Skip to main content

Analysis Needed to Assess Risk: A Case Study on Radionuclides

  • Chapter
Low-Probability High-Consequence Risk Analysis

Part of the book series: Advances in Risk Analysis ((AIRA,volume 2))

  • 165 Accesses

Abstract

Congress has enacted a number of laws which require the protection of human life, health, and the environment. The federal agencies implementing these laws frequently use risk analysis in determining measures to reduce these risks. The major issue facing the agencies is determining an acceptable risk level. This level represents a major concern to society and industry.

While it is easy to state that an agency must determine the significance of the risk before proceeding, a significant risk analysis is difficult and complex to execute. The purpose of this paper is to point out the need for series of disciplines in conducting a risk evaluation. It is not an assessment of federal agencies risk analysis work. For illustrative purposes, the paper examines the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) radionuclides proposed rule-making process under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute-448 U.S. 607 (July 2, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Textile Manufacturers Institute v. Donovan-49 USLW 4720 (June 14, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ethyl Corporation v. EPA v. EPA, 541 F. 2d 1, 11-13 (D.C. Cir.), cert, denied, 426 U.S. 941 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 44 Federal Register 76738 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. U.S. EPA, Draft Report, Technical Support for the Evaluation and Control of Emission of Radioactive Materials to Ambient Air, Contract No. 68-01-5142).

    Google Scholar 

  6. U.S. EPA, A Directory of Parameters Used in a Series of Assessment Applications of the AIRDOS-EPA and DARTAB Computer Coves (ORNL-5710) (March 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. U.S. EPA, Estimates of Health Risk from Exposure to Radioactive Pollutants (ORNL/TM-7745) (November 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. U.S. EPA, DARTAB, A Program to Combine Airborne Radionuclide Environmental Exposure Data with Dosimetric and Health Effects Data to Generate Tablualtions of Predicted Health Impacts (ORNL-5692) (August 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. EPA, AIRDOSE: A Computerized Methodology for Estimating Environmental Concentrations and Dose to Man from Airborne Releases of Radionuclides, EPA 520/1-79-009 (December 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. U.S. EPA, Preliminary Report, Radiological Impact Caused by Emission of Radionuclides into the Air in the U.S., EPA 520/7-79-006 (December 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. National Academy of Sciences, The Effect on Population of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sasaki, B.R. (1984). Analysis Needed to Assess Risk: A Case Study on Radionuclides. In: Waller, R.A., Covello, V.T. (eds) Low-Probability High-Consequence Risk Analysis. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1818-8_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1818-8_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1820-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1818-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics