Many-Body Theory of Molecular Collisions

  • David A. Micha


Fundamental aspects of chemical reactivity have been actively studied in recent years in terms of molecular motions on given potential energy surfaces /1/. These surfaces are obtained after separation of electronic and nuclear motions has been accomplished within the adiabatic approximation. The separation of electronic and nuclear portions of the problem has proved fruitful from the computational point of view, but has prevented a deeper understanding of chemical bonding in a reactive process. The molecular-orbital or valence-bond (VB) methods employed in reactive problems are the same ones used to describe stable chemical species. In this contribution we want to discuss some of the conceptual understanding that may be extracted from a simultaneous treatment of both electronic and nuclear motions in reactive molecular collisions.


Adiabatic Approximation Nuclear Motion Molecular Collision Kinetic Energy Operator Couple Reaction Channel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    See e.g. D.A. Micha, Advan. Chem. Phys, 30, 7 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L.D. Faddeev Sov. Phys. JETP 12 1014 (1961);MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. L.D. Faddeev Sov. Phys. Dokl. 6 384 (1961).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    K.M. Watson and J. Nutall Topics in Several Particle Dynamics (Holden-Day, S. Francisco, 1967 ).Google Scholar
  5. 4a.
    D.A. Micha, J. Chem. Phys. a 2184 (1972);Google Scholar
  6. 4b.
    P. McGuire and D.A. Micha Chem. Phys. Letters 17 207 (1972);Google Scholar
  7. 4c.
    D.A. Micha J. Chem. Phys. 60 2480 (1974);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 4d.
    D.A. Micha and J.-M. Yuan J. Chem. Phys. 63 000 (1975);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 4e.
    J.-M. Yuan and D.A. Micha J. Chem. Phys. 64 (1976).Google Scholar
  10. 5.
    P.O. Löwdin Int. J. Quantum Chem. II, 867 (1968) and previous references therein.Google Scholar
  11. 6.
    B.A. Lippmann and J. Schwinger Phys. Rev. 79 469 (1950).MathSciNetADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 7.
    G.G. Ealint-Kurti and M. Karplus in Orbital Theories of Molecules and Solids ed. N.H. March ( Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1974 ).Google Scholar
  13. 8.
    F.O. Ellison J. A. C. S. 85, 3540 (1963).Google Scholar
  14. 9.
    J.C. Tully J. Chem. Phys. 58 1396 (1973); 59 5122 (1973).Google Scholar
  15. 10.
    follow here an approach by Y. Hahn and K.M. ‘Watson Phys. Rev. A5, 1718 (1972).Google Scholar
  16. 11.
    D.J. Kouri and F.S. Levin Phys. Rev. A10, 1616 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 12.
    A.R. Edmonds Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., 1960 ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • David A. Micha
    • 1
  1. 1.Quantum Theory Project Departments of Chemistry and PhysicsUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations