Skip to main content

Abstract

It is important to recognize that the new drug development process, which begins with the identification of a potential therapeutic compound, continues well into the post-marketing period. The responsibility of regulators, scientists, physicians, and the pharmaceutical industry to pursue knowledge about drug safety and efficacy extends well beyond the time when sufficient information is available to suggest that a drug is safe and efficacious, and warrants marketing. The ultimate uses of newly marketed medications and the clinical milieu into which it will be interposed is extremely dynamic and complex. It is during the early marketing period that a number of drugs approved for marketing were discovered to have serious, unanticipated adverse events requiring at best a change in labeling; and at worst removal from the market at great cost, in terms of credibility and dollars, to both FDA and the pharmaceutical industry (FDA Drug Review, 1990).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antal, E. J., T. H. Grasela, and R. B. Smith (1989). An evaluation of population pharmacokinetics in therapeutic trials Part III. Prospective data collection versus retrospective data assembly. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 46, 552–559.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antal, E. J., D. A. Pyne, K. E. Starz, and R. B. Smith (1988). Probability models in pharmacodynamic analysis of clinical trials. In P. Kroboth and R. B. Smith (Eds.), Current Problem and Potential Solutions. Vol. 2. Harvey Whitney Books, Cincinnati. pp. 220–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, S. L., and L. B. Sheiner (1982). Estimating population kinetics. CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Engineering 8, 195–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, S. L., and L. B. Sheiner (Eds.), (1983). NONMEM Users Guide - Part VI: PREDPP Guide. NONMEM Project Group, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA Drug Review (1990). Post-approval risks 1976–85. United States General Accounting Office, Report to the Chairman, subcommittee on Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations, Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives. PEMD–90–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasela, T. H., and M. W. Dreis (1992). An evaluation of the quinolone-theophylline interaction using the FDA Spontaneous Reporting System. Arch. Intern. Med., 152 617–621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holford, N. H. G., and L. B. Sheiner (1981). Understanding the dose-effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 6 429–453.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D. W., and S. Lemeshow (Eds.), (1989). Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley and Sons. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. T. (1980). Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis. Lifetime Learning Publication, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludden, T. M. (1988). Population pharmacokinetics. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 28, 1059–1063.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacMahon, B., and T. F. Pugh (Eds.), (1970), Epidemiology Principles and Methods Little, Brown and Company, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, C. C., and J. H. Rodman (1986). Analysis of clinical pharmacokinetic data for individualizing drug dosage regimens. In W. E. Evans, J. J. Schentag, and W. J. Jusko (Eds.), Applied Pharmacokinetics 2nd edition, Applied Therapeutics, Inc., Spokane, WA, pp. 55–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner, L. B., and S. L. Beal (1983). Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. III. Monoexponential model: Routine clinical pharmacokinetic data. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 3, 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheiner, L. B., and L. Z. Benet (1985). Premarketing observational studies of population phannacokinetics of new drugs. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 38, 481–487.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strom, B. L. (Ed.), (1989). Pharrnacoepidemiology. Churchill Livingstone, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grasela, T.H., Antal, E.J. (1993). Pharmacoepidemiology, Population Pharmacokinetics and New Drug Development. In: Yacobi, A., Skelly, J.P., Shah, V.P., Benet, L.Z. (eds) Integration of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Toxicokinetics in Rational Drug Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1520-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1520-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1522-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1520-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics