Abstract
I am combining in this paper the two presentations I gave at the symposium. The first part deals with the problem of instrumentation in the measurement of the pupil.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bellarminow, L. Anwendung der graphischen Methoden bei Unter-suchungen der Pupillenbewegungen: Photograph. Arch, Ges. Physiol., 1885, 19.
Bumke, O. Die Pupillenstoerungen in Geisteskrankheiten, Jena: Fischer Verlag, 1904.
Cueppers, C. Eine neue Methode zur stetigen Registrierung der konsensuellen Pupillenreaktion. Klinische Monatsblatter für Augenheilkunde, 1951, 119, 411.
Dodt, E. and Schrader, K. E. (Eds.) Die Normaleund die Gestoerte Pupillenbewegung. Muenchen: J. F. Bergman Verlag, 1973.
Dustman, R. E. The visual evoked potential in twins. EEG, 1965, 19, 570–575.
Friedman, D., Hakerem, G., Sutton, S. and Fleiss, J. Effect of stimulus uncertainty on the pupillary dilation response and the vertex evoked potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1973, 34, 475–484.
Hakerem, G. The effect of cognitive manipulation on pupillary diameter and evoked cortical potentials. In, E. Dodt and K. E. Schrader (Eds.) Die Normale und die Gestoerte Pupillenbewegung. Muenchen: J. F. Bergman Verlag, 1973.
Hakerem, G. Pupillography. In, P. Venables and I. Martin (Eds.) A Manual of Psychophysiological Methods. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 1967.
Hakerem, G. and Sutton, S. Pupillary response at visual threshold. Nature, 1966, 212, 485–486.
Hess, E. H. Attitude and pupil size. Scientific American, 1965, 212, 46–54.
King, G. An improved electronic pupillograph for clinical use. Proceedings of the National Electronics Conference, 1960, 16.
Levine, S. Pupillary dilation as a function of stimulus uncertainty. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Queens College of CUNY, 1969.
Lewis, E. G., Dustman, R. E. and Sebek, E. Evoked response similarities in monozygotic, dizygotic and unrelated individuals: a comparative study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1972, 23, 309–316.
Lowenstein, O. and Loewenfeld, I. E. Electronic pupillography. Archives of Ophthalmology, 1958, 59, 353–363.
Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J. and John, E. R. Evoked potential correlates to stimulus uncertainty. Science, 1965, 150, 1187–1188.
Tueting, P., Sutton, S. and Zubin, J. Quantitative evoked potential correlates of the probability event. Psychophysiology, 1971, 7, 385–394.
Venables, P. H. and Martin, I. A Manual of Psychophysiological Methods. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 1967.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1974 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hakerem, G. (1974). Conceptual Stimuli, Pupillary Dilation and Evoked Cortical Potentials: A Review of Recent Advances. In: Janisse, M.P. (eds) Pupillary Dynamics and Behavior. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1642-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1642-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1644-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1642-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive