An Analysis of Some Factors that Influence Wet Skid Resistance

  • B. D. Gujrati
  • K. C. Ludema

Abstract

An analysis is given which is expected to serve as the basis for the calculation of the skid resistance of tires on wet roads. The analysis is for a single sphere, sliding and rolling on water covered rubber. The sphere is taken to be a single scaled up protruberance in the road surface texture. Ignoring interaction effects each protruberance is seen to contribute to a total drag force on a sliding tire.

The analysis uses equations of elastohydrodynamics modified to accommodate the viscoelastic properties of rubber. The properties of the rubber are obtained from an identation test. The analysis correlates well with experiments using water on rubber except at low sliding speed. Experiments using fluids that wet rubber better than water does show good correlation over the entire sliding speed of the experiments. The conclusion is then reached that the skid resistance of tires at low speeds is strongly influenced by the poor wettability of water to rubber.

Keywords

Viscous Drag Fluid Film Tire Rubber Contact Pressure Distribution Rubber Chemistry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K. C. Ludema and B. D. Gujrati, “An Analysis of the Literature on Tire-Road Skid Resistance,” American Society for Testing and Materials, STP No. 541, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. 2.(a)
    E. N. Bevilacqua and E. P. Percarpio, “Lubricated Friction of Rubber,” Rubber Chemistry and Technology, Vol 41, 1968, p. 832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (b).
    B. E. Sabey and G. N. Lupton, “Friction on Wet Surfaces of Tire-Tread Vulcanizates,” Rubber Chemistry and Technology, Vol 32, p. 878, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    B. D. Gujrati, Ph.D. Thesis at The University of Michigan, 1974. (Unpublished).Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    C. J. Hooke and O’Donoghue, “Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Soft, Highly Deformed Contacts,” The Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol 14, p. 34, 1972.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    J. F. Archard and E. W. Cowking, “Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication at Point Contacts,” Proceedings, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 180, Pt. 3B, p. 47, 1965-66.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    V. E. Gough and D. W. Badger, “Tyres and Road Safety,” World Highways, Vol 17, p. 47, 1966.Google Scholar
  8. 7.(a)
    W. F. Kern, “Coefficient of Wet Friction of Tire Treads,” Rubber Chemistry and Technology, Vol 40, p. 982, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (b).
    H. W. Kummer, “Lubricated Friction of Rubber: Discussion,” Rubber Chemistry and Technology, Vol 41, p. 895, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 8.
    E. Clamroth and W. Heidemann, “Measurement of Rolling and Sliding Friction Coefficients of Tread Compounds,” Rubber Chemistry and Technology, Vol 41, 1968, p. 908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. D. Gujrati
    • 1
  • K. C. Ludema
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations