Skip to main content

Workshop Summary: Animal Tumor Models for Evaluating Chemically Defined Immunomodulators

  • Chapter
Biological Response Modifiers in Human Oncology and Immunology

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 166))

Abstract

Efforts to establish an immunopharmacology for cancer immunotherapy have been frustrated by the lack of animal tumor models which directly relate to human cancer. Initially, emphasis was placed on transplantable tumors which were often inadvertently immunogenic by nature of infection with murine viruses or were of nonsyngeneic origins. The easily demonstrated effectiveness of BCG, C. parvum and high molecular weight polysaccharide preparations led to the erroneous conclusion that such therapy in man would be equally effective. Considerable clinical trials since have not generally supported this conclusion. The relative failure of these agents in the human can be attributed to a number of factors including the inadequacy of the models. Complexity and ambivalence of their actions in humans have played a major role. The evolution of immunotherapy in human cancer has increasingly moved away from the complex agents towards the use of biologicals and chemically defined agents. It is clear that seldom are the agents effective in cancer therapy when used as a monotherapy. The apparent rule, both in murine tumor systems and in human cancer trials, has emerged that these agents act to increase the number of individuals remaining in remission following effective cytoreductive therapy with chemotherapy, surgery or irradiation. They have not been particularly active in treating progressive disease. Levamisole offers a case in point. In 34 animal tumor models in which it was used as a monotherapy no effect was observed; however, following cytoreductive therapy it was active in 13 of 21 systems. The experience in human cancer generally parallels these results. If one accepts the contention that levamisole is the only agent whose animal experience correlates with the human then logically the models in which it has been effective are the most appropriate for considering related agents. One of th difficulties in this consideration is that very little is known about the detailed antitumor mechanisms of the action of levamisole in either the animal models or in human cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hadden, J.W., Spreafico, F. (1983). Workshop Summary: Animal Tumor Models for Evaluating Chemically Defined Immunomodulators. In: Klein, T., Specter, S., Friedman, H., Szentivanyi, A. (eds) Biological Response Modifiers in Human Oncology and Immunology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 166. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1410-4_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1410-4_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-1412-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-1410-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics