Valvular Heart Disease in the Elderly

  • David C. Booth
  • Anthony M. Demaria
Part of the Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine book series (DICM, volume 31)


Valvular heart disease in the elderly has commanded increasing attention in the past decade [1–5]. A prime reason has been the steady lowering of operative risk from open heart surgery [6–10]. Moreover, the development of noninvasive diagnostic procedures such as echocardiography and radionuclide ventriculography allows accurate confirmation of clinical diagnoses by noninvasive procedures in many cases [11–17]. With regard to therapy, criteria based on noninvasive studies have been proposed for use in clinical decision making in selected disease states.


Aortic Valve Mitral Valve Aortic Stenosis Mitral Regurgitation Infective Endocarditis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Wenger NK. Selected cardiac problems in the elderly patient. J Med Ass Ga 68: 1033, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burch GE. Interesting aspects of geriatric cardiology. Am Heart J 89: 99, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kotler MN, Mintz GS, Parry WR, and Segal B. Bedside diagnosis of organic murmurs in the elderly. Geriatrics 36: 107, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sugiura M, Ohkawa S, Hiraoka K, Kitano K, et al. A clinicopathologic study on valvular heart diseases in 1,000 consecutive autopsy of the aged. Jpn Heart J 22: 1, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Collins P, Cotton RE, and Duff RS. Symptomatic mitral mysomatous transformation in the elderly. Thorax 31: 765, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jamieson WRE, Dooner J, Munro AI, et al. Cardiac valve replacement in the elderly: A review of 320 consecutive cases. Circulation 64: 11177–11183, 1981.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murphy ES, Lawson RM, Starr A, and Rahimtoola SH. Severe aortic stenosis in patients 60 years of age or older: Left ventricular function and 10-year survival after valve replacement. Circulation 64: 11184–11191, 1981.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Copeland JG, Griepp RB, Stinson EB, and Shumway NE. Isolated aortic valve replacement in patients older than 65 years. JAMA 237: 1578, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hochberg MS, Morrow AG, Michaelis LL, McIntosh CL, Redwood DR, and Epstein SE. Aortic valve replacement in the elderly. Encouraging postoperative clinical and hemodynamic results. Arch Surg 112: 1475, 1977.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quinlan R, Cohn LH, and Collins JJ. Determinants of survival following cardiac operations in elderly patients. Chest 68: 498, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feigenbaum H. The valve of echocardiography in older patients. Geriatrics 30 (1): 106, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tam PH. Mitral and aortic valvular disease in the elderly. NY State J Med 79: 378, 1979.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flohr KH, Weir EK, and Chesler E. Diagnosis of aortic stenosis in older age groups using external carotid pulse recording and phonocardiography. Br Heart J 45: 577, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Higgins CB, Reinke RT, Gosink BB, and Leopold GR. The significance of mitral valve prolapse in middle-aged and elderly men. Am Heart J 91: 292, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schwartz A, Vignola PA, Walker HJ, King ME, and Goldblatt A. Echocardiographic estimation of aortic-valve gradient in aortic stenosis. Ann Int Med 89: 329, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Borer JS, Bacharach SL, Green MV, et al. Exercise-induced left ventricular dysfunction in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation: Assessment with radionuclide cineangiography. Am J Cardiol 42: 351, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Port S, Cobb FR, Coleman RE, and Jones RH. Effect of age on the response of the left ventricular ejection fraction to exercise. N Engl J Med 303: 1133, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burch GE. Interesting aspects of geriatric cardiology. Am Heart J 89: 99, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Edwards JE. Calcific aortic stenosis: Pathologic features. Mayo CIin Proc 36: 444, 1961.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roberts WC. The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: A study of 85 autopsy cases. Am J Cardiol 26: 72, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pomerance A. Pathogenesis of aortic stenosis and its relationship to age. Br Heart J 34: 569, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rotman M, Morris JJ, Behar VS, Peter RH, and Kong Y. Aortic valvular disease: Comparison of types and their medical and surgical management. Am J Med 51: 241, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Uricchio JF, Sinha KP, Bentivoglio L, and Goldberg H. A study of combined mitral and aortic stenosis. Ann Int Med 51: 668, 1959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vollebergh FEMB and Becker AE. Minor variations of cusp size in tricuspid aortic valves. Possible link with isolated aortic stenosis. Br Heart J 30: 1006, 1977.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rapaport E. Natural history of aortic and mitral valve disease. Am J Cardiol 35: 221, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Spodick DH, Sugiura T, Doi Y, Paladiso D, and Haffty B. Rate of rise of the carotid pulse. An investigation of observer error in a common clinical measurement. Am J Cardiol 49: 159, 1982.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    DeMaria AN, Bommer W, Joye J, Lee G, Boutellu J, and Mason DT. Valve and limitations of cross-sectional echocardiography of the aortic valve in the diagnosis and quantification of valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 62: 304, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Williams DE, Sahn DJ, and Friedman WF. Cross-sectional echocardiographic localization of sites of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Am J Cardiol 37: 250, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    St. John Sutton MG, St. John Sutton M, Oldershaw P, et al. Valve replacement without preoperative cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med 305: 1233, 1981.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brandenburg RO. No more routine catheterization for valvular heart disease? N Engl J Med 305: 1277, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Young JB, Quinones MA, Waggoner AD, and Miller RR. Diagnosis and quantification of aortic stenosis by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 58 (Suppl II): 42, 1978 (abstract).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bonchek LI. Current status of cardiac valve replacement: Selection of a prosthesis and indications for operation. Am Heart J 101: 96, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ferrans VJ, Boyce SW, Billingham ME, Jones M, Ishihara T, and Roberts WC. Calcific deposits in porcine bioprostheses: Structure and pathogenesis. Am J Cardiol 46: 721, 1980.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cohn LH, Mudge GH, Pratter F, and Collins JJ. Five-to eight-year follow-up of patients undergoing porcine heart-valve replacement. N Engl J Med 304: 258, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kirklin JW. The replacement of cardiac valves. N Engl J Med 304: 291, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bonow RO, Kent KM, Rosing DR, et al. Aortic valve replacement without myocardial revascularization in patients with combined aortic valvular and coronary artery disease. Circulation 63: 243, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Richardson JV, Kouchoukos NT, Wright JO III, and Karp RB. Combined aortic valve replacement and myocardial revascularization: Results in 220 patients. Circulation 59: 75, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kirklin JW and Kouchoukos NT. Aortic valve replacement without myocardial revascularization. Circulation 63: 252, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Engloff E. Aortic incompetence: Clinical hemodynamic and angiographic evaluation. Acta Med Scand 193 (Suppl 538): 3, 1972.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stapleton JR and Harvey WP. Clinical analysis of aortic incompetence. Postgrad Med 46: 156, 1969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Roberts WC, Dangel JC, and Bulkley BH. Noinrheumatic valvular heart disease: A clinicopathologic survey of 27 different conditions causing valvular dysfunction. In Likoff W (ed), Valvular Heart Disease. Cardiovasc Clin 5:333, 1973.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Roberts WC. Anatomically isolated valvular disease: The case against its being of rheumatic etiology. Am J Med 49: 151, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Waller BF, Zoltick JM, Rosen JH, et al. Severe aortic regurgitation from systemic hypertension (without aortic dissection) requiring aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol 49: 473, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Prewitt TA. Syphilitic aortic insufficiency. Its increased incidence in the elderly. JAMA 211: 637, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fortuin NJ and Craige E. On the mechanism of the Austin Flint murmur. Circulation 45: 558, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Morganroth J, Perloff JK, Zeldis SM, and Dunkman WB. Acute severe aortic regurgitation. Ann Int Med 87: 223, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Henry WL, Bonow RO, Borer JS, et al. Observations on the optimum time for operative intervention for aortic regurgitation. I. Evaluation of the results of aortic valve replacement in symptomatic patients. Circulation 61: 471, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Henry WL, Bonow RO, Rosing DR, and Epstein SE. Observations on the optimum time for operative intervention for aortic regurgitation. I. Serial echocardiographic evaluation of asymptomatic patients. Circulation 61: 484, 1980.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Roberts WC and PerloffJK. Mitral valvular disease. A clinicopathologic survey of the conditions causing the mitral valve to function abnormally. Ann Int Med 77: 939, 1972.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Collins P, Cotton RE, and Duff RS. Symptomatic mitral mytomatous transformation in the elderly. Thorax 31: 765, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Fulkerson PK, Beaver BM, Auseon JC, and Graber HL. Calcification of the mitral anulus. Etiology, clinical associations, complications and therapy. Am J Med 66: 967, 1979.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    D’Cruz I, Panetta F, Cohen H, and Glick G. Submitral calcification or sclerosis in elderly patients: M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography in “mitral anulus calcification. ” Am J Cardiol 44: 31, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hammer WJ, Roberts WC, and de Leon AC. “Mitral stenosis” secondary to combined “massive” mitral anular calcific deposits and small, hypertrophied left ventricles. Hemodynamic documentation in four patients. Am J Med 64: 371, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Jeresaty RM. Mitral Valve Prolapse. New York: Raven Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Barnett HJM, Boughner DR, Taylor DW, Cooper PE, Kostuk WJ, and Nichol PM. Further evidence relating mitral valve prolapse to cerebral ischemic events. N Engl J Med 302: 139, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Knopman D, Anderson DC, Greenland P, Mikell F, Asinger R, and Good D. Mitral valve prolapse and cerebral ischemic events in the elderly. N Engl J Med 303: 641, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mills P, Rose R, Hollingsworth J, Amara I, and Craige E. Long-term prognosis of mitral valve prolapse. N Engl J Med 297: 13, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schuler G, Peterson KL, Johnson A, et al. Temporal response of left ventricular performance to mitral valve surgery. Circulation 59: 1218, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ross J. Left ventricular function and timing of surgical treatment in valvular heart disease. Ann Intern Med 94: 498, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hochberg MS, Derkae WM, Conkle DM, McIntosh CL, Epstein SE, and Morrow AG. Mitral valve replacement in elderly patients. Encouraging postoperative results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 77: 422, 1979.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Shore DF, Wong P, and Paneth M. Results of mitral valvuloplasty with a suture plication technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 79: 349, 1980.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Limas CJ. Mitral stenosis in the elderly. Geriatrics 26 (2, Nov): 75, 1971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lang R, Klein HO, Guerrero J, Segni ED, David D, Sareli P, and Kaplinsky E. Verapamil improves maximal exercise capacity in digitalized patients with chronic atrial fibrillation: A double-blind crossover study. Circulation 64(Suppl IV ): 1133 (abstract), 1981.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Johnson LW, Grossman W, Dalen JE, and Dexter L. Pulmonic stenosis in the adult: Longterm follow-up results. N Engl J Med 287: 1159, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Chino F, Kodama A, Otake M, and Dock DS. Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis in a Japanese autopsy sample. A review of eighty cases. Am Heart J 90: 190, 1975.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Klein RS, Rocco RA, Catalano MT, Edberg SC, Casey JI, and Steigbigel NH. Association of Streptococcus bovis with carcinoma of the colon. N Engl J Med 297: 800, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    McAllister HA. Primary tumors and cysts of the heart and pericardium. Curr Probl Cardiol 4: 1–51, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bashery RI and Nochumson S. Cardiac myxoma. Biochemical analyses and evidence for its neoplastic nature. NY State J Med 79: 29, 1979.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sayler WR, Page DL, and Hutchins GM. The development of cardiac myxomas and papillary endocardial lesions from mucal thrombus. Am Heart J 89: 4, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Donahoo JS, Weiss JL, Gardner TJ, Fortuin JN, and Brawley RK. Current management of atrial myxoma with emphasis on a new diagnostic technique. Ann Surg 189: 763, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Lappe Dl, Bulkley GH, and Weiss JL. Two-dimensional echocardiography diagnosis of the left atrial myxoma. Chest 74: 55, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Walton JA, Kahn DR, and Willis PW. Recurrence of a left atrial myxoma. Am J Cardiol 29: 872, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • David C. Booth
  • Anthony M. Demaria

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations