Pragmatics and Language Differences

  • Eric Esperet

Abstract

Pupils’ linguistic performances are often mentioned to explain academic failure. Moreover, they are supposed to differentiate children according to their social origin. So an attempt has been made for many years to describe these language variations and to analyse the mechanism of their genesis. This topic has formed the subject of several successive formulations, particularly in the field of differential psychology. But the different analyses thus proposed have raised many theoretical and methodological problems. These problems will be examined in the first part of this study, in order to determine which questions have yet to be answered satisfactorily. Then we shall try to specify the form of the pragmatic approach in psycholinguistics, and what this trend brings to the study of language differences: does it allow, for example, the discovery of more responses, or at least the suggestion of more heuristic formulations to an old problem? The third part will deal with several studies conducted by our team, which will illustrate the trend of this paper.

Keywords

Language Acquisition Social Origin Linguistic Form Discourse Processing Language Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J.L., Ramey, C.T., 1980, Structural aspects of maternal speech to infants reared in poverty. Child development, 51, 1280–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anastasi, A., 1958, Differential Psychology. New York, Mc Millan Company.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, J.L., 1962, How to do things with words. Cambridge ( Mass. ), Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ballaire, M.F., 1982, L’événement narratif. Roneoted paper, Laboratoire de Psychologie de Poitiers.Google Scholar
  5. Bates, E., 1976, Language and context: studies in the acquisition of pragmatics. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bates, E., Camaioni, L., Volterra, V., 1979, The acquisition of performatives prior to speech ( 1975 ). Reprinted in E. Ochs and E. Schieffelin, eds., Developmental Pragmatics New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bernstein, B., 1959, A public language: some sociological implications of a linguistic form. Britisch Journal of Sociology 10, 311–326.Google Scholar
  8. Bernstein, B., 1960, Language and social class. Britisch Journal of Sociology 11, 271–276.Google Scholar
  9. Bernstein, B., 1971, Class, codes and control. Vol. 1 London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borduin, C.M., Hengeller, S.W., 1981, Social class, experimental setting and task characteristics as determinants of mother-child interaction. Developmental Psychology, 17, 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.C., 1964, Les héritiers. Paris, Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  12. Bronckart, J.P., Sinclair, H., Papandropoulou, I., 1976, Sémantique et réalité psychologique. Bulletin de Psychologie numéro spécial “La mémoire sémantique”, 225–231.Google Scholar
  13. Bruner, J.S., 1975, The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language 2, 1–19.Google Scholar
  14. Bruner, J.S., 1978, From communication to language: a psychological perspective. In I. Markova, ed., The social context of language. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Bruner, J.S.,1980, Afterword. In D.R. Olson, ed., The social foundations of language. New York, Norton and Cie.Google Scholar
  16. Bruner, J.S., 1981, The pragmatics of acquisition. In W. Deutsch, ed., The child’s construction of language. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Buhler, C., 1931, Kindheit und Jugend. Leipzig, Hirzel.Google Scholar
  18. Cession, A., Kilen, A., Denhiere, G., Rondal, J.A., 1983, “Mamanchrw(133) une histoire”. Roneoted paper. University of Liège and University of Paris.Google Scholar
  19. Carroll, J.B., 1979, Psychometric approaches to the study of language abilities. In C.J. Fillmore, D. Kempler and W.S.Y. Wang, eds., Individual differences in language ability and language behavior. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Cazden, C.B., 1966, Subcultural differences in child language: an interdisciplinary review. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 12, 185–218.Google Scholar
  21. Chauvineau, J., Espéret, E., 1984, Conduite de récit et approche des difficultés en lecture. Colloque international “Perspectives de Réussite”, Bordeaux, 27–29, Février.Google Scholar
  22. Davis, E.A., 1937, The development of linguistic skills in twins, singletons with siblings and only children from age five to ten years. Institute Child Welfare Monograph Service, nr. 14. Minneapolis University, Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dore, J., 1975, Holophrases, speech acts and language universals. Journal of Child Language 2, 21–40.Google Scholar
  24. Dore, J., 1976, Children’s illocutionary acts. in R. Freedle, ed., Discourse relations: comprehension and production. Hillsdale N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Dore, J., 1977, “0h them sheriff”: a pragmatic analysis of children’s responses to questions. In S. Ervin-Tripp and C. Mitchell-Kernan, eds., Child discourse, New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Dore, J., 1978, Conditions for the acquisition of speech acts. In I. Markova, ed., The social context of language, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Ervin-Tripp, S., Mitchell-Kernan, C., 1977., eds., Child discourse, New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Espéret, E., 1979, Langage et origine sociale des élèves. Berne, P. Lang.Google Scholar
  29. Espéret, E., 1980, Intelligence verbale et milieu social. Bulletin de psychologie 32, 475–485.Google Scholar
  30. Espéret, E., Chauvineau, J., 1981, La genèse de la notion d’histoire. Roneoted paper. Laboratoire de psychologie de Poitiers.Google Scholar
  31. Espéret, E., 1982a, Variations des conduites langagières: codes ou codages différents? Bulletin de la S.F.E.C.A., n° 2, 339–351, Actes du Colloque “Variabilité interindividuelle et plasticité du comportement”.Google Scholar
  32. Espéret, E., 1982b, Langage et école: renouvellement nécessaire de la problématique classique. Comptes-rendus des IVemes Journées de Psychologie Différentielle, Université de Lyon I I.Google Scholar
  33. Espéret, E., 1984, Processus de production: genèse et rôle du schéma narratif dans la conduite de récit. In M. Moscato and G. Pieraut Le Bonniec, eds., Ontogénèse des processus psycholinguistiques et leur actualisation, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  34. Espéret, E., Chauvineau, J., 1984, Conscious narrative schema in text comprehension and recall: a differential approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development in press.Google Scholar
  35. Espéret, E., Gaonac’h, D., 1983, What does storytelling mean for children: narrative schema representation and storytelling at different ages. In S.R. Mathews II, ed., Supplementary Proceedings of the International Symposium on Text Processing, E.R.D.C., University of West Florida.Google Scholar
  36. Farran, D.C., Haskins, R., 1980, Reciprocal influence in the social interactions of mothers and three-years-old children from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Child development, 51 780–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Feagans, L., 1982, The development and importance of narratives for school adaptation. In L. Feagans and D.C. Farran, eds., The language of children reared in poverty. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Fielding, R., Fraser, C., 1978, Language and interpersonal relations. In I. Markova, ed., The social context of language. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Flavell, J.H., 1981, Cognitive monitoring. In W.P. Dickson, ed., Children’s oral communication skills. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Freedle, R., Duran, R.P., 1979, Sociolinguistic approaches to dialogue with suggested applications to cognitive science. In R. Freedle, Ed., New directions in discourse processing. Norwood, Ablex Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  41. Freedle, R., Fine, J., 1982, Prose comprehension in natural and experimental settings: the theory and its practical implications. In S. Rosenberg, ed., Handbook of applied psycho-linguistics. Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  42. Gaonac’h, D., Espéret, E., 1984, Fonction des temps verbaux dans la production de récits libres. Evolution génétique entreGoogle Scholar
  43. 4.
    et 8 ans. To appear in J. Wittwer, ed., La psycholinguistique textuelle. No spécial. Bulletin de Psychologie. Google Scholar
  44. Giles, H., Smith, P.M., Robinson, W.P., 1980, Language: Social psychological perspectives. Oxford, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  45. Gullo, D.F., 1981, Social class differences in preschool children’s comprehension of Wh-questions. Child Development, 52, 736740.Google Scholar
  46. Gumperz, J.J., 1962, Types of linguistic communities. Anthropological Linguistics, 4, 28–40.Google Scholar
  47. Halliday, M.A.K., 1973, Explorations in the functions of language. London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  48. Halliday, M.A.K., 1975, Learning how to mean. London, Edward Arnold. Halliday, M.A.K., 1978, Language as social semiotics. London, Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  49. Heider, E.R., 1971, Style and accuracy of verbal communications within and between social classes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18, 33–47.Google Scholar
  50. Hunt, E., Lunneborg, C., Lewis, J., 1975, What does it mean to be high verbal? Cognitive Psychology, 7, 194–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hymes, D., 1964, Toward ethnographies of communication. American Anthropologist, 66, 12–25.Google Scholar
  52. Kail, M., 1978, La compréhension des présuppositions ches l’enfant. Année Psychologique, 78, 425–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Karmiloff-Smith, A., 1979, A functional approach to child language, Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  54. Labov, W., 1966, The social stratification of speech in New York City. Washington, Center for applied linguistics.Google Scholar
  55. Labov, W., 1976, Sociolinguistique. Paris Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  56. Labov, W., Waletzky, J., 1966, Narrative analysis. Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm, ed., Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle, Univ. of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  57. Lieven, E.V.M, 1978, Conversations between mothers and young children: individual differences and their possible implications forGoogle Scholar
  58. the study of language learning. In N. Waterson and C. Snow, eds., The development of communication. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
  59. Markman, E.M., 1981, Comprehension monitoring. In W.P. Dickson, ed., Children’s oral communication skills. New York, Academic press.Google Scholar
  60. Markova, I., 1978, The social context of language. New York, Wiley. Introduction.Google Scholar
  61. Martlew, M., 1980, Mother’s control strategies in dyadic mother-child conversations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 9, 327–347.Google Scholar
  62. Mc Carthy, D., 1952, Le développement du langage. In L. Carmichael, Ed., Manuel de Psychologie de l’enfant. Paris, PUF, Tome II (Translation).Google Scholar
  63. Moerk, E.L., 1984, A differential interactive analysis of language teaching and learning. To appear in Discourse Processing.Google Scholar
  64. Nelson, K., 1973, Structure and stategy in learning to talk. Mono-graphs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38, n° 149.Google Scholar
  65. Nelson, K., 1981, Individual differences in language development: implications for development and language. Developmental Psychology, 17, 170–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ninio, A., 1980, Picture book reading in mother-infant dyads belonging to two subgroups in Israèl. Child Development, 51, 587–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Noble, C.E., 1961, Verbal learning and individual differences. In C.N. Cofer, ed., Verbal learning and verbal behavior. New York, Mc Graw Hill.Google Scholar
  68. Ochs, E., 1979, Social foundations of language. In R. Freedle, ed., New directions in discourse processing. Noorwood, Ablex Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  69. Ochs, E., Schieffelin, B. eds., 1979, Developmental pragmatics. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  70. Rumelhart, D.F., 1975, Note on a schema for stories. In D. Bobrow and A. Collins, eds., Representation and understanding. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  71. Searle, J., 1969, Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. London, Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Searle, J., 1975, Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan, eds., Syntax and semantics. Vol III. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  73. Simmons, B., 1976, A linguistic analysis of disadvantaged kindergarten children’s verbal responses to questions. Journal of Educational Research 69, 253–255.Google Scholar
  74. Sinclair, J.M., Coulthard, R.M., 1975, Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  75. Smith, M.E., 1935, A study of some factors influencing the development of the sentence in the preschool children. Journal of Genetic Psychology 46, 182–212.Google Scholar
  76. Snow, C.E., Ferguson, C., eds., 1977, Talking to children. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  77. Stubbs, M., Delamont, S., 1976, Explorations in class-room observation. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
  78. Tough, J., 1974, Children’s use of language. Educational Review, 26, 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Van Dijk, T.A., 1980a, The semantics and pragmatics of functional coherence in discourse. In J. Boyd and A. Ferrara, eds., Speech acts: ten years after. Bologne, Bompiani.Google Scholar
  80. Van Dijk, T.A., 1980b, Macrostructures. Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  81. Van Dijk, T.A., 1982, Attitudes et compréhension de textes. Bulletin de psychologie 35, n° Spécial “Langage et compréhension”, 557–569.Google Scholar
  82. Wells, G., 1980, Adjustements in adult-child conversations; some effects of interaction. In H. Giles, W.P. Robinson and P.M. Smith, eds., Language social psychological perspectives. Oxford, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  83. Wells, G., Robinson, W.P., 1982, The role of adult speech in language development. In C. Fraser and K.R. Scherer, eds., Advances in the social psychology of language. Cambridge and Paris, Cambridge Univ. Press and Ed. M.S.H., 1982.Google Scholar
  84. Young, G.M., 1982, The elaborated code: a new formulation within a functional framework. Language and Speech, 25, 81–93.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Esperet
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Psychologie E.R.A. CNRS 797Université de PoitiersFrance

Personalised recommendations