Classification of Operators in Atomic Spectroscopy by Lie Groups

  • B. R. Judd


The use of Lie groups in atomic spectroscopy dates from the 1949 article of Racah.1 It was shown there that the Coulomb interaction between f electrons could be described as a linear combination of four operators ei (i = 0, 1, 2, 3) whose descriptions in terms of the irreps W and U of SO(7) and G2 are (000)(00) for i = 0 and 1, (400)(40) for i = 2, and (220)(22) for i = 3. Highest weights are used to define W and U, and we should also note that Racah used an acute-angled pair of axes for the two numbers (ulu2) defining U, rather than the obtuse-angled scheme sometimes preferred today.2 For the atomic d shell, only three operators of the type ei are required to represent the Coulomb interaction: two of them correspond to the SO(5) scalar irrep (00), the third to the irrep (22) of that group. At the time of Racah’s article on the f shell, all d-electron matrix elements of the Coulomb interaction had already been expressed as linear combinations of the Slater integrals Fk involving the radial parts of the eigenfunctions, so there was little incentive to rework the calculation for the d shell. Shortly after the appearance of Racah’s article, the effects of configuration interaction on the configurations dN and dNs began to be studied, but they were analyzed by traditional methods. The effects of two-electron excitations were shown by Trees3 and Racah4 to be reproducible by changes in the Fk together with just two new effective operators, L2 and Q, in the limit where second-order perturbation theory is adequate. The eigenvalues of L2 are L(L + 1); those of Q are zero for all terms 2S+1L of d2 except for 1S. It is not difficult to show that L2 transforms like a mixture of the irreps (00) and (22) of SO(5), while Q belongs to (00) alone.


Coulomb Interaction Azimuthal Quantum Number Orthogonal Operator Slater Integral Multiplicity Label 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. Racah, Theory of complex spectra. IV, Phys. Rev., 76: 1352 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. G. McKay and J. Patera, “Tables of Dimensions, Indices, and Branching Rules for Representations of Simple Lie Algebras,” Marcel Dekker, New York (1981).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. E. Trees, The L(L + 1) correction to the Slater formulas for the energy levels, Phys. Rev., 85: 382 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Racah, L(L + 1) correction in the spectra of the iron group, Phys. Rev., 85: 381 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. P. Elliott, B. R. Judd, and W. A. Runciman, Energy levels in rare-earth ions, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A240: 509 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. G. McLellan, Selection rules for spin-orbit matrix elements for the configuration fn, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London), 76:419 (1960).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Feneuille, Opérateurs à trois particules pour les électrons d équivalents, C. R. Acad. Sc. (Paris), B 262: 23 (1966).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. R. Judd, Three-particle operators for equivalent electrons, Phys. Rev., 141: 4 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. R. Judd, Zeeman effect as a prototype for intra-atomic interactions, Physica, 33: 174 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. R. Judd, Operator averages and orthogonalities, in “Group Theoretical Methods in Physics” (Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 201), G. Denardo, G. Ghirardi, and T. Weber, eds., Springer, Berlin (1984).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. J. Newman, Operator orthogonality and parameter uncertainty, Phys. Lett., 92A: 167 (1982).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. R. Judd and M. A. Suskin, Complete set of orthogonal scalar operators for the configuration f3, J. Opt. Soc. Am., B1: 261 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. R. Judd and R. C. Leavitt, Many-electron orthogonal scalar operators in atomic shell theory, J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Phys. 19:in press, (1986).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Dothe, J. E. Hansen, B. R. Judd, and G. M. S. Lister, Orthogonal operators for pNd and pdN, J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Phys., 18: 1061 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. E. Hansen, B. R. Judd, G. M. S. Lister, and W. Persson, Observation of four-body effects in atomic spectra, J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Phys., 18: L725 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. R. Judd and H. Crosswhite, Orthogonalized operators for the f shell, J. Opt. Soc. Am., B1: 255 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. E. Hansen and B. R. Judd, Fine-structure analyses with orthogonal operators, J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Phys., 18: 2327 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. E. Hansen and B. R. Judd, New effective parameters for atomic structure, Comments Atom. Mol. Phys. in press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. O. Ekberg, Term analysis of Fe VI, Phys. Scr., 11: 23 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. R. Judd
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics & AstronomyThe Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations