A Methodology for Forming Group Technology Cells in Advanced Manufacturing Systems

  • S. K. Banerjee
  • R. K. Maji


Advanced processing technologies are being increasingly used in manufacturing system design to provide the required flexibility needed to cope with customer demand in a competitive market environment. The resulting wide and diverse processing capabilities tend to cause excessive exceptional parts when traditional group technology cell formation methods are applied. These parts require inter-cell flows or expensive investment in duplicated equipment with unacceptable utilization and cost. This paper describes a modified procedure that may eliminate these constraints. It is an interactive method which uses a computerized cluster analysis package (CLUSTAN 2.1) to form similar part families by analysing their physical and technological characteristics. Machines are then assigned to each of these groups and at subsequent stages inter-cell transfer of parts and machines is carried out until satisfactory cells are formed. Management decision options can be used in this procedure for a more general application.


Similarity Coefficient Flexible Manufacturing System Computer Numerical Control Machine Exceptional Element Manufacture System Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Opitz H (1970) A Classification System to Describe Workpieces, Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Burbridge J L (1971) Production flow analysis. Production Engineer, 50, No. 4/5, p 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    El-Esswy I G K & Torrance J (1972) Component flow analysis — an effective approach to production system’s design. Production Engineer, 51, No. 5, p 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    McAuley J (1972) Machine grouping for efficient production. Production Engineer, 51, p53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Marklew J J (1972) The cell system of manufacture — a detailed case history of an application in a small firm. Machinery and Production Engineering, 54, p 35.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Astrop A W (1973) Production cells drastically reduce lead time. Machinery and Production Engineering, 11, p 470.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Banerjee S K, Southern G & Gallagher C C (1973) Component statistics of a ship’s hull structure. 3rd International Conference on Product Development and Manufacturing Technology, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Gallagher C C, Banerjee S K & Southern G (1974) Group technology in the shipbuilding industry. International Journal of Production Research, 1, p 15.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Banerjee S K (1979) Shipyard production systems design: a statistical approach. International journal of Production Research, 6, p 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Tarsuslugil M & Bloor J (1980) The use of similarity coefficients and cluster analysis in production flow analysis. Proceedings of 20th International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, September 1979, p 525.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Wishart D (1983) CLUSTAN User Manual, (third edition), version 2.1, Program Library Unit, Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Maji R K (1985) PhD Thesis (in preparation), Department of Production Management and Manufacturing Technology, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Banerjee
    • 1
  • R. K. Maji
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Production Management and Manufacturing TechnologyUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations