writers, and two groups selected from the general public. Several questionnaire items referred to “the closest hazardous facility that concerns you.” Because of the free-response format, respondents were able to nominate any industrial facility. About half of the respondents identified a hazardous facility within ten miles; appropriately, respondents selected on the basis of living near to hazardous facilities (one of the general public groups) reported hazardous facilities closer to them than did the other groups. The most frequently identified facility was a Nuclear Power Plant; this was true for all groups except the Nuclear Engineers. Pollution and Leak of Radioactive Materials were the most frequently mentioned risks. Nuclear Power Plants were strongly differentiated from other facilities by respondents, and a Leak of Radioactive Material from a Nuclear Power Plant was the most frequently mentioned exposure path. Other questionnaire items dealt with respondents’ views of two specific facilities, a Toxic Chemical Disposal Facility and a Nuclear Waste Disposal Facility. Respondents who were either physically closer to or professionally identified with hazardous facilities were distinguished from others by lower levels of concern about adverse effects, particularly health effects. This was coupled, however, with higher levels of concern for effects to specific groups of living persons, particularly workers at hazardous facilities. The discussion of these results is focused on three significant risk perception problems. First, public perception of industrial risks, with emphasis on Nuclear Power and Nuclear Waste Disposal. Second, the concern (or lack of it) of persons living today for persons living in future generations. Third, the appropriate use and interpretation of free- and fixed-response items in survey research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
B. Fischhoff, S. Lichtenstein, P. Slovic, R. Keeney, and S. Derby, Approaches to Acceptable Risk: A Critical Guide, NUREG/CR-1614, Washington, D.C., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1980).
C. Selltiz, L. S. Wrightsman, and S. W. Cook, Research Methods in Social Relations (3rd Edition), Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York (1976).
T. C. Earle, M. K. Lindell, and W. L. Rankin, Risk Perception, Risk Evaluation, and Human Values Concerning Nuclear Waste Management, BHARC (411/81/007), Battelle Human Affairs Research Centers, Seattle, Washington (1981).
P. F. Larzarsfeld, The controversy over detailed interviews: An offer for negotiation, Public Opinion Quarterly, 8:38–60 (1944).
E. R. Babbie, Survey Research Methods, Wadsworth, Belmont, California (1973).
H. Blumer, Public opinion and public opinion polling, American Sociological Review, 12:542–554 (October 1948).
B. G. Glaser and A. Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Aldine, Chicago, Illinois (1968).
D. Willer, Scientific Sociology: Theory and Method, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1951).
B. D. Melber, S. M. Nealey, C. S. Weiss, and W. L. Rankin, Nuclear Power and the Public: Update of Collected Survey Research, BHARC (411/79/020), Battelle Human Affairs Research Centers, Seattle, Washington (1979).
D. Dillman, Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method, Wiley, Somerset, New Jersey (1978).
B. D. Melber, S. M. Nealey, J. Hammersla, and W. L. Rankin, Nuclear Power and the Public: Analysis of Collected Survey Research, USDOE Report PNL-2430, Battelle Human Affairs Research Centers, Seattle, Washington (1977).
P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein, Images of disaster: Perception and acceptance of risks from nuclear power in Energy Risk Management (G. Goodman and W. Rowe, eds.), Academic Press, London (1979).
P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein, Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk, in Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough” (R. Schwing and W. A. Albers, Jr., eds.), Plenum Press, New York (1980).
R. Routley and V. Routley, Nuclear Energy and Obligations to the Future, in: Responsibilities to Future Generations: Environmental Ethics (E. Partridge, ed.), Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York (1981).
D. H. Meadows, D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. W. Behrens, The Limits to Growth, Signet, New York (1972).
P. G. Brown and W. L. Rankin, A proxy for the unborn, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 35(9):64–65 (1979).
E. Dalaltre, Responsibilities and Future Persons, Ethics, 82: 256 (April,1972).
E. Partridge, Why Care About the Future?, in: Responsibilities to Future Generations: Environmental Ethics (E. Partridge, ed.), Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York (1981) (see #14).
T. H. Thompson, Are we obligated to future others?, in: Responsibilities to Future Generations: Environmental Ethics (E. Partridge, ed.), Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York (1981), (see #14).
R. L. Heilbroner, An Inquiry into the Human Prospect, Norton, New York (1974).
G. Hardin, The Limits of Altruism, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana (1977).
N. S. Care, Future generations, public policy, and the motivation problem, Environmental Ethics, 3(41):195–213 (1982).
H. A. Latin, Environmental deregulation and consumer decision-making under uncertainty, Harvard Environmental Law Review, 6(2):187–239 (1982).
M. K. Lindell and T. C. Earle, Comparative Analysis of Risk Characteristics of Nuclear Waste Repositories and Other Disposal Facilities, BHARC (411/81/005), Battelle Human Affairs Research Centers, Seattle, Washington (1981).
R. H. Turner, J. M. Nigg, D. H. Paz, and B. S. Young, Community Response to Earthquake Threat in Southern California, Part Nine: Change and Stability in the Public Response, Institute for Social Science Research, University of California, Los Angeles (1981).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Earle, T.C., Lindell, M.K. (1984). Public Perception of Industrial Risks: A Free-Response Approach. In: Waller, R.A., Covello, V.T. (eds) Low-Probability High-Consequence Risk Analysis. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1818-8_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1818-8_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1820-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1818-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive