Smoothing and Ill-Posed Problems

  • G. Wahba
Part of the Mathematical Concepts and Methods in Science and Engineering book series (MCSENG, volume 18)


The method of weighted cross-validation is applied to the problem of solving linear integral equations of the first kind with noisy data. Numerical results illustrating its efficacy are given for estimating derivatives and for solving Fujita’s equation.


Ridge Regression Reproduce Kernel Hilbert Space Subset Selection Linear Integral Equation Principal Component Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gehatia, M., and Wife, D. R., Solution of Fujita’s Equation for Equilibrium Sedimentation by Applying Tikhonov’s Regularizing Functions, Journal of Polymer Science Series A2, Vol. 8, pp. 2039–2050, 1970.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wahba, G., Practical Approximate Solutions to Linear Operator Equations when the Data Are Noisy, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Journal on Numerical Analysis, Vol. 14, pp. 651–667, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mallows, C. L., Some Comments on Cp, Technometrics, Vol. 15, pp. 661675, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hudson, H. M., Empirical Bayes Estimation, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Technical Report No. 58, 1974.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Craven, P., and Wahba, G., Smoothing Noisy Data with Spline Functions: Estimating the Correct Degree of Smoothing by the Method of Generalized Cross-Validation, Numerische Mathematik, Vol. 31, pp. 377–403, 1979. Report No. 445, 1977.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Golub, G., Heath, M., and Wahba, G., Generalized Cross-Validation as a Method for Choosing a Good Ridge Parameter, Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Technical Report No. 491, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Allen, D. M., Mean Square Error of Prediction as a Criterion for Selecting Variables, Technometrics, Vol. 13, pp. 469–475, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Allen, D. M., The Relationship Between Variable Selection and Data Augmentation and a Method for Prediction, Technometrics, Vol. 16, pp. 125–127, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stone, M., Cross-Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Prediction, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Vol. 36, pp. 111–147, 1974.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wahba, G., and Wold, S., A Completely Automatic French Curve: Fitting Spline Functions by Cross-Validation, Communications in Statistics, Vol. 4, pp. 1–17, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reinisch, C. M., Smoothing by Spline Functions, Numerische Mathematik, Vol. 10, pp. 177–183, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Varah, J. E., A Practical Examination of Numerical Methods for Linear Discrete Ill-Posed Problems, Department of Computer Sciences, University of British Columbia, Technical Report No. 76–08, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Wahba
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations