Advertisement

Production of New Particles in Electron-Positron Annihilation

  • Frederick J. Gilman
Part of the Studies in the Natural Sciences book series (SNS, volume 12)

Abstract

At last year’s conference in this series, I recall speaking1 in a session on “Psychotherapy and Neuroses.” But at that time, with charmed particles still to be directly observed and with a number of important puzzles to be solved, in many ways I felt like someone presenting problems rather than cures. With the experimental progress in the year since then, the present discussion should be much more reassuring.

Keywords

Production Cross Section Brookhaven National Laboratory Branching Ratio Momentum Spectrum Semileptonic Decay 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F. J. Gilman, in New Pathways in High Energy Physics II, ed. Arnold Perlmutter ( Plenum Press, New York, 1976 ), p. 1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1285 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    See, for example, M. K. Gaillard, B. W. Lee, and J. L. Rosner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 277 (1975) and J. Rosner, invited talk at this conference, and references to other work therein.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. J. Gilman, invited talk at the 1976 Meeting of the Division of Particles and Fields of the APS, Brookhaven National Laboratory, 6–8 Oct 1976, and SLAC-PUB-1833 (1976), unpublished.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    See, for example, G. Abrams, in Proc. 1975 Int. Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energies, Stanford University, 21–27 AuF 1975, ed. W. T. Kirk ( SLAC, Stanford, California, 1975 ), p. 25.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    We use K* to denote the vector resonance at - 890 MeV and K** to denote the tensor resonance at - 1420 MeV.Google Scholar
  7. H. Harari, Stanford Linear Accelerator Report No. SLAC-PUB-1514 (1974). F. J. Gilman, in AIP Conference Proceedings, No. 26, High Energy Physics and Nuclear Structure - 1975, Los Alamos, 9–13 June 1975, ed. D.E. Nagle, R. L. Burman, B. G. Storms, A. S. Goldhaber, and C. K. Hargrave (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1975), p. 331. V. Gupta and R. Kogerler, Phys. Lett. 56B, 473 (1975).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Vannucci et a., SLAC-PUB-1862 (1976), unpublished.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Trilling, talk at the Topical Conference of the SLAC Summer Institute on Particle Physics, Stanford University, 2–13 Aug 1976 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. Braunschweig et al., Phys. Lett. 63B, 487 (1976); W. Bartel et al., Phys. Lett. 64B, 483 (1976).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. P. Samios, M. Goldberg, and B. T. Meadows, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 49 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Okubo, Phys. Lett. 5, 165 (1963); G. Zweig, CERN preprints TH401 and TH412 (1964), unpublished; J. Iizuka, Suppl. Prog. Theor. Phys. 37–38, 21 (1966).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Branching ratios for the IP,1P’, and other charmonium states are taken from the compilation of G. J. Feldman, lectures at the SLAC Summer Institute on Particle Physics, 2–13 Aug 1976, and SLAC-PUB-1851 (1976), unpublished, unless otherwise indicated.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Coyne, talk at the American Physical Society Meeting at Stanford, California, 20–22 Dec 1976, on the results of the Maryland-Princeton-PaduaStanford-SLAC-San Diego experiment at SPEAR, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 21, 1294 (1976).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. S. Whitaker, W. Tanenbaum et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1596 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. W. Simpson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 699 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    We use BRfrom Refs. 14 and 15 and the branching ratios for hadrons reported in Ref. 9 and J. S. Whitaker, University of California Ph.D. Thesis and LBL preprint LBL-5518 (1976), unpublished.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Goldhaber, F. M. Pierre et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 255 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. F. Schwitters, invited talk at the 1976 Meeting of the Division of Particles and Fields of the APS, Brookhaven National Laboratory, 6–8 Oct 1976, and SLAC-PUB-1871 (1976), unpublished.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. Knapp, invited talk at the 1976 Meeting of the Division of Particles and Fields of the APS, Brookhaven National Laboratory, 6–8 Oct 1976 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    I. Peruzzi, M. Piccolo, G. J. Feldman, H. K. Nguyen, J. E. Wiss et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 569 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Breidenbach, talk at the American Physical Society Meeting, Stanford, California, 20–22 Dec 1976, on results from the SLAC-LBL Magnetic Dectector Collaboration at SPEAR, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 21, 1283 (1976).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. Braunschweig et al., Phys. Lett. 63B, 471 (1976).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Burmester et al., Phys. Lett. 64B, 369 (1976).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. Criegee, talk at the American Physical Society Meeting, Stanford, California, 20–22 Dec 1976, on recent results from DORIS, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 21, 1283 (1976).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    H. Meyer, invited talk at this conference.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    G. J. Feldman, F. Bulos, D. Lüke et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 117 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Similar estimates based on the muon tower data were first made by G. J. Feldman, whom I thank for discussions. We take only the data with 3 charged prongs observed to make this estimate of semimuonic charm decays, since the corresponding two prong events likely arise dominantly from the decay of a charged heavy lepton. See Section IV of this talk.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    See C. Baltay, H. Bingham, D. Cline, and O. Fackler, invited talks at the 1976 Meeting of the Division of Particles and Fields of the APS, Brookhaven National Laboratory, 6–8 Oct 1976 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    F. J. Gilman, unpublished.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Some of the special low spin cases have also been considered by J. D. Jackson (unpublished).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    G. J. Feldman, invited talk at the Irvine Conference, December 1975 (unpublished). H. Meyer (Ref. 26) reports an inclusive tli production cross section in the 4 GeV region which is a few tenths of a percent of the total cross section.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Bander et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 695 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. C. Rosenzweig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 697 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Y. Iwasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 54, 492 (1975).Google Scholar
  36. 34.
    L. B. Okun and M. B. Voloshin, JETP Lett. 23, 333 (1976).Google Scholar
  37. 35.
    A De Rújula, H. Georgi, and S. L. Glashow, Harvard preprint HUTP-76/A176 (1976), unpublished; S. Nussinov and D. P. Sidhu, Fermilab preprint FERMILAB-Pub-76/70-THY (1976), unpublished; P. H. Cox, S. Y. Park, and A. Yildiz, Harvard preprint HUTP-76/A182 (1976), unpublished.Google Scholar
  38. 36.
    A. De Rújula, H. Georgi, and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 398 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. K. Lane and E. Eichten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 477 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 37.
    We assume that the muon and the other charged prong don’t both come from the U(or U).Google Scholar
  41. 38.
    If there are several new hadrons, then we are computing an average (weighted by relative production cross section) branching ratio, assuming the sum of their inclusive production cross sections is Qpoint’Google Scholar
  42. 39.
    See, for example, A. Ali and T. C. Yang, DESY preprint DESY 76/39 (1976), unpublished; V. Barger, T. Gottshalk, and R. J. N. Phillips, University of Wisconsin preprint C00–881–569 (1976); unpublished; M. Gronau et al., DESY preprint DESY 76/62 (1976), unpublished.Google Scholar
  43. 40.
    Note that the previous rough calculation of BR is in fact an estimate of BR(U vp vu) in the case U is a charged heavy lepton and it decays dominatly into one charged prong plus neutrals. The shape and magnitude of the inclusive muon spectrum of Ref. 27 agree with the heavy lepton hypothesis.Google Scholar
  44. 41.
    M. L. Perl et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1489 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 42.
    M. L. Perl, G. J. Feldman et al., Phys. Lett. 63B, 466 (1976).Google Scholar
  46. 43.
    See G. J. Feldman, lecture at the SLAC Summer Institute on Particle Physics, Stanford University, 2–13 Aug 1976, and SLAC-PUB-1852 (1976), unpublished.Google Scholar
  47. 44.
    See also H. Meyer, Ref. 26, for evidence from the PLUTO detector at DESY for U + one charged prong and u e events in the 4 GeV region at rates consistent with the cross sections measured at SPEAR (Refs. 41, 42, and 27).Google Scholar
  48. 45.
    M. L. Perl, invited talk at the International Neutrino Conference 1976, Aachen, Germany, 8–12 June 1976, and -SLAC-PUB-1764 (1976), unpublished.Google Scholar
  49. 46.
    G. Goldhaber, talk at the Topical Conference of the SLAC Summer Institute on Particle Physics, Stanford University, 2–13 Aug 1976, and LBL preprint LBL-5534 (1976), unpublished.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederick J. Gilman
    • 1
  1. 1.Stanford Linear Accelerator CenterStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations