Superconducting Magnets—Applications to the Mössbauer Effect

  • Paul P. Craig


The possibility of utilizing superconductivity—the vanishing of electrical resistance which occurs in many metals at sufficiently low temperatures—to produce magnetic fields was realized by Kamerlingh Onnes shortly after his initial discovery of the phenomenon in 1911, Until recent times all such efforts were defeated by the inability of superconducting materials to carry high currents in the presence of large magnetic fields. It was not until about 1957 that G. Yntema built the first practical superconducting solenoid by wrapping niobium wire around an iron core to produce a field of 8 kOe, and it is only in the last three years that superconducting magnets have been developed to a stage such that for many purposes they excel conventional magnets. The new era in superconducting technology [1,2] resulted from the discovery by B. Matthias of high-field Nb—Zr alloys and the intermetallic compound Nb3Sn [3].


Temperature Control System Nuclear Magnetic Moment Large Magnetic Field Split Pair Mossbauer Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Superconductors, edited by M. Tanenbaum and W. V. Wright (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1962 ).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Conference on the Science of Superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36 (1): part 1 (1964).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. T. Matthias, in: Progress in LowTemperature Physics, Vol. II, edited by C. J. Gorter (North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1957 ).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. P. Craig, D. E. Nagle, W. A. Steyert, and R. D. Taylor, Phys. Rev. Letters 9: 12 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. A. Kitchens, W. A. Steyert, and R. D. Taylor, Phys. Rev. 138: A467 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. deWaard and J. Heberle, Phys. Rev. 136: B1615 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Heberle, M. Schulhof, and S. S. Hanna, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36: 407 (1964).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. P. Craig, R. C. Perisho, R. Segnan, and W. A. Steyert, Phys. Rev. 138:A 1460 (1965).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. S. Hanna, J. Heberle, J. Diaz, andR. W. Reno, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36: 407 (1964).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. P. Craig and W. A. Steyert, Phys. Rev. Letters 13: 802 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. B. Sampson and P. G. Kruger, Rev. Sci. Instr. 36 (No. 8) (1965).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Heberle, Rev. Sci. Instr. 33: 1476 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. D. Taylor, W. A. Steyert, and A. G. Fox, Rev. Sci. Instr. (to be published).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. L. Powell, M.D. Bunch, and R. J. Corruccini, Cryogenics 1 (3): (1961).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. G. Dash and J. Siegwarth, Rev. Sci. Instr. 34: 1276 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1965

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul P. Craig
    • 1
  1. 1.Brookhaven National LaboratoryUptonUSA

Personalised recommendations