Practical Feeding—Channel Catfish

  • Tom Lovell

Abstract

Culture of channel catfish (Figure 7.1) is the largest aquacultural industry in the United States. It grew from insignificance in the late 1960s to an annual production of near 150,000 tons in 1986 (USDA 1987). The freshwater catfish carries a stigma in the eyes of many consumers in the United States. However, energetic market development has increased the demand for this fish in many areas. The flesh is mostly white muscle, is free of intramuscular bones, and has a mild flavor.

Keywords

Fish Size Channel Catfish Pellet Diet Feed Consumption Water Quality Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. CACHO, O. J. 1984. Effects of fish size and dietary protein level on growth, feed consumption and feed efficiency by channel catfish. Master’s thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, AL.Google Scholar
  2. DERU, J. 1985. Effects of dietary energy-protein ratio on composition of gain by channel catfish and autoxidation of the fish in frozen storage. Master’s thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, AL.Google Scholar
  3. DURVE, V. S., and R. T. LOVELL. 1982. Vitamin C and disease resistance in channel catfish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39: 948–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. LI, Y., and R. T. LOVELL. 1984. Elevated levels of dietary ascorbic acid increase immune responses in channel catfish. J. Nutr. 115: 123–131.Google Scholar
  5. LOVELL, R. T. 1977. Feeding practice. In Nutrition and feeding of channel catfish, eds. R. R. Stickney, and R. T. Lovell. South. Coop. Ser. Bull. 218.Google Scholar
  6. LOVELL, R. T. 1979. Factors affecting voluntary food consumption by channel catfish. Proceedings of the World Symposium on Finfish Nutrition and Fish Feed Technology, pp. 556–561. Hamburg, 20–23 June, 1978.Google Scholar
  7. PAGE, J. W., and J. W. ANDREWS. 1973. Interactions of dietary levels of protein and energy on channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). J. Nutr. 103: 1339–1346.Google Scholar
  8. PRATHER, E. E., and R. T. LOVELL. 1972. Effect of vitamin fortification in Auburn No. 2 fish feed. Proc. S.E. Assoc. Game and Fish Comm. 25: 479–483.Google Scholar
  9. United States Department of Agriculture. 1987. Catfish market report. SpCr 8. Washington, DC: Agricultural Statistics Board.Google Scholar
  10. WIANG, C. 1977. Nutritional contribution of natural pond organisms to channel catfish growth in intensively-fed ponds. Ph.D. diss., Auburn University, Auburn, AL.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Lovell
    • 1
  1. 1.Auburn UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations