Double Beta Decay: Recent Developments and Projections

  • F. T. AvignoneIII
  • R. L. Brodzinski
  • D. P. Brown
  • J. C. EvansJr.
  • W. K. Hensley
  • J. H. Reeves
  • N. A. Wogman
Part of the Progress in Physics book series (PMP, volume 9)


A report of recent events in both theoretical and experimental aspects of double beta decay is given. General theoretical considerations, recent developments in nuclear structure theory, geochronological determinations of half lives and ratios as well as laboratory experiments are discussed with emphasis on the past three years. Some projections are given.


Matrix Element Majorana Neutrino Neutrino Mass Matrix Heavy Neutrino Shell Model Calculation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    S. P. Rosen and H. Primakoff, in Alpha-beta and gamma-ray spectroscopy, 2nd ed. (ed. K. Siegbahn; North Holland Publ. Co. Amsterdam, 1965 )Google Scholar
  2. E. Fiorini, Rev. Nuovo Cim. 2 (1971), D. Bryman and C. Picciotto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, (1978) 11.Google Scholar
  3. [2]
    “Science Underground”, AIP Conference Proceedings No. 96, ed. M. M. Nieto, W. C. Haxton, C. M. Hoffman, E. W. Kolb, V. D. Sanberg and J. W. Toevs. New York, 1983 (see C. S. Wu, p. 374).Google Scholar
  4. [3]
    S. P. Rosen, p. 352 of ref. (2).Google Scholar
  5. [4]
    H. Primakoff and S. P. Rosen, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 31, (1981) 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. P. H. Frampton and P. Vogel, Phys. Repts. 82, (1982) 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [5]
    G. Arnison et al., Phys. Lett. 122B, (1983) 103.Google Scholar
  8. [6]
    S. P. Rosen in “Gauge Theories, Massive Neutrinos and Proton Decay,” ed. A. Perlmutter ( Plenum Press, New York 1981 ) p. 333.Google Scholar
  9. [7]
    M. Doi, T. Kotani, H. Nishimura, K. Okuda and E. Takasugi, Phys. Lett. 103B, (1981) 219.Google Scholar
  10. [8]
    L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Lett. 107B (1981) 77. See also the discussion by Doi et al., Phys. Lett. 102B, (1981) 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Halprin, S. T. Petkov and S. P. Rosen, preprint (1983).Google Scholar
  12. [9]
    V. A. Lubimov, E. G. Novikov, V. Z. Nozik, E. F. Tretyakov and V. S. Kosik, Phys. Lett. 94B, (1980) 266.Google Scholar
  13. [10]
    H. Primakoff and S. P. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 184 (1969) 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [11]
    W. C. Haxton (private communication, to be published).Google Scholar
  15. [12]
    E. Bellotti, E. Fiorini, C. Liguori, A. Pullia, A. Sarracino and L. Zanotti (p. 430 Ref. 2), Phys. Lett. 121B (1983) 72. Also E. Fiorini, These Proceedings.Google Scholar
  16. [13]
    R. K. Bardin, P. J. Gollon, J. D. Ullman and C. S. Wu, Nucl. Phys. A15B (1970) 337. For 82Se see Cleveland et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, (1975) 737.Google Scholar
  17. [14]
    V. A. Khodel, Phys. Lett. B32 (1970) 583.Google Scholar
  18. [15]
    W. C. Haxton, G. J. Stephenson, Jr., and D. Strottman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, (1981) 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (These calculations have been slightly improved by W. C. Haxton by avoiding some of the simplifying approximations). Phys. Rev. D26, (1982) 1805.Google Scholar
  20. [16]
    W. C. Haxton, G. J. Stephenson, Jr., and D. Strottman, Phys. Rev. D25 (1981) 2360.Google Scholar
  21. [17]
    W. T. Baldridge and J. P. Vary, Phys. Rev. C14 (1976) 2246; T.T.S. Kuo and G. E. Brown, Nucl. Phys. A114 (1968) 241.Google Scholar
  22. [18]
    T. Kirsten (in ref. [2]); T. Kirsten, H. Richter and E. Jessberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, (1982) 475.Google Scholar
  23. [19]
    M. Doi, T. Kotani, H. Nishiura and E. Takasugi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 69, (1983) 602; 66 (1981) 1765; 66 (1981) 1730.Google Scholar
  24. [20]
    L. Zamick and N. Auerbach, Phys. Rev. C26, (1982) 2185.Google Scholar
  25. [21]
    W. C. Haxton and G. J. Stephenson, Jr., preprint LA-UR-83–417 submitted to Phys. Rev. C.Google Scholar
  26. [22]
    T. Kirsten, W. Geutner, and 0. A. Schaeffer, Z. Phys. 202 (1967) 273;Google Scholar
  27. T. Kirsten, O. A. Schaeffer, E. Norton and R. W. Stoner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, (1968) 1300.Google Scholar
  28. [23]
    B. Srinivasan, E. C. Alexander, Jr., R. D. Beaty, D. Sinclair and 0. K. Manuel, Econ. Geol. 68 (1973) 252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [24]
    E. Hennecke, 0. Manuel, D. Sabu, Phys. Rev. C11, (1975) 1378.Google Scholar
  30. [25]
    Manuel (private communication).Google Scholar
  31. [26]
    M. K. Moe and D. D. Lowenthal, Phys. Rev. C22 (1980) 2186. Also see Cleveland et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, (1975) 737.Google Scholar
  32. [27]
    M. K. Moe and A. A. Hahn (in ref. 2).Google Scholar
  33. [28]
    F. T. Avignone, III, R. L. Brodzinski, D. P. Brown, J. C. Evans, Jr., W. K. Hensley, J. H. Reeves and N. A. Wogman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, (1983) 721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. T. AvignoneIII
    • 1
  • R. L. Brodzinski
    • 2
  • D. P. Brown
    • 2
  • J. C. EvansJr.
    • 2
  • W. K. Hensley
    • 2
  • J. H. Reeves
    • 2
  • N. A. Wogman
    • 2
  1. 1.University of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Battelle Pacific Northwest LaboratoryRichlandUSA

Personalised recommendations