Skip to main content

State-of-the-Art of Risk Assessment of Chemical Plants in Europe

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Advances in Risk Analysis ((AIRA,volume 2))

Abstract

The manufacture and processing of chemicals has a long history and for most of its existence the industry has been associated with unpleasant side effects such as smells, fires, and pollution. It is only in recent years that three factors have combined to bring the new aspect of possible catastrophic accidents to public attention. These are:

  • ○ The significant increase in scale and complexity in the manufacturing processes involved.

  • ○ The occurrence of a number of major accidents (albeit not the worst conceivable).

  • ○ The increasing public awareness of risks in the context of other industries, notably nuclear power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. A. Carson and C J. Mumford, “An analysis of incidents involving major hazards in the chemical industry,” J. Hazardous Materials, 3:2 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lord Robens, “Safety and Health and Work,” Cmnd. 5034, HMSO, London (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. L. Wells, C. J. Seagrave, and R. M. C. Whiteway, Flowsheeting for Safety, Institution of Chemical Engineers, Ruby (1977), pp. 44-45.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chemical Industry Safety and Health Council, A Guide to Hazard and Operability Studies, Chemical Industries Association, London (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dienst Centraal Milienbeheer Rijnmond, Risk Analysis of Six Potentially Hazardous Industrial Objects in the Rijnmond Area, a Pilot Study, Report to the Rijnmond Public Authorith, Publ. D. Reidel Publishing Co. (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Shaw and F. Briscoe, Evaporation from Spills of Hazardous Liquids on Land and Water, UKAEA Report SRD R100 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. A. Cox, Methods for Predicting the Atmospheric Dispersion of Massive Releases of Flammable Vapor, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 6:141–149 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. TNO Bureau for Industrial Safety, Methods for the Calculation of the Physical Effects of the Escape of Dangerous Material, Directorate-General of Labour, Voorburg, Netherlands (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Provinciale Waterstaat Groningen, Pollution control and use of norms in Groningen — criteria for risks related to dangerous goods, Groningen, Netherlands (April 1979), pp. 43-57.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Royal Society Study Group on Risk, The Assessment and Perception of Risk, The Royal Society, London (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. H. Howland, Hazard analysis and the human element, Proc. 3rd Int. Loss Prevention Symp., Basel (September 15–19, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. Pilz, What is wrong with risk analysis? Proc. 3rd Int. Loss Prevention Symp., Basel (September 15–19, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Bjordal, Is risk analysis obsolete? Proc. 3rd Int. Loss Prevention Symp., Basel (September 15–19, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. A. Cox and P. J. Comer, Development of low-cost risk analysis methods for process plant, Proc. Int. Symp. on Assessment of Major Hazards, I. Chem. E. Symposium Series NO. 71:14–16 (April 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. A. Cox, Improving Risk Assessment Methods for Process Plant, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 6:249–260 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Health and Safety Executive, Canvey: An Investigation of Potential Hazards from Operations in the Canvey Island/Thurrock area, HMSO, London (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Health and Safety Executive, Canvey — a second report, HMSO, London (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. F. Blokker, R. A. Cox, H. J. D. Lans, and F. H. Meppelder, Evaluation of risks associated with process industries in the Rijnmond area — a pilot study, Proc. 3rd Int. Loss Prevention Symp., Basel (September 15–19, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Health and Safety Executive Assessment of the hazard from radio frequency ignition at the Shell and Esso sites at Braefoot Bay and Mossmorran, Fife., HSE (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stichting ‘CONCAWE,’ Performance of oil-industry cross-country pipelines in Western Europe; Statistical summary of reported spillages — 1980, The Hague (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, Guidelines for Safety Evaluation of Platform Conceptual Design (August 1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cox, R.A., Slater, D.H. (1984). State-of-the-Art of Risk Assessment of Chemical Plants in Europe. In: Waller, R.A., Covello, V.T. (eds) Low-Probability High-Consequence Risk Analysis. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1818-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1818-8_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1820-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1818-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics