Skip to main content

The Pile-Up Problem in Pulse Fluorometry

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series ((NSSA,volume 69))

Abstract

In this first contribution we consider the single-photon counting experiment. This is followed by a discussion of the Poisson process. The most important function to be described is the zeroth pulse interval density, which corresponds to the experimental result. Only in the limit of a low mean photon count rate (as a ratio to pulse repetition rate), does this function correspond to the required true time-dependence of the fluorescence. In other cases either an electronic pile-up inspector must be used, or the zeroth pulse interval density function itself should be fitted. The distinction between electronics-limited (type E) pileup, and statistical TAC-limited (type S) pile-up is clearly made. Finally, (rather than earlier, where the issues are already confused enough), the nature and variety of dead times are considered in more detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Mandel, Proc.Phys.Soc., 72 1037 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Mandel, Proc.ibid 74 233 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Mandel, Proc. in Progress in Optics, E. Wolf, ed., Volume 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Mandel, E.C.G. Sudarshan and E. Wolf, Proc.Phys.Soc., 84 435 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.L. Kelley and W.H. Kleiner, Phys.Rev., 136A 316 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. Korenman, Phys.Rev., 138B 1012 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.H. Lemberg, Phys.Rev., 167 1152 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Saleh, Photoelectron Statistics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T.P. McLean and E.R. Pike, Phys.Lett., 15 318 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.W. Smith and J.A. Armstrong, Phys.Lett., 19 650 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  11. S.-D. Poisson in Recherches sur la PÌobabilite des Jugements, Paris, 1837.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.A. Fisher, Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 9th Edition, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Bateman, Philos.Mag., 20 698 (1910)

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Bortkiewicz, Die Radioaktive Strahlung als Gegenstand wahrscheinlichkei tstheoretischer Untersuchungen, Springer, Berlin, 1913, p. 75.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Marsden and T. Barratt, Proc.Phys.Soc. (London), 23 367 (1911)

    Google Scholar 

  16. C.M. Harris and B.K. Selinger, Aust.J.Chem., 32 2111 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  17. P.B. Coates, J.Phys.E., 5 148 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Kolin, Ann.Phys.(Leipzig), 21 813 (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. Fürth, Ann.Phys.(Leipzig), 34 575 (1939)

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. De Lotto and D. Dotti, Nucl.Instrum.Methods, 39 281 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  21. F.A. Johnson, R. Jones, T.P. McLean and E.R. Pike, Opt.Acta, 14 35 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  22. S.N. Fedotov and N.G. Volkov, Nucl.Instrum.Methods, 122 463 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  23. S.K. Srinivasan, Phys.Lett.A., 50 277 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. Scheen, Physica (Utrecht) 10 224(1943)

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Ruark and L. Devol, Phys.Rev., 49 355 (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  26. F.A. Johnson, R. Jones, T.P. McLean and E.R. Pike, Phys.Rev Lett. 16 589 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Bedard, Phys.Soc.(London), 90, 131 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  28. B.I. Cantor and M.C. Teich, J.Opt.Soc.Amer., 65 786 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  29. J.W. Muller, Nucl.Instrum.Methods, 112 47 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  30. J.W. Muller, Nucl.Instrum.Methods, 117 401 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  31. M.C. Teich and W.J. McGill, Phys.Rev.Lett. 36 754 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  32. M.C. Teich, L. Matin and B.I. Cantor, J.Opt.Soc.Amer., 68 386 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  33. E. Rutherford and H. Geiger, Philos.Mag., 20 698 (1910)

    Google Scholar 

  34. R.A. Fisher, H.G. Thornton and W.A. Mackenzie, Ann.Appl.Biol. 9 325 (1922)

    Google Scholar 

  35. K.J.W. Craik, Brit.J.Psychol., 38 142 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  36. C.E. Carrick, Honours Thesis in Psychology, Aust.Natl.Univ, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  37. U. Lachmann and B.K. Selinger, unpublished data.

    Google Scholar 

  38. R. Schuyler and I. Isenberg, Rev.Sci.Instrum., 42 813 (1971) Th. Binkert, H.P. Tschanz and P.R. Zinsli, J.Lumin., 5 187 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Selinger, B.K., Harris, C.M. (1983). The Pile-Up Problem in Pulse Fluorometry. In: Cundall, R.B., Dale, R.E. (eds) Time-Resolved Fluorescence Spectroscopy in Biochemistry and Biology. NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series, vol 69. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1634-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1634-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1636-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1634-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics