Advertisement

An Evaluation of Direct Aging to Achieve Optimum Mechanical Properties for the Metastable Beta Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al Alloy

  • R. Chait
  • T. S. DeSisto

Abstract

Metastable beta titanium alloys are usually given a conventional solution treating and aging heat treatment to achieve high strength. This has been the case for the alloy Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al. The present paper examines an alternate heat treatment for Ti-8823, that of direct aging after fabrication. Material for this study was fabricated by extrusion processes that provide reduction of a) 30%; and b) 83–84% during hot working for which two different heat treatments are considered: a conventional solution treatment and age, and a direct age. The extrusion temperature was also varied for the material that had undergone the larger amount of reduction. Static tension, torsion, and fracture toughness properties are determined for various through-the-thickness locations. Also reported are crack growth data and uniaxial S-N fatigue curves obtained from tests run at an R ratio of 0.1. The information from these tests enables a comparison between the solution treated and aged, and the direct aged conditions for the larger amount of reduction. Except for the crack growth behavior these data are compared to that obtained from material that has received 30% reduction during hot working.

Keywords

Fracture Toughness Fatigue Strength Crack Propagation Rate Compact Tension Specimen Extrusion Temperature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wood, R. A., MCIC Report 72–11, Battelle-Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, OH, September 1972.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broadwell, R. G., Coyne, J. E., “The Fracture Toughness-Tensile Property Relationships of Deep Hardenable Titanium Alloys,” AIME Spring Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, May 1970.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chait, R., DeSisto, T. S., “The Fracture Toughness of Three Heavy Section Titanium Alloys,” AMMRC PTR 72–5, Army Materials and Mechanics Research Center, Watertown, MA, October 1972.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ASTM Standard E-399, ASTM Philadelphia, PA 1975, Part 10, 561.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bohanek, E., “Evaluation of Several Commercial Heats of Ti-8Mo8V–2Fe-3A1,” Technical Report No. 45, Titanium Corporation of America, Toronto, OH, August 1970.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chait, R., Metallurgical Transactions 1975, Vol. 6A, 2301.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adair, A. M., Roberson, J. A., Proc. Second Int. Conf. on Strength of Metals and Alloys, A.erican Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, Vol. 1970, 3, 932.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lucas, J. J., Konieczny, P. P. Metallurgical Transactions, 1971, Vol. 2, 911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Acquaviva, S. J., Chait, R., “Monitoring Fatigue Failure of a High Strength Titanium Alloy by Acoustic Emission Techniques,” AMMRC PTR 75–2, Army Materials and Mechanics Research Center, Watertown, MA, June 1975.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Chait
    • 1
  • T. S. DeSisto
    • 1
  1. 1.Army Materials and Mechanics Research CenterWatertownUSA

Personalised recommendations