A Comparative Study of the Lateral Work Activities of Three Production Managers in the UK Manufacturing Industry and the Implications for Training Production Managers

  • B. Trought
  • P. C. T. Willey


This paper reports a practical study which compares the work activities of three production managers in the lateral, organizational dimension — the dimension in which product-flow occurs. (It also draws on observations of 18 other managers in manufacturing environments.) Each manager was employed by a manufacturing company in the private sector, but otherwise the three companies are unconnected. The companies however had many structural aspects of similarity and were all currently successful in a highly competitive environment.

Our data was collected in 1983 by observation and structured recording, together with interviews and perusal of company papers. We report here only part of a much larger study of managerial activity which we carried out recently.

We explain how production managers interact with their peers to help keep the product flowing. They may have far less impact on this product-flow than may be expected. We indicate features of successful production managers’ work activities which, we believe, help to sustain success.

Our findings contrast with some of the American literature on managerial activity and call into question many of the general, prescriptive statements of managerial science, particularly those set out in managerial textbooks.

Our research shows that the work activity of production managers, at its most effective, is mainly unplanned, spontaneous and reactive to situations and incidents, whilst decisions are rarely arrived at by obviously rational means. Statistical testing of our data shows that managerial activity varies widely between the companies for what are ostensibly similar jobs. Hence it seems that to prescribe generally how a manager ought to manage is inappropriate. As a result, specifying a course of training for production management may be a more intransigent problem than it first appears. Nevertheless, tentative recommendations are made about both of these problems.


Work Activity Manufacture Technology Production Manager Lateral Contact Rational Discrimination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Trought B & Willey P C T (1977) Lateral relationships in manufacturing organizations. Workshop on Organizational Behaviour, Management of Temporary and Informal Systems, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Purycard, Aix-en-Provence, May.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Trought B & Willey P C T (1982) The need to include cooperation in studies of organizational behaviour. 10th Anniversary Conference of the European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Leuven, Belgium, May.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Trought B & Willey P C T (1984) Patterns of lateral relationships between managers in manufacturing companies. Conference on New Challenges for Management Research, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Leuven, Belgium, May.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Trought B (1984) An Analysis of Lateral Relations in Manufacturing Management and of their Contribution to Product Flow, unpublished PhD thesis offered to the University of Nottingham, October.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Blau PM & Scott W R (1963) Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Carlson S (1951) Executive Behaviour: A Study of the Workload and the Working Methods of Managing Directors, Strömberg, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Stewart R (1967) Managers and their Jobs: A Study of the Similarities and Differences in the Ways Managers Spend their Time, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Stewart R (1976) Contrasts in Management: A Study of the Different Types of Managers’ Jobs: Their Demands and Choices, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Mintzberg H (1973) The Nature of Managerial Work Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Stewart R (1982) Managerial behaviour: how research has changed the traditional picture. 10th Anniversary Conference of the European Institute of Advanced Studies in, Management, Leuven, Belgium, May.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Kotter J P (1982) The General Managers, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Nutt P C (1984) Types of organizational decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, September, pp414-450.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Johnson R A, Newell W T & Vergin R C (1974) Production and Operations Management: A Systems Concept, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, USA.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Fayol H (1949) General and Industrial Management, Pitman, London (English translation but first published in France in 1916).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Evans D (1981) Supervisory Management, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, London.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Stewart R (1982) Choices for the Manager, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Trought
    • 1
  • P. C. T. Willey
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations